{"title":"私人股本在德国门诊部门的作用","authors":"Beate Jochimsen , Bernhard Gibis","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of private equity in the German outpatient sector\",\"authors\":\"Beate Jochimsen , Bernhard Gibis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of private equity in the German outpatient sector
Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.