{"title":"从地缘政治风险的角度看中国的金融稳定:政策不确定性对气候变化的影响","authors":"Mohammad Haseeb , Muhammad Usman , Fei Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global political and economic landscape is rapidly evolving, with increasing geopolitical risks and climate-related fluctuations. This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk, economic and trade policy uncertainty, and disaggregated financial development on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China from 1997–M1 to 2024–M12, using quantile-on-quantile regression and cross-quantilogram methods. The empirical findings reveal that geopolitical risk has a mixed impact on emissions, depending on economic conditions. Also, economic policy uncertainty consistently raises emissions, similarly trade policy uncertainty is positively associated with emissions, especially at higher quantiles. Moreover, financial development generally increases emissions, with financial institutions amplifying this effect. However, financial market development reduces emissions at lower quantiles but increases them at higher ones, signifying a dual influences. To effectively tackle climate change, China should embrace a holistic policy approach that weaves together economic, financial, and geopolitical strategies. This includes adopting carbon pricing and green subsidies, steering investments through strong ESG standards, expanding access to climate finance, and deepening international cooperation to drive a just and inclusive low-carbon transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 107944"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding financial stability through the lens of geopolitical risk in China: The influence of policy uncertainty on climate change\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Haseeb , Muhammad Usman , Fei Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global political and economic landscape is rapidly evolving, with increasing geopolitical risks and climate-related fluctuations. This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk, economic and trade policy uncertainty, and disaggregated financial development on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China from 1997–M1 to 2024–M12, using quantile-on-quantile regression and cross-quantilogram methods. The empirical findings reveal that geopolitical risk has a mixed impact on emissions, depending on economic conditions. Also, economic policy uncertainty consistently raises emissions, similarly trade policy uncertainty is positively associated with emissions, especially at higher quantiles. Moreover, financial development generally increases emissions, with financial institutions amplifying this effect. However, financial market development reduces emissions at lower quantiles but increases them at higher ones, signifying a dual influences. To effectively tackle climate change, China should embrace a holistic policy approach that weaves together economic, financial, and geopolitical strategies. This includes adopting carbon pricing and green subsidies, steering investments through strong ESG standards, expanding access to climate finance, and deepening international cooperation to drive a just and inclusive low-carbon transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325012024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325012024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding financial stability through the lens of geopolitical risk in China: The influence of policy uncertainty on climate change
The global political and economic landscape is rapidly evolving, with increasing geopolitical risks and climate-related fluctuations. This study analyzes the impact of geopolitical risk, economic and trade policy uncertainty, and disaggregated financial development on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China from 1997–M1 to 2024–M12, using quantile-on-quantile regression and cross-quantilogram methods. The empirical findings reveal that geopolitical risk has a mixed impact on emissions, depending on economic conditions. Also, economic policy uncertainty consistently raises emissions, similarly trade policy uncertainty is positively associated with emissions, especially at higher quantiles. Moreover, financial development generally increases emissions, with financial institutions amplifying this effect. However, financial market development reduces emissions at lower quantiles but increases them at higher ones, signifying a dual influences. To effectively tackle climate change, China should embrace a holistic policy approach that weaves together economic, financial, and geopolitical strategies. This includes adopting carbon pricing and green subsidies, steering investments through strong ESG standards, expanding access to climate finance, and deepening international cooperation to drive a just and inclusive low-carbon transition.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance