{"title":"由头颈部外科医生进行显微外科游离皮瓣重建:对同一机构125例患者的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Paola Solis-Pazmino , Luiz Osowski , Bruno Zittlau , Juliane Bucco Gomes , Rafaela Andrade , Daniel Solis- Pazmino , Virgilio Gonzales Zanella","doi":"10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction (MFFR) is a keystone in head and neck surgery because it offers better functional outcomes, less donor site morbidity, improved esthetics, and higher success rates.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide a comprehensive overview of our experience with MFFR, exploring its indications, procedural details, outcomes, and emerging trends in postoperative care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 125 patients who underwent MFFR between June 2016 and July 2024 at the Hospital Santa Casa de Misericordia, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, flap type, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, including flap survival and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>125 patients (57.6 % male; mean age: 59 (SD 15.9)) were included. The most common tumor location was the oral cavity. The predominant diagnosis was head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (60.8 %), and the most commonly used free flap was the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap (37.6 %). The overall flap success rate was 93.7 %, while the incidence of flap failure was 6.4 %. The main causes of flap failure were arterial thrombosis (37.5 %) and venous thrombosis (25 %). Notably, 72.2 % of patients did not require ICU admission postoperatively, with no significant difference in outcomes between patients managed in the ICU and those managed in non-ICU settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MFFR is a reliable technique when performed by an experienced head and neck team, achieving high success rates even when performed in non-ICU settings. Carefully selected patients can be safely managed outside the ICU, presenting a cost-effective model of care in resource-limited environments. Further studies are warranted to refine patient selection criteria and postoperative monitoring protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100051,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microsurgical free flap reconstruction performed by head and neck surgeons: a retrospective cohort study of 125 patients of a single institution\",\"authors\":\"Paola Solis-Pazmino , Luiz Osowski , Bruno Zittlau , Juliane Bucco Gomes , Rafaela Andrade , Daniel Solis- Pazmino , Virgilio Gonzales Zanella\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adoms.2025.100564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction (MFFR) is a keystone in head and neck surgery because it offers better functional outcomes, less donor site morbidity, improved esthetics, and higher success rates.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide a comprehensive overview of our experience with MFFR, exploring its indications, procedural details, outcomes, and emerging trends in postoperative care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 125 patients who underwent MFFR between June 2016 and July 2024 at the Hospital Santa Casa de Misericordia, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, flap type, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, including flap survival and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>125 patients (57.6 % male; mean age: 59 (SD 15.9)) were included. The most common tumor location was the oral cavity. The predominant diagnosis was head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (60.8 %), and the most commonly used free flap was the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap (37.6 %). The overall flap success rate was 93.7 %, while the incidence of flap failure was 6.4 %. The main causes of flap failure were arterial thrombosis (37.5 %) and venous thrombosis (25 %). Notably, 72.2 % of patients did not require ICU admission postoperatively, with no significant difference in outcomes between patients managed in the ICU and those managed in non-ICU settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MFFR is a reliable technique when performed by an experienced head and neck team, achieving high success rates even when performed in non-ICU settings. Carefully selected patients can be safely managed outside the ICU, presenting a cost-effective model of care in resource-limited environments. Further studies are warranted to refine patient selection criteria and postoperative monitoring protocols.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147625000500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667147625000500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
显微外科自由皮瓣重建(MFFR)是头颈部手术的基石,因为它提供了更好的功能结果,更少的供区发病率,改善美学和更高的成功率。目的全面总结MFFR的经验,探讨其适应症、手术细节、结果和术后护理的新趋势。方法对2016年6月至2024年7月在巴西阿雷格里港Santa Casa de Misericordia医院接受MFFR治疗的125例患者进行回顾性队列研究。分析患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征、皮瓣类型、手术细节和术后结果,包括皮瓣存活和入住重症监护病房(ICU)的需要。结果125例患者(男性57.6%;平均年龄:59岁(SD 15.9))。最常见的肿瘤部位是口腔。主要诊断为头颈部鳞状细胞癌(60.8%),最常用的游离皮瓣为股前外侧(ALT)皮瓣(37.6%)。皮瓣总成功率为93.7%,皮瓣失败率为6.4%。皮瓣失败的主要原因是动脉血栓形成(37.5%)和静脉血栓形成(25%)。值得注意的是,72.2%的患者术后不需要进入ICU,在ICU治疗的患者和在非ICU治疗的患者之间的结果没有显著差异。结论mffr是一种可靠的技术,由经验丰富的头颈部团队实施,即使在非icu环境下也有很高的成功率。精心挑选的患者可以安全地在ICU外进行管理,在资源有限的环境中提供具有成本效益的护理模式。需要进一步的研究来完善患者选择标准和术后监测方案。
Microsurgical free flap reconstruction performed by head and neck surgeons: a retrospective cohort study of 125 patients of a single institution
Background
Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction (MFFR) is a keystone in head and neck surgery because it offers better functional outcomes, less donor site morbidity, improved esthetics, and higher success rates.
Objective
To provide a comprehensive overview of our experience with MFFR, exploring its indications, procedural details, outcomes, and emerging trends in postoperative care.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 125 patients who underwent MFFR between June 2016 and July 2024 at the Hospital Santa Casa de Misericordia, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, flap type, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, including flap survival and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission.
Results
125 patients (57.6 % male; mean age: 59 (SD 15.9)) were included. The most common tumor location was the oral cavity. The predominant diagnosis was head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (60.8 %), and the most commonly used free flap was the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap (37.6 %). The overall flap success rate was 93.7 %, while the incidence of flap failure was 6.4 %. The main causes of flap failure were arterial thrombosis (37.5 %) and venous thrombosis (25 %). Notably, 72.2 % of patients did not require ICU admission postoperatively, with no significant difference in outcomes between patients managed in the ICU and those managed in non-ICU settings.
Conclusion
MFFR is a reliable technique when performed by an experienced head and neck team, achieving high success rates even when performed in non-ICU settings. Carefully selected patients can be safely managed outside the ICU, presenting a cost-effective model of care in resource-limited environments. Further studies are warranted to refine patient selection criteria and postoperative monitoring protocols.