马尾硬膜外疾病患者立体定向放射治疗后局部失败和总生存的预后因素:临床、解剖和剂量学分析

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s11060-025-05157-z
Sondos Zayed, Mark Ruschin, Eshetu G Atenafu, Hanbo Chen, Deepak Dinakaran, Jay Detsky, Sten Myrehaug, Hany Soliman, Christopher Witiw, Jeremie Larouche, Pejman Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Chia-Lin Tseng
{"title":"马尾硬膜外疾病患者立体定向放射治疗后局部失败和总生存的预后因素:临床、解剖和剂量学分析","authors":"Sondos Zayed, Mark Ruschin, Eshetu G Atenafu, Hanbo Chen, Deepak Dinakaran, Jay Detsky, Sten Myrehaug, Hany Soliman, Christopher Witiw, Jeremie Larouche, Pejman Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Chia-Lin Tseng","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05157-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The relationship between spine SBRT outcomes and the extent of epidural cauda equina compression (ECEC) by malignant epidural disease has yet to be reported. Our objective was to determine clinical, anatomic and dosimetric factors that predict for local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS) specific to ECEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with ECEC treated with spine SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. ECEC parameters including anatomic measurements, lumbar stenosis grading, anatomic disease position and various dosimetric factors, were analyzed for their prognostic utility. Covariates with a p-value ≤ 0.20 on univariate analysis were selected for multivariable analysis (MVA), and those statistically significant (p < 0.05) were included in the final model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four spinal segments (79 patients) with ECEC were identified, 69 (73%) were intact (non-operated) and 25 (27%) post-operative. MVA identified a significantly lower risk of LF with systemic-therapy prior to SBRT (HR 0.164, p = 0.0005), ECEC encompassing ≤ 1/3 of the circumference of the spinal canal (HR 0.216, p = 0.0194) and an epidural disease volume < 0.45cm<sup>3</sup> (HR 0.000, p < 0.001). In the intact cohort, a greater volume of epidural disease receiving 50 Gy (V50Gy) as an Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy Fractions (EQD2) using an α/β = 10 was associated with a lower LF (HR 0.909, p = 0.0122). Oligometastatic disease and ECEC limited to a single spinal-level were significant prognostic factors for OS in both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The volume and circumferential extent of epidural disease within the spinal canal are important factors for LF in ECEC treated by SBRT, suggesting a possible therapeutic role for surgical cytoreduction to enable optimal treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"621-631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic factors for local failure and overall survival in patients with epidural disease at the cauda equina following stereotactic body radiotherapy: a clinical, anatomic and dosimetric analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sondos Zayed, Mark Ruschin, Eshetu G Atenafu, Hanbo Chen, Deepak Dinakaran, Jay Detsky, Sten Myrehaug, Hany Soliman, Christopher Witiw, Jeremie Larouche, Pejman Maralani, Arjun Sahgal, Chia-Lin Tseng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-05157-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The relationship between spine SBRT outcomes and the extent of epidural cauda equina compression (ECEC) by malignant epidural disease has yet to be reported. Our objective was to determine clinical, anatomic and dosimetric factors that predict for local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS) specific to ECEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with ECEC treated with spine SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. ECEC parameters including anatomic measurements, lumbar stenosis grading, anatomic disease position and various dosimetric factors, were analyzed for their prognostic utility. Covariates with a p-value ≤ 0.20 on univariate analysis were selected for multivariable analysis (MVA), and those statistically significant (p < 0.05) were included in the final model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four spinal segments (79 patients) with ECEC were identified, 69 (73%) were intact (non-operated) and 25 (27%) post-operative. MVA identified a significantly lower risk of LF with systemic-therapy prior to SBRT (HR 0.164, p = 0.0005), ECEC encompassing ≤ 1/3 of the circumference of the spinal canal (HR 0.216, p = 0.0194) and an epidural disease volume < 0.45cm<sup>3</sup> (HR 0.000, p < 0.001). In the intact cohort, a greater volume of epidural disease receiving 50 Gy (V50Gy) as an Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy Fractions (EQD2) using an α/β = 10 was associated with a lower LF (HR 0.909, p = 0.0122). Oligometastatic disease and ECEC limited to a single spinal-level were significant prognostic factors for OS in both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The volume and circumferential extent of epidural disease within the spinal canal are important factors for LF in ECEC treated by SBRT, suggesting a possible therapeutic role for surgical cytoreduction to enable optimal treatment planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"621-631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05157-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05157-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脊柱SBRT结果与恶性硬膜外疾病造成的马尾硬膜外压迫(ECEC)程度的关系尚未报道。我们的目的是确定预测ECEC特异性局部衰竭(LF)和总生存期(OS)的临床、解剖和剂量学因素。方法:对连续接受脊柱SBRT治疗的ECEC患者进行回顾性分析。ECEC参数包括解剖测量、腰椎管狭窄分级、解剖疾病位置和各种剂量学因素,分析其预后效用。选择单因素分析p值≤0.20的协变量进行多变量分析(MVA),并选取具有统计学意义(p)的协变量进行多变量分析(MVA)。结果:发现ECEC患者94个(79例)脊柱节段,69个(73%)脊柱节段完整(未手术),术后25个(27%)脊柱节段完整。MVA识别的风险显著降低低频与之前系统疗法SBRT (HR 0.164, p = 0.0005), ECEC包括≤椎管的周长的1/3 (HR 0.216, p = 0.0194)和硬膜外疾病卷3 (HR 0.000, p结论:体积和周向椎管内硬膜外疾病的严重程度由SBRT低频ECEC治疗的重要因素,建议一个可能的治疗作用外科cytoreduction使最佳治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic factors for local failure and overall survival in patients with epidural disease at the cauda equina following stereotactic body radiotherapy: a clinical, anatomic and dosimetric analysis.

Purpose: The relationship between spine SBRT outcomes and the extent of epidural cauda equina compression (ECEC) by malignant epidural disease has yet to be reported. Our objective was to determine clinical, anatomic and dosimetric factors that predict for local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS) specific to ECEC.

Methods: Consecutive patients with ECEC treated with spine SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. ECEC parameters including anatomic measurements, lumbar stenosis grading, anatomic disease position and various dosimetric factors, were analyzed for their prognostic utility. Covariates with a p-value ≤ 0.20 on univariate analysis were selected for multivariable analysis (MVA), and those statistically significant (p < 0.05) were included in the final model.

Results: Ninety-four spinal segments (79 patients) with ECEC were identified, 69 (73%) were intact (non-operated) and 25 (27%) post-operative. MVA identified a significantly lower risk of LF with systemic-therapy prior to SBRT (HR 0.164, p = 0.0005), ECEC encompassing ≤ 1/3 of the circumference of the spinal canal (HR 0.216, p = 0.0194) and an epidural disease volume < 0.45cm3 (HR 0.000, p < 0.001). In the intact cohort, a greater volume of epidural disease receiving 50 Gy (V50Gy) as an Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy Fractions (EQD2) using an α/β = 10 was associated with a lower LF (HR 0.909, p = 0.0122). Oligometastatic disease and ECEC limited to a single spinal-level were significant prognostic factors for OS in both cohorts.

Conclusion: The volume and circumferential extent of epidural disease within the spinal canal are important factors for LF in ECEC treated by SBRT, suggesting a possible therapeutic role for surgical cytoreduction to enable optimal treatment planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信