从地缘政治风险的角度看中国的金融稳定:政策不确定性对气候变化的影响

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mohammad Haseeb , Muhammad Usman , Fei Fan
{"title":"从地缘政治风险的角度看中国的金融稳定:政策不确定性对气候变化的影响","authors":"Mohammad Haseeb ,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Fei Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global political and economic landscape is rapidly evolving, with increasing geopolitical risks and climate-related fluctuations. This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk, economic and trade policy uncertainty, and disaggregated financial development on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China from 1997–M1 to 2024–M12, using quantile-on-quantile regression and cross-quantilogram methods. The empirical findings reveal that geopolitical risk has a mixed impact on emissions, depending on economic conditions. Also, economic policy uncertainty consistently raises emissions, similarly trade policy uncertainty is positively associated with emissions, especially at higher quantiles. Moreover, financial development generally increases emissions, with financial institutions amplifying this effect. However, financial market development reduces emissions at lower quantiles but increases them at higher ones, signifying a dual influences. To effectively tackle climate change, China should embrace a holistic policy approach that weaves together economic, financial, and geopolitical strategies. This includes adopting carbon pricing and green subsidies, steering investments through strong ESG standards, expanding access to climate finance, and deepening international cooperation to drive a just and inclusive low-carbon transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 107944"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding financial stability through the lens of geopolitical risk in China: The influence of policy uncertainty on climate change\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Haseeb ,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Fei Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global political and economic landscape is rapidly evolving, with increasing geopolitical risks and climate-related fluctuations. This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk, economic and trade policy uncertainty, and disaggregated financial development on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China from 1997–M1 to 2024–M12, using quantile-on-quantile regression and cross-quantilogram methods. The empirical findings reveal that geopolitical risk has a mixed impact on emissions, depending on economic conditions. Also, economic policy uncertainty consistently raises emissions, similarly trade policy uncertainty is positively associated with emissions, especially at higher quantiles. Moreover, financial development generally increases emissions, with financial institutions amplifying this effect. However, financial market development reduces emissions at lower quantiles but increases them at higher ones, signifying a dual influences. To effectively tackle climate change, China should embrace a holistic policy approach that weaves together economic, financial, and geopolitical strategies. This includes adopting carbon pricing and green subsidies, steering investments through strong ESG standards, expanding access to climate finance, and deepening international cooperation to drive a just and inclusive low-carbon transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325012024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325012024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球政治和经济格局正在迅速演变,地缘政治风险和与气候有关的波动不断增加。本文采用分位数对分位数回归和交叉量化分析方法,分析了1997 - 12年1月至2024 - 12年1月期间地缘政治风险、经贸政策不确定性和金融发展分类对中国温室气体排放的影响。实证结果表明,地缘政治风险对排放的影响是混合的,这取决于经济条件。此外,经济政策的不确定性持续增加排放,同样,贸易政策的不确定性与排放呈正相关,特别是在较高的分位数。此外,金融发展通常会增加排放,而金融机构会放大这一效应。然而,金融市场的发展减少了低分位数的排放,但增加了高分位数的排放,这表明了双重影响。为了有效应对气候变化,中国应该采取综合政策,将经济、金融和地缘政治战略结合起来。这包括采用碳定价和绿色补贴,通过强有力的ESG标准引导投资,扩大气候融资渠道,深化国际合作以推动公正和包容性的低碳转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding financial stability through the lens of geopolitical risk in China: The influence of policy uncertainty on climate change
The global political and economic landscape is rapidly evolving, with increasing geopolitical risks and climate-related fluctuations. This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk, economic and trade policy uncertainty, and disaggregated financial development on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China from 1997–M1 to 2024–M12, using quantile-on-quantile regression and cross-quantilogram methods. The empirical findings reveal that geopolitical risk has a mixed impact on emissions, depending on economic conditions. Also, economic policy uncertainty consistently raises emissions, similarly trade policy uncertainty is positively associated with emissions, especially at higher quantiles. Moreover, financial development generally increases emissions, with financial institutions amplifying this effect. However, financial market development reduces emissions at lower quantiles but increases them at higher ones, signifying a dual influences. To effectively tackle climate change, China should embrace a holistic policy approach that weaves together economic, financial, and geopolitical strategies. This includes adopting carbon pricing and green subsidies, steering investments through strong ESG standards, expanding access to climate finance, and deepening international cooperation to drive a just and inclusive low-carbon transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信