在性取向和性别认同数据的标准化收集中实施利益相关者知情的方法:在矩阵综合癌症中心的经验教训。

Susan L Parker, Montserrat Ayala-Ramirez, Jane R Montealegre, Michael E Scheurer
{"title":"在性取向和性别认同数据的标准化收集中实施利益相关者知情的方法:在矩阵综合癌症中心的经验教训。","authors":"Susan L Parker, Montserrat Ayala-Ramirez, Jane R Montealegre, Michael E Scheurer","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaf013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This brief report describes takeaways from the implementation of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within a matrix comprehensive cancer center. Implementation of standardized and parsimonious SOGI data collection practices is a strategy recommended to improve our understanding of the cancer experiences among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. However, interventions are rarely sustained in routine practice without an organized program to support their implementation. We used a stakeholder-engaged approach to integrate a SOGI questionnaire in the electronic health record (EHR) at Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center (DLDCCC)-affiliated adult oncology clinics and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and utilization among providers and staff. In Phase 1, we convened a Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) for this project comprising leadership, providers, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Through focus groups held over a 12-month period, the SAB defined barriers and facilitators to SOGI data collection and determined strategies to support the sustained implementation of SOGI data collection in oncology clinics. In Phase 2, we assessed the acceptability and feasibility of SOGI data collection among providers and staff. Semistructured interviews showed that key stakeholders perceived SOGI data collection as highly acceptable and feasible. These stakeholders perceived that SOGI data collection may improve clinical decision-making and help provide better patient-centered care to sexual and gender minorities. Barriers at multiple ecological levels hinder routine SOGI data collection. Bundling SOGI data collection implementation with other institutional initiatives was a successful strategy for our partner institution. Implementation strategies focused on provider and staff education. SOGI data collection is highly acceptable among stakeholders in DLDCCC-affiliated adult oncology clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":"2025 69","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12268163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a stakeholder-informed approach for standardized collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data: lessons learned at a matrix comprehensive cancer center.\",\"authors\":\"Susan L Parker, Montserrat Ayala-Ramirez, Jane R Montealegre, Michael E Scheurer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaf013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This brief report describes takeaways from the implementation of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within a matrix comprehensive cancer center. Implementation of standardized and parsimonious SOGI data collection practices is a strategy recommended to improve our understanding of the cancer experiences among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. However, interventions are rarely sustained in routine practice without an organized program to support their implementation. We used a stakeholder-engaged approach to integrate a SOGI questionnaire in the electronic health record (EHR) at Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center (DLDCCC)-affiliated adult oncology clinics and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and utilization among providers and staff. In Phase 1, we convened a Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) for this project comprising leadership, providers, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Through focus groups held over a 12-month period, the SAB defined barriers and facilitators to SOGI data collection and determined strategies to support the sustained implementation of SOGI data collection in oncology clinics. In Phase 2, we assessed the acceptability and feasibility of SOGI data collection among providers and staff. Semistructured interviews showed that key stakeholders perceived SOGI data collection as highly acceptable and feasible. These stakeholders perceived that SOGI data collection may improve clinical decision-making and help provide better patient-centered care to sexual and gender minorities. Barriers at multiple ecological levels hinder routine SOGI data collection. Bundling SOGI data collection implementation with other institutional initiatives was a successful strategy for our partner institution. Implementation strategies focused on provider and staff education. SOGI data collection is highly acceptable among stakeholders in DLDCCC-affiliated adult oncology clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs\",\"volume\":\"2025 69\",\"pages\":\"134-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12268163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaf013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaf013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇简短的报告描述了在矩阵综合癌症中心实施性取向和性别认同(SOGI)数据收集的要点。实施标准化和精简的SOGI数据收集实践是一种建议的策略,以提高我们对性少数和性别少数(SGM)人群癌症经历的理解。然而,如果没有一个有组织的计划来支持其实施,干预措施很少能在日常实践中持续下去。我们采用利益相关者参与的方法,将SOGI问卷整合到Dan L Duncan综合癌症中心(DLDCCC)附属成人肿瘤诊所的电子健康记录(EHR)中,并评估其可行性、可接受性以及提供者和工作人员的使用情况。在第一阶段,我们为这个项目召集了一个利益相关者咨询委员会(SAB),包括领导层、供应商和LGBTQ+社区的成员。通过为期12个月的焦点小组讨论,SAB确定了SOGI数据收集的障碍和促进因素,并确定了支持SOGI数据收集在肿瘤诊所持续实施的策略。在第二阶段,我们评估了供应商和员工收集SOGI数据的可接受性和可行性。半结构化访谈显示,关键利益相关者认为SOGI数据收集是高度可接受和可行的。这些利益相关者认为,收集SOGI数据可以改善临床决策,并有助于为性和性别少数群体提供更好的以患者为中心的护理。多个生态层面的障碍阻碍了SOGI的常规数据收集。将SOGI数据收集实施与其他机构举措捆绑在一起,对我们的合作机构来说是一项成功的战略。实施战略侧重于提供者和工作人员的教育。SOGI数据收集在dldccc附属成人肿瘤诊所的利益相关者中是高度可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing a stakeholder-informed approach for standardized collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data: lessons learned at a matrix comprehensive cancer center.

This brief report describes takeaways from the implementation of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection within a matrix comprehensive cancer center. Implementation of standardized and parsimonious SOGI data collection practices is a strategy recommended to improve our understanding of the cancer experiences among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. However, interventions are rarely sustained in routine practice without an organized program to support their implementation. We used a stakeholder-engaged approach to integrate a SOGI questionnaire in the electronic health record (EHR) at Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center (DLDCCC)-affiliated adult oncology clinics and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and utilization among providers and staff. In Phase 1, we convened a Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) for this project comprising leadership, providers, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Through focus groups held over a 12-month period, the SAB defined barriers and facilitators to SOGI data collection and determined strategies to support the sustained implementation of SOGI data collection in oncology clinics. In Phase 2, we assessed the acceptability and feasibility of SOGI data collection among providers and staff. Semistructured interviews showed that key stakeholders perceived SOGI data collection as highly acceptable and feasible. These stakeholders perceived that SOGI data collection may improve clinical decision-making and help provide better patient-centered care to sexual and gender minorities. Barriers at multiple ecological levels hinder routine SOGI data collection. Bundling SOGI data collection implementation with other institutional initiatives was a successful strategy for our partner institution. Implementation strategies focused on provider and staff education. SOGI data collection is highly acceptable among stakeholders in DLDCCC-affiliated adult oncology clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信