超声引导下的甲状旁腺腺瘤细针穿刺活检行甲状旁腺切除术的患者不会导致临床显著的纤维化。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-30 Epub Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-2025-26
Shahzad Ahmad, Evren Lilla, Dylan V Miller, Kallin Austin, Matt Hazel, Ismail Ansari, Berkeley Sheppard, Allison M Butler, Jules Aljammal
{"title":"超声引导下的甲状旁腺腺瘤细针穿刺活检行甲状旁腺切除术的患者不会导致临床显著的纤维化。","authors":"Shahzad Ahmad, Evren Lilla, Dylan V Miller, Kallin Austin, Matt Hazel, Ismail Ansari, Berkeley Sheppard, Allison M Butler, Jules Aljammal","doi":"10.21037/gs-2025-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas (PAs) with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USG-FNA) is a controversial subject due to concerns about fibrosis. This paper attempts to evaluate the impact of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) on PA fibrosis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) undergoing surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review analyzed 70 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT. Forty patients with unequivocal parathyroid lesions underwent USG-FNA using 25- or 27-gauge needles. Postoperatively, an independent pathologist assessed fibrosis in biopsied adenomas in a blinded fashion. Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy without biopsy served as controls. Surgical outcomes and fibrosis scores were compared between the two groups studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in fibrosis scores was observed between biopsied and non-biopsied adenomas by an independent pathologist in cytopathology evaluation (P=0.99). However, ultrasound (US) demonstrated superior localization accuracy (95.8%), in comparison to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Sestamibi (SPECT-Sestamibi) study (50%). Patients with positive FNA parathyroid hormone (PTH) washout had a higher cure rate (95%) compared to those without biopsy proven localization (67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parathyroid FNA biopsy washout with 25- or 27-gauge needles does not cause clinically significant fibrosis. Preoperative localization with positive PTH washout using FNA improves surgical success rates in patients with PHPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 6","pages":"974-982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of parathyroid adenomas in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy does not lead to clinically significant fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Shahzad Ahmad, Evren Lilla, Dylan V Miller, Kallin Austin, Matt Hazel, Ismail Ansari, Berkeley Sheppard, Allison M Butler, Jules Aljammal\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-2025-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas (PAs) with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USG-FNA) is a controversial subject due to concerns about fibrosis. This paper attempts to evaluate the impact of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) on PA fibrosis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) undergoing surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective review analyzed 70 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT. Forty patients with unequivocal parathyroid lesions underwent USG-FNA using 25- or 27-gauge needles. Postoperatively, an independent pathologist assessed fibrosis in biopsied adenomas in a blinded fashion. Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy without biopsy served as controls. Surgical outcomes and fibrosis scores were compared between the two groups studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in fibrosis scores was observed between biopsied and non-biopsied adenomas by an independent pathologist in cytopathology evaluation (P=0.99). However, ultrasound (US) demonstrated superior localization accuracy (95.8%), in comparison to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Sestamibi (SPECT-Sestamibi) study (50%). Patients with positive FNA parathyroid hormone (PTH) washout had a higher cure rate (95%) compared to those without biopsy proven localization (67%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parathyroid FNA biopsy washout with 25- or 27-gauge needles does not cause clinically significant fibrosis. Preoperative localization with positive PTH washout using FNA improves surgical success rates in patients with PHPT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"974-982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261381/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2025-26\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2025-26","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声引导下细针穿刺(USG-FNA)定位甲状旁腺瘤(PAs)是一个有争议的主题,因为担心纤维化。本文试图评价细针穿刺(FNA)对原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症(PHPT)手术切除患者PA纤维化的影响。方法:回顾性分析70例因PHPT行甲状旁腺切除术的患者。40例甲状旁腺明确病变患者使用25或27号针行USG-FNA。术后,独立病理学家采用盲法评估活检腺瘤的纤维化。行甲状旁腺切除术而未行活检的患者作为对照组。比较两组患者的手术结果和纤维化评分。结果:独立病理学家对活检腺瘤和未活检腺瘤进行细胞病理学评估时,纤维化评分无显著差异(P=0.99)。然而,与单光子发射计算机断层扫描- sestamibi (SPECT-Sestamibi)研究(50%)相比,超声(US)显示出更高的定位精度(95.8%)。FNA甲状旁腺激素(PTH)洗脱阳性患者的治愈率(95%)高于未活检证实定位的患者(67%)。结论:25或27号针甲状旁腺FNA活检冲洗不会引起临床显著的纤维化。使用FNA进行PTH冲洗阳性的术前定位可提高PHPT患者的手术成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of parathyroid adenomas in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy does not lead to clinically significant fibrosis.

Background: Preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas (PAs) with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USG-FNA) is a controversial subject due to concerns about fibrosis. This paper attempts to evaluate the impact of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) on PA fibrosis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) undergoing surgical resection.

Methods: This retrospective review analyzed 70 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT. Forty patients with unequivocal parathyroid lesions underwent USG-FNA using 25- or 27-gauge needles. Postoperatively, an independent pathologist assessed fibrosis in biopsied adenomas in a blinded fashion. Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy without biopsy served as controls. Surgical outcomes and fibrosis scores were compared between the two groups studied.

Results: No significant difference in fibrosis scores was observed between biopsied and non-biopsied adenomas by an independent pathologist in cytopathology evaluation (P=0.99). However, ultrasound (US) demonstrated superior localization accuracy (95.8%), in comparison to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Sestamibi (SPECT-Sestamibi) study (50%). Patients with positive FNA parathyroid hormone (PTH) washout had a higher cure rate (95%) compared to those without biopsy proven localization (67%).

Conclusions: Parathyroid FNA biopsy washout with 25- or 27-gauge needles does not cause clinically significant fibrosis. Preoperative localization with positive PTH washout using FNA improves surgical success rates in patients with PHPT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信