围产期姑息治疗研究的重点:一项国际德尔菲研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Martin Loučka, Markéta Zindulková, Hana M Dvořáková, Zuzana Staníčková
{"title":"围产期姑息治疗研究的重点:一项国际德尔菲研究。","authors":"Martin Loučka, Markéta Zindulková, Hana M Dvořáková, Zuzana Staníčková","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01845-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal palliative care (PPC) addresses the complex needs of families facing life-limiting fetal or neonatal conditions through an interdisciplinary, family-centered approach. Despite growing recognition of its importance, there is a lack of systematically defined research priorities to guide the development of evidence-based PPC practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and establish research priorities for perinatal palliative care (PPC) using a Delphi method with international experts and parents who experienced perinatal loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Delphi study involved three Delphi survey rounds with experts and bereaved parents. Participants provided and refined research priorities across rounds. In the first round, participants provided suggestions for research topics spontaneously. Topics were analyzed using principles of thematic analysis and further rated and ranked based on their importance in two additional rounds of consensual scoring. Consensus was defined as a score above the mean from at least 75% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 experts and 10 parents who experienced a perinatal loss were invited to participate in the study. Response rate in the three rounds was 24, 31, and 34%. A total of 187 research priorities were initially suggested, resulting in 34 topics reaching consensus. Final rankings and priority topics were categorized into seven thematic areas: organization of care, decision-making and communication, staff support and education, ethics, symptom management, bereavement, and family experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified critical research areas in PPC, providing a roadmap for future research to enhance support for families and healthcare providers in PPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priorities for research in perinatal palliative care: an international Delphi study.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Loučka, Markéta Zindulková, Hana M Dvořáková, Zuzana Staníčková\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-025-01845-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perinatal palliative care (PPC) addresses the complex needs of families facing life-limiting fetal or neonatal conditions through an interdisciplinary, family-centered approach. Despite growing recognition of its importance, there is a lack of systematically defined research priorities to guide the development of evidence-based PPC practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and establish research priorities for perinatal palliative care (PPC) using a Delphi method with international experts and parents who experienced perinatal loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Delphi study involved three Delphi survey rounds with experts and bereaved parents. Participants provided and refined research priorities across rounds. In the first round, participants provided suggestions for research topics spontaneously. Topics were analyzed using principles of thematic analysis and further rated and ranked based on their importance in two additional rounds of consensual scoring. Consensus was defined as a score above the mean from at least 75% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 experts and 10 parents who experienced a perinatal loss were invited to participate in the study. Response rate in the three rounds was 24, 31, and 34%. A total of 187 research priorities were initially suggested, resulting in 34 topics reaching consensus. Final rankings and priority topics were categorized into seven thematic areas: organization of care, decision-making and communication, staff support and education, ethics, symptom management, bereavement, and family experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified critical research areas in PPC, providing a roadmap for future research to enhance support for families and healthcare providers in PPC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265320/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01845-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01845-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围产期姑息治疗(PPC)通过跨学科、以家庭为中心的方法,解决了面临生命受限胎儿或新生儿疾病的家庭的复杂需求。尽管人们越来越认识到其重要性,但缺乏系统地确定研究重点,以指导以证据为基础的PPC实践的发展。目的:采用德尔菲法,与国际专家和经历过围产期损失的家长一起确定围产期姑息治疗(PPC)的研究重点。方法采用三轮德尔菲调查,由专家和丧亲父母参与。与会者提供并细化了各轮的研究重点。第一轮,参与者自发提出研究课题建议。使用主题分析原则对主题进行分析,并根据其在另外两轮共识评分中的重要性进行进一步评级和排名。共识被定义为至少75%的受访者得分高于平均值。结果:共邀请125名专家和10名经历过围产期损失的家长参与研究。三轮的应答率分别为24%、31%和34%。初步提出了187个研究重点,最终达成共识的课题有34个。最终排名和优先主题分为七个主题领域:护理组织、决策和沟通、工作人员支持和教育、道德、症状管理、丧亲之痛和家庭经验。结论:本研究确定了PPC的关键研究领域,为未来的研究提供了路线图,以加强对PPC家庭和医疗保健提供者的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Priorities for research in perinatal palliative care: an international Delphi study.

Priorities for research in perinatal palliative care: an international Delphi study.

Background: Perinatal palliative care (PPC) addresses the complex needs of families facing life-limiting fetal or neonatal conditions through an interdisciplinary, family-centered approach. Despite growing recognition of its importance, there is a lack of systematically defined research priorities to guide the development of evidence-based PPC practices.

Objective: To identify and establish research priorities for perinatal palliative care (PPC) using a Delphi method with international experts and parents who experienced perinatal loss.

Methods: This Delphi study involved three Delphi survey rounds with experts and bereaved parents. Participants provided and refined research priorities across rounds. In the first round, participants provided suggestions for research topics spontaneously. Topics were analyzed using principles of thematic analysis and further rated and ranked based on their importance in two additional rounds of consensual scoring. Consensus was defined as a score above the mean from at least 75% of respondents.

Results: A total of 125 experts and 10 parents who experienced a perinatal loss were invited to participate in the study. Response rate in the three rounds was 24, 31, and 34%. A total of 187 research priorities were initially suggested, resulting in 34 topics reaching consensus. Final rankings and priority topics were categorized into seven thematic areas: organization of care, decision-making and communication, staff support and education, ethics, symptom management, bereavement, and family experience.

Conclusions: This study identified critical research areas in PPC, providing a roadmap for future research to enhance support for families and healthcare providers in PPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信