Elena Sagues, Navami Shenoy, Alex Van Dam, Lidia Diaz, Andres Gudino, Carlos Dier, Domenica Cifuentes, Ruben Calle, Linder Wendt, Kathleen Dlouhy, Mario Zanaty, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Natalia Garcia-Casares, Edgar A Samaniego
{"title":"动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的体积与认知结局。","authors":"Elena Sagues, Navami Shenoy, Alex Van Dam, Lidia Diaz, Andres Gudino, Carlos Dier, Domenica Cifuentes, Ruben Calle, Linder Wendt, Kathleen Dlouhy, Mario Zanaty, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Natalia Garcia-Casares, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02326-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modified Fisher score is commonly used after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) to estimate hemorrhage burden and support early prognostication, although its accuracy in predicting cognitive outcomes remains limited. This study compares the predictive value of the subjective asessment of aSAH volume through the modified Fisher score with an objetive volumetric quantification in prognosticating cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients with aSAH between 2009 and 2024 and good functional recovery (modified Rankin score ≤ 2) at least 6 months after aSAH. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores normalized to population data, with poor outcomes defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores < 25th percentile for normative data. A semiautomated method was used to quantify hemorrhage volume from presentation on computed tomography scans. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the potential relationship between aSAH volume, clinical variables, and cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 patients with aSAH were included in the study, with 30% of patients (43/142) experiencing poor cognitive outcomes. The objective quantification of hemorrhage volume demonstrated a superior predictive performance compared with the modified Fisher score in determining poor cognitive outcomes (area under the curve 0.75 vs. 0.66, p = 0.037). An aSAH volume cutoff of 24 mL yielded a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 60% in predicting poor cognitive outcomes. Mediation analysis revealed partial mediation by vasospasm in the relationship between hemorrhage volume and poor cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high rate of cognitive impairment among survivors with aSAH with good functional recovery. Volume quantification outperformed the modified Fisher score in predicting cognitive outcomes after aSAH. aSAH volumes more than 24 mL are linked to worse outcomes, with vasospasm contributing to this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Cognitive Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Sagues, Navami Shenoy, Alex Van Dam, Lidia Diaz, Andres Gudino, Carlos Dier, Domenica Cifuentes, Ruben Calle, Linder Wendt, Kathleen Dlouhy, Mario Zanaty, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Natalia Garcia-Casares, Edgar A Samaniego\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02326-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modified Fisher score is commonly used after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) to estimate hemorrhage burden and support early prognostication, although its accuracy in predicting cognitive outcomes remains limited. This study compares the predictive value of the subjective asessment of aSAH volume through the modified Fisher score with an objetive volumetric quantification in prognosticating cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included patients with aSAH between 2009 and 2024 and good functional recovery (modified Rankin score ≤ 2) at least 6 months after aSAH. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores normalized to population data, with poor outcomes defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores < 25th percentile for normative data. A semiautomated method was used to quantify hemorrhage volume from presentation on computed tomography scans. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the potential relationship between aSAH volume, clinical variables, and cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 patients with aSAH were included in the study, with 30% of patients (43/142) experiencing poor cognitive outcomes. The objective quantification of hemorrhage volume demonstrated a superior predictive performance compared with the modified Fisher score in determining poor cognitive outcomes (area under the curve 0.75 vs. 0.66, p = 0.037). An aSAH volume cutoff of 24 mL yielded a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 60% in predicting poor cognitive outcomes. Mediation analysis revealed partial mediation by vasospasm in the relationship between hemorrhage volume and poor cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a high rate of cognitive impairment among survivors with aSAH with good functional recovery. Volume quantification outperformed the modified Fisher score in predicting cognitive outcomes after aSAH. aSAH volumes more than 24 mL are linked to worse outcomes, with vasospasm contributing to this association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02326-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02326-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:改进的Fisher评分通常用于动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后评估出血负担和支持早期预后,尽管其预测认知结果的准确性仍然有限。本研究比较了通过改良Fisher评分主观评估aSAH体积与客观体积量化预测认知结果的预测价值。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入2009年至2024年间aSAH患者,aSAH术后至少6个月功能恢复良好(改良Rankin评分≤2)。认知结果采用蒙特利尔认知评估评分归一化人群数据进行评估,不良结果定义为蒙特利尔认知评估评分。结果:共有142例aSAH患者纳入研究,30%的患者(43/142)出现不良认知结果。与修正Fisher评分相比,出血量的客观量化在判断认知预后不良方面表现出更好的预测性能(曲线下面积0.75 vs. 0.66, p = 0.037)。24ml的aSAH容量临界值在预测不良认知预后方面的敏感性为72%,特异性为60%。中介分析显示血管痉挛在出血量和认知预后差的关系中起部分中介作用。结论:aSAH幸存者认知功能障碍发生率高,功能恢复良好。体积量化在预测aSAH后认知结果方面优于改良Fisher评分。aSAH容量大于24ml与较差的结果相关,血管痉挛与此相关。
Volume of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Cognitive Outcomes.
Background: The modified Fisher score is commonly used after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) to estimate hemorrhage burden and support early prognostication, although its accuracy in predicting cognitive outcomes remains limited. This study compares the predictive value of the subjective asessment of aSAH volume through the modified Fisher score with an objetive volumetric quantification in prognosticating cognitive outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with aSAH between 2009 and 2024 and good functional recovery (modified Rankin score ≤ 2) at least 6 months after aSAH. Cognitive outcomes were assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores normalized to population data, with poor outcomes defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores < 25th percentile for normative data. A semiautomated method was used to quantify hemorrhage volume from presentation on computed tomography scans. Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the potential relationship between aSAH volume, clinical variables, and cognitive outcomes.
Results: A total of 142 patients with aSAH were included in the study, with 30% of patients (43/142) experiencing poor cognitive outcomes. The objective quantification of hemorrhage volume demonstrated a superior predictive performance compared with the modified Fisher score in determining poor cognitive outcomes (area under the curve 0.75 vs. 0.66, p = 0.037). An aSAH volume cutoff of 24 mL yielded a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 60% in predicting poor cognitive outcomes. Mediation analysis revealed partial mediation by vasospasm in the relationship between hemorrhage volume and poor cognitive outcomes.
Conclusions: There is a high rate of cognitive impairment among survivors with aSAH with good functional recovery. Volume quantification outperformed the modified Fisher score in predicting cognitive outcomes after aSAH. aSAH volumes more than 24 mL are linked to worse outcomes, with vasospasm contributing to this association.
期刊介绍:
Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.