Chongsheng Lu , Wengeng Cao , Xiangzhi Li , Yu Ren , Yanyan Wang
{"title":"黄河下游鲁北平原典型河流平原和沿岸平原浅层地下水砷碘共富集机制","authors":"Chongsheng Lu , Wengeng Cao , Xiangzhi Li , Yu Ren , Yanyan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High arsenic (As) and iodine (I) groundwater in shallow aquifers have been extensively investigated, but the co-enrichment under different environments is not well-understood. To address these issues, we explored the hydrochemistry of groundwater in typical fluvial plain (FP) and littoral plain (LP) of the Lubei Plain, and elucidated the source apportionment, further revealed its control mechanism on As and I enrichment. Results showed that the groundwaters in FP were mainly HCO<sub>3</sub>–Mg·Ca and in LP were mainly Cl–Na. Silicate weathering (35.6 %), evaporite dissolution (26.9 %), and reductive dissolution (20.1 %) dominated hydrochemistry in FP, but in LP were evaporation-seawater intrusion (32.8 %) and silicate weathering (29.3 %), followed by reductive dissolution of Mn (22.5 %) and the Fe minerals (15.4 %). Furthermore, the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and silicate weathering were the dominat processes for As and I co-enrichment. Specifically, groundwater As release were controlled by the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and the competitive adsorption of HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> in LP, while promoted by the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and silicate weathering in FP. Groundwater I enrichment were driven by silicate weathering and seawater intrusion in LP, but facilitated by reductive dissolution of Fe–Mn minerals and silicate weathering in FP. Risk assessment results showed a higher risk of groundwater As than I, especially for children both in LP (23.3 %) and FP (35.5 %). This work has enriched the co-enrichment mechanism of As and I, providing a basis for the safe utilization of groundwater in the Lubei Plain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 106504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of arsenic and iodine co-enrichment in shallow groundwater from typical fluvial plain and littoral plain of the Lubei plain in the lower Yellow River, China\",\"authors\":\"Chongsheng Lu , Wengeng Cao , Xiangzhi Li , Yu Ren , Yanyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2025.106504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>High arsenic (As) and iodine (I) groundwater in shallow aquifers have been extensively investigated, but the co-enrichment under different environments is not well-understood. To address these issues, we explored the hydrochemistry of groundwater in typical fluvial plain (FP) and littoral plain (LP) of the Lubei Plain, and elucidated the source apportionment, further revealed its control mechanism on As and I enrichment. Results showed that the groundwaters in FP were mainly HCO<sub>3</sub>–Mg·Ca and in LP were mainly Cl–Na. Silicate weathering (35.6 %), evaporite dissolution (26.9 %), and reductive dissolution (20.1 %) dominated hydrochemistry in FP, but in LP were evaporation-seawater intrusion (32.8 %) and silicate weathering (29.3 %), followed by reductive dissolution of Mn (22.5 %) and the Fe minerals (15.4 %). Furthermore, the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and silicate weathering were the dominat processes for As and I co-enrichment. Specifically, groundwater As release were controlled by the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and the competitive adsorption of HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> in LP, while promoted by the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and silicate weathering in FP. Groundwater I enrichment were driven by silicate weathering and seawater intrusion in LP, but facilitated by reductive dissolution of Fe–Mn minerals and silicate weathering in FP. Risk assessment results showed a higher risk of groundwater As than I, especially for children both in LP (23.3 %) and FP (35.5 %). This work has enriched the co-enrichment mechanism of As and I, providing a basis for the safe utilization of groundwater in the Lubei Plain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Geochemistry\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Geochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292725002276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292725002276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mechanisms of arsenic and iodine co-enrichment in shallow groundwater from typical fluvial plain and littoral plain of the Lubei plain in the lower Yellow River, China
High arsenic (As) and iodine (I) groundwater in shallow aquifers have been extensively investigated, but the co-enrichment under different environments is not well-understood. To address these issues, we explored the hydrochemistry of groundwater in typical fluvial plain (FP) and littoral plain (LP) of the Lubei Plain, and elucidated the source apportionment, further revealed its control mechanism on As and I enrichment. Results showed that the groundwaters in FP were mainly HCO3–Mg·Ca and in LP were mainly Cl–Na. Silicate weathering (35.6 %), evaporite dissolution (26.9 %), and reductive dissolution (20.1 %) dominated hydrochemistry in FP, but in LP were evaporation-seawater intrusion (32.8 %) and silicate weathering (29.3 %), followed by reductive dissolution of Mn (22.5 %) and the Fe minerals (15.4 %). Furthermore, the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and silicate weathering were the dominat processes for As and I co-enrichment. Specifically, groundwater As release were controlled by the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and the competitive adsorption of HCO3− in LP, while promoted by the reductive dissolution of Fe(III) and silicate weathering in FP. Groundwater I enrichment were driven by silicate weathering and seawater intrusion in LP, but facilitated by reductive dissolution of Fe–Mn minerals and silicate weathering in FP. Risk assessment results showed a higher risk of groundwater As than I, especially for children both in LP (23.3 %) and FP (35.5 %). This work has enriched the co-enrichment mechanism of As and I, providing a basis for the safe utilization of groundwater in the Lubei Plain.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.