{"title":"重生交响曲:放疗后异源乳房重建的回顾性比较队列研究。","authors":"Gianluca Marcaccini, Simone Miccoli, Benedetta Daicampi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Bryan Lim, Ishith Seth, Warren Matthew Rozen, Leonardo Barellini","doi":"10.21037/gs-2024-552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While radiotherapy is a fundamental component of breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer, it can complicate subsequent reconstructive procedures due to its impact on tissue quality. Despite the growing use of implant-based reconstruction, limited data are available on its safety and aesthetic outcomes in patients previously treated with radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of heterologous breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in irradiated patients compared to non-irradiated controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative cohort study included patients who underwent mastectomy with heterologous reconstruction between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those with prior radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for local recurrence (PRS group) and those without prior radiotherapy (NPRS group). All irradiated patients received a standardized regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Reconstructions were performed using either prepectoral or subpectoral techniques, with Ti-Loop<sup>®</sup> mesh used in all prepectoral cases. Only patients who completed the reconstructive process were included. Follow-up focused on early postoperative outcomes within 120 days. Complications and aesthetic results were evaluated, with the latter assessed by an independent plastic surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 patients were included: 15 in the PRS group and 160 in the NPRS group. No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative complication rates, including hematoma (13% PRS <i>vs</i>. 5.6% NPRS, P=0.28), infection (6.6% <i>vs</i>. 5.6%, P>0.99), and wound dehiscence (6.6% <i>vs</i>. 5.6%, P>0.99). Most patients were discharged on the first postoperative day in both groups (80% PRS <i>vs</i>. 81.9% NPRS). Aesthetic scores ≥4 were achieved in 86.7% of PRS and 88% of NPRS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction appears to be a viable option for patients with prior radiotherapy when performed with careful planning and standardized protocols. However, due to the small sample size of the irradiated group and limited follow-up duration, larger and longer-term studies are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 6","pages":"1024-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symphony of rebirth: a retrospective comparative cohort study on heterologous breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Gianluca Marcaccini, Simone Miccoli, Benedetta Daicampi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Bryan Lim, Ishith Seth, Warren Matthew Rozen, Leonardo Barellini\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-2024-552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While radiotherapy is a fundamental component of breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer, it can complicate subsequent reconstructive procedures due to its impact on tissue quality. Despite the growing use of implant-based reconstruction, limited data are available on its safety and aesthetic outcomes in patients previously treated with radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of heterologous breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in irradiated patients compared to non-irradiated controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative cohort study included patients who underwent mastectomy with heterologous reconstruction between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those with prior radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for local recurrence (PRS group) and those without prior radiotherapy (NPRS group). All irradiated patients received a standardized regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Reconstructions were performed using either prepectoral or subpectoral techniques, with Ti-Loop<sup>®</sup> mesh used in all prepectoral cases. Only patients who completed the reconstructive process were included. Follow-up focused on early postoperative outcomes within 120 days. Complications and aesthetic results were evaluated, with the latter assessed by an independent plastic surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 patients were included: 15 in the PRS group and 160 in the NPRS group. No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative complication rates, including hematoma (13% PRS <i>vs</i>. 5.6% NPRS, P=0.28), infection (6.6% <i>vs</i>. 5.6%, P>0.99), and wound dehiscence (6.6% <i>vs</i>. 5.6%, P>0.99). Most patients were discharged on the first postoperative day in both groups (80% PRS <i>vs</i>. 81.9% NPRS). Aesthetic scores ≥4 were achieved in 86.7% of PRS and 88% of NPRS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction appears to be a viable option for patients with prior radiotherapy when performed with careful planning and standardized protocols. However, due to the small sample size of the irradiated group and limited follow-up duration, larger and longer-term studies are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"1024-1032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2024-552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2024-552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然放疗是早期乳腺癌保乳治疗的基本组成部分,但由于其对组织质量的影响,可能使后续重建手术复杂化。尽管种植体重建的使用越来越多,但对于先前接受放射治疗的患者,其安全性和美学结果的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估异体乳房重建的有效性和安全性使用组织扩张和植入物在辐照患者与非辐照对照。方法:这项回顾性比较队列研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年12月期间接受乳房切除术和异体重建的患者。患者分为两组:保乳术后局部复发放疗组(PRS组)和未放疗组(NPRS组)。所有接受放射治疗的患者接受25次50戈瑞的标准治疗。使用胸前或胸下技术进行重建,在所有的胸前病例中使用Ti-Loop®网格。仅包括完成重建过程的患者。随访的重点是120天内的早期术后结果。评估并发症和美学结果,后者由独立整形外科医生评估。结果:共纳入175例患者:PRS组15例,NPRS组160例。术后并发症发生率无统计学差异,包括血肿(13% PRS vs. 5.6% NPRS, P=0.28)、感染(6.6% vs. 5.6%, P>0.99)、创面裂开(6.6% vs. 5.6%, P>0.99)。两组患者术后第一天大部分出院(80% PRS vs. 81.9% NPRS)。86.7%的PRS患者和88%的NPRS患者美学评分≥4分。结论:对于先前接受过放疗的患者,在精心规划和标准化的方案下进行假体乳房重建似乎是一种可行的选择。然而,由于辐照组样本量小,随访时间有限,需要更大规模和更长期的研究来验证这些发现并评估长期并发症。
Symphony of rebirth: a retrospective comparative cohort study on heterologous breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.
Background: While radiotherapy is a fundamental component of breast-conserving therapy for early breast cancer, it can complicate subsequent reconstructive procedures due to its impact on tissue quality. Despite the growing use of implant-based reconstruction, limited data are available on its safety and aesthetic outcomes in patients previously treated with radiotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of heterologous breast reconstruction using tissue expanders and implants in irradiated patients compared to non-irradiated controls.
Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort study included patients who underwent mastectomy with heterologous reconstruction between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those with prior radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for local recurrence (PRS group) and those without prior radiotherapy (NPRS group). All irradiated patients received a standardized regimen of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Reconstructions were performed using either prepectoral or subpectoral techniques, with Ti-Loop® mesh used in all prepectoral cases. Only patients who completed the reconstructive process were included. Follow-up focused on early postoperative outcomes within 120 days. Complications and aesthetic results were evaluated, with the latter assessed by an independent plastic surgeon.
Results: A total of 175 patients were included: 15 in the PRS group and 160 in the NPRS group. No statistically significant differences were found in postoperative complication rates, including hematoma (13% PRS vs. 5.6% NPRS, P=0.28), infection (6.6% vs. 5.6%, P>0.99), and wound dehiscence (6.6% vs. 5.6%, P>0.99). Most patients were discharged on the first postoperative day in both groups (80% PRS vs. 81.9% NPRS). Aesthetic scores ≥4 were achieved in 86.7% of PRS and 88% of NPRS patients.
Conclusions: Implant-based breast reconstruction appears to be a viable option for patients with prior radiotherapy when performed with careful planning and standardized protocols. However, due to the small sample size of the irradiated group and limited follow-up duration, larger and longer-term studies are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term complications.
期刊介绍:
Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.