私人股本在德国门诊部门的作用

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Beate Jochimsen , Bernhard Gibis
{"title":"私人股本在德国门诊部门的作用","authors":"Beate Jochimsen ,&nbsp;Bernhard Gibis","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of private equity in the German outpatient sector\",\"authors\":\"Beate Jochimsen ,&nbsp;Bernhard Gibis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国的门诊医疗传统上是由个体医生提供的,主要是单独或小团体执业。2004年的一项改革首次允许企业私人投资者为门诊医疗提供资金。从那时起,建立所谓的医疗保健中心(mcc)已成为公共保健的主要内容。从一开始,人们就担心经济利益可能与公共卫生系统的价值观相冲突。然而,明显缺乏经验证据来支持这种潜在的冲突。本研究试图通过三种方法来缩小经验差距:范围审查、确定相关数据来源和简短的案例研究。我们的研究结果表明,迄今为止,没有经验证据表明,当私人股本投资者为mcc提供资金时,医疗服务的质量或范围会下降。尽管如此,寡头垄断结构的潜在出现以及供应商所有权和结构缺乏透明度要求进行仔细的监管。政策建议包括加强与医疗结果、成本和提供者特征(例如所有权或隶属关系)有关的数据基础设施,并保护医疗决策不受所有者利益驱动的影响。随着包括私募股权在内的私人投资在门诊护理领域的增长,在几乎所有医疗保健系统中都可以观察到,一种国际比较方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of private equity in the German outpatient sector
Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信