奥地利助产士的第二个受害者现象(SeViD-A3):一项横断面研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-07-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/206922
Victoria Klemm, Eva Potura, Sabine Fuerst, Hannah Roesner, Reinhard Strametz
{"title":"奥地利助产士的第二个受害者现象(SeViD-A3):一项横断面研究。","authors":"Victoria Klemm, Eva Potura, Sabine Fuerst, Hannah Roesner, Reinhard Strametz","doi":"10.18332/ejm/206922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midwives frequently encounter adverse events, potentially leading to the Second Victim Phenomenon (SVP), a condition marked by emotional distress, self-doubt, and psychological symptoms. This study investigates the prevalence, key triggers, symptom severity, and support needs of midwives in Austria affected by SVP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Austrian midwives (n=487) using the SeViD-questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were applied to assess SVP prevalence, symptoms, and support measures. Binary logistic regression analyses examined predictors of SVP occurrence and symptom severity, while the Mann-Whitney U test compared support preferences between affected and non-affected midwives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SVP prevalence was 94.3%, with self-doubt (52.5%), guilt (47.0%), and flashbacks (41.8%) as the most pronounced symptoms. Work experience and workload did not predict SVP occurrence. However, events involving patient harm (OR=1.92; 95% CI: 1.11-3.31, p=0.02) and higher neuroticism scores (OR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.24-2.11, p<0.01) significantly predicted high symptom severity. Affected midwives rated professional counseling as less helpful than non-affected peers (p=0.03, r=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high prevalence of SVP underscores the need for comprehensive, accessible support for Austrian midwives. Peer support programs should be central, alongside preventive and reactive measures. Support must be inclusive of self-employed midwives. Targeted interventions can enhance mental well-being, improve patient safety, and strengthen healthcare quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The second victim phenomenon among midwives in Austria (SeViD-A3): A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Klemm, Eva Potura, Sabine Fuerst, Hannah Roesner, Reinhard Strametz\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/ejm/206922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midwives frequently encounter adverse events, potentially leading to the Second Victim Phenomenon (SVP), a condition marked by emotional distress, self-doubt, and psychological symptoms. This study investigates the prevalence, key triggers, symptom severity, and support needs of midwives in Austria affected by SVP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Austrian midwives (n=487) using the SeViD-questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were applied to assess SVP prevalence, symptoms, and support measures. Binary logistic regression analyses examined predictors of SVP occurrence and symptom severity, while the Mann-Whitney U test compared support preferences between affected and non-affected midwives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SVP prevalence was 94.3%, with self-doubt (52.5%), guilt (47.0%), and flashbacks (41.8%) as the most pronounced symptoms. Work experience and workload did not predict SVP occurrence. However, events involving patient harm (OR=1.92; 95% CI: 1.11-3.31, p=0.02) and higher neuroticism scores (OR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.24-2.11, p<0.01) significantly predicted high symptom severity. Affected midwives rated professional counseling as less helpful than non-affected peers (p=0.03, r=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high prevalence of SVP underscores the need for comprehensive, accessible support for Austrian midwives. Peer support programs should be central, alongside preventive and reactive measures. Support must be inclusive of self-employed midwives. Targeted interventions can enhance mental well-being, improve patient safety, and strengthen healthcare quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/206922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/206922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

助产士经常遇到不良事件,可能导致第二受害者现象(SVP),这是一种以情绪困扰、自我怀疑和心理症状为特征的状况。本研究调查了奥地利受SVP影响的助产士的患病率、主要触发因素、症状严重程度和支持需求。方法:采用sevid问卷对奥地利助产士(n=487)进行横断面调查。描述性统计应用于评估SVP患病率、症状和支持措施。二元逻辑回归分析检验了SVP发生和症状严重程度的预测因素,而Mann-Whitney U检验比较了受影响和未受影响助产士的支持偏好。结果:SVP患病率为94.3%,以自我怀疑(52.5%)、内疚(47.0%)和闪回(41.8%)为最显著的症状。工作经验和工作量不能预测SVP的发生。然而,涉及患者伤害的事件(OR=1.92;95% CI: 1.11-3.31, p=0.02)和较高的神经质评分(OR=1.62;结论:SVP的高患病率强调了奥地利助产士需要全面、可获得的支持。同伴支持计划应该是核心,同时还有预防和反应措施。支持必须包括自营助产士。有针对性的干预措施可以增强心理健康,改善患者安全,并加强医疗保健质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The second victim phenomenon among midwives in Austria (SeViD-A3): A cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Midwives frequently encounter adverse events, potentially leading to the Second Victim Phenomenon (SVP), a condition marked by emotional distress, self-doubt, and psychological symptoms. This study investigates the prevalence, key triggers, symptom severity, and support needs of midwives in Austria affected by SVP.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Austrian midwives (n=487) using the SeViD-questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were applied to assess SVP prevalence, symptoms, and support measures. Binary logistic regression analyses examined predictors of SVP occurrence and symptom severity, while the Mann-Whitney U test compared support preferences between affected and non-affected midwives.

Results: SVP prevalence was 94.3%, with self-doubt (52.5%), guilt (47.0%), and flashbacks (41.8%) as the most pronounced symptoms. Work experience and workload did not predict SVP occurrence. However, events involving patient harm (OR=1.92; 95% CI: 1.11-3.31, p=0.02) and higher neuroticism scores (OR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.24-2.11, p<0.01) significantly predicted high symptom severity. Affected midwives rated professional counseling as less helpful than non-affected peers (p=0.03, r=0.02).

Conclusions: The high prevalence of SVP underscores the need for comprehensive, accessible support for Austrian midwives. Peer support programs should be central, alongside preventive and reactive measures. Support must be inclusive of self-employed midwives. Targeted interventions can enhance mental well-being, improve patient safety, and strengthen healthcare quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信