{"title":"CAI−Community Aggregated Index:结合多样性指数对物种组合进行排序和比较的工具","authors":"Federico Morelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conservation science needs suitable methods for integrating different biodiversity facets to deliver cost-effective conservation strategies for threatened species and communities. In recent years, spatial comparisons based on species assemblages (e.g., communities) were performed using species richness, functional diversity, evolutionary diversity, and many other community or diversity metrics. Here, I propose using a bi-dimensional community index (e.g., Community Aggregated Index – CAI), capable of performing a multifaceted site-level prioritization, as a tool for conservation planning. CAI combines the overall sum of standardized values (named Multi Diverse Value) of taxonomic, functional, and evolutionary diversity in the first axis and the degree of uniformity (named Diversity Evenness) of the three standardized diversity values in the second axis. With these two axes, the communities characterized can be classified into a bi-dimensional space with four quadrants. In this case study, CAI was applied to identify the high-priority, penalized, and low-priority bird communities in three different habitats of Central Italy. Other diversity metrics can be used in the calculation of CAI, replacing the metrics used in this study. This bi-dimensional community index offers a versatile tool for creating comparisons among communities, with potential use to support the decision-making process in conservation planning. This information can be used to prioritize areas and allocate resources to the conservation of communities/ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 127017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAI − Community Aggregated Index: a tool to rank and compare species assemblages combining diversity indices\",\"authors\":\"Federico Morelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Conservation science needs suitable methods for integrating different biodiversity facets to deliver cost-effective conservation strategies for threatened species and communities. In recent years, spatial comparisons based on species assemblages (e.g., communities) were performed using species richness, functional diversity, evolutionary diversity, and many other community or diversity metrics. Here, I propose using a bi-dimensional community index (e.g., Community Aggregated Index – CAI), capable of performing a multifaceted site-level prioritization, as a tool for conservation planning. CAI combines the overall sum of standardized values (named Multi Diverse Value) of taxonomic, functional, and evolutionary diversity in the first axis and the degree of uniformity (named Diversity Evenness) of the three standardized diversity values in the second axis. With these two axes, the communities characterized can be classified into a bi-dimensional space with four quadrants. In this case study, CAI was applied to identify the high-priority, penalized, and low-priority bird communities in three different habitats of Central Italy. Other diversity metrics can be used in the calculation of CAI, replacing the metrics used in this study. This bi-dimensional community index offers a versatile tool for creating comparisons among communities, with potential use to support the decision-making process in conservation planning. This information can be used to prioritize areas and allocate resources to the conservation of communities/ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Nature Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125001943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125001943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
CAI − Community Aggregated Index: a tool to rank and compare species assemblages combining diversity indices
Conservation science needs suitable methods for integrating different biodiversity facets to deliver cost-effective conservation strategies for threatened species and communities. In recent years, spatial comparisons based on species assemblages (e.g., communities) were performed using species richness, functional diversity, evolutionary diversity, and many other community or diversity metrics. Here, I propose using a bi-dimensional community index (e.g., Community Aggregated Index – CAI), capable of performing a multifaceted site-level prioritization, as a tool for conservation planning. CAI combines the overall sum of standardized values (named Multi Diverse Value) of taxonomic, functional, and evolutionary diversity in the first axis and the degree of uniformity (named Diversity Evenness) of the three standardized diversity values in the second axis. With these two axes, the communities characterized can be classified into a bi-dimensional space with four quadrants. In this case study, CAI was applied to identify the high-priority, penalized, and low-priority bird communities in three different habitats of Central Italy. Other diversity metrics can be used in the calculation of CAI, replacing the metrics used in this study. This bi-dimensional community index offers a versatile tool for creating comparisons among communities, with potential use to support the decision-making process in conservation planning. This information can be used to prioritize areas and allocate resources to the conservation of communities/ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.