Erin J Key, Nina K Anderson, Dan Colosi, Mina Mahdian
{"title":"牙髓学锥形束计算机断层扫描:偶然发现和各自的意义。","authors":"Erin J Key, Nina K Anderson, Dan Colosi, Mina Mahdian","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, distribution, and follow-up recommendations of incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired for endodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of limited field-of-view (FOV) CBCT images for endodontic evaluation obtained at the Stony Brook University School of Dental Medicine between 2018-2022. All scans were reviewed by one oral and maxillofacial radiology (OMR) resident and all incidental findings were corroborated with the radiology report approved by one of two board-certified OMRs. Data extracted for each case included age, gender, and reason for scan; and location, diagnosis, and recommended follow-up for each incidental finding. The recommended follow-up consisted of five categories: no recommendation, radiographic monitoring, dental specialty evaluation, medical evaluation, or immediate evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was obtained from 565 CBCT scans with 219 males and 346 females. The mean age was 55.4 ± 18.38. There were 349 maxillary and 216 mandibular scans. The most common incidental finding was mild to moderate mucosal disease (21.4%) then periradicular/periapical odontogenic pathology unrelated to the indication for the scan (15.2%). The most common location for an incidental finding was the gnathic bones (62.2%), then the sino-nasal complex (32.5%). The most common follow-up recommendation was dental specialty evaluation (46.2%). Twenty-five findings (2.3%) were subject to immediate follow-up recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incidental findings were found in 90.5% of CBCT scans acquired for endodontic purposes. Medical evaluation or immediate evaluation was recommended for a combined 6.4% of incidental findings. Together, these findings highlight the importance of a thorough review of the entire scan by a trained specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Endodontics: Incidental Findings and Respective Significance.\",\"authors\":\"Erin J Key, Nina K Anderson, Dan Colosi, Mina Mahdian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twaf055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, distribution, and follow-up recommendations of incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired for endodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of limited field-of-view (FOV) CBCT images for endodontic evaluation obtained at the Stony Brook University School of Dental Medicine between 2018-2022. All scans were reviewed by one oral and maxillofacial radiology (OMR) resident and all incidental findings were corroborated with the radiology report approved by one of two board-certified OMRs. Data extracted for each case included age, gender, and reason for scan; and location, diagnosis, and recommended follow-up for each incidental finding. The recommended follow-up consisted of five categories: no recommendation, radiographic monitoring, dental specialty evaluation, medical evaluation, or immediate evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was obtained from 565 CBCT scans with 219 males and 346 females. The mean age was 55.4 ± 18.38. There were 349 maxillary and 216 mandibular scans. The most common incidental finding was mild to moderate mucosal disease (21.4%) then periradicular/periapical odontogenic pathology unrelated to the indication for the scan (15.2%). The most common location for an incidental finding was the gnathic bones (62.2%), then the sino-nasal complex (32.5%). The most common follow-up recommendation was dental specialty evaluation (46.2%). Twenty-five findings (2.3%) were subject to immediate follow-up recommendation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incidental findings were found in 90.5% of CBCT scans acquired for endodontic purposes. Medical evaluation or immediate evaluation was recommended for a combined 6.4% of incidental findings. Together, these findings highlight the importance of a thorough review of the entire scan by a trained specialist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Endodontics: Incidental Findings and Respective Significance.
Background: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, distribution, and follow-up recommendations of incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired for endodontic treatment.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of limited field-of-view (FOV) CBCT images for endodontic evaluation obtained at the Stony Brook University School of Dental Medicine between 2018-2022. All scans were reviewed by one oral and maxillofacial radiology (OMR) resident and all incidental findings were corroborated with the radiology report approved by one of two board-certified OMRs. Data extracted for each case included age, gender, and reason for scan; and location, diagnosis, and recommended follow-up for each incidental finding. The recommended follow-up consisted of five categories: no recommendation, radiographic monitoring, dental specialty evaluation, medical evaluation, or immediate evaluation.
Results: Data was obtained from 565 CBCT scans with 219 males and 346 females. The mean age was 55.4 ± 18.38. There were 349 maxillary and 216 mandibular scans. The most common incidental finding was mild to moderate mucosal disease (21.4%) then periradicular/periapical odontogenic pathology unrelated to the indication for the scan (15.2%). The most common location for an incidental finding was the gnathic bones (62.2%), then the sino-nasal complex (32.5%). The most common follow-up recommendation was dental specialty evaluation (46.2%). Twenty-five findings (2.3%) were subject to immediate follow-up recommendation.
Conclusions: Incidental findings were found in 90.5% of CBCT scans acquired for endodontic purposes. Medical evaluation or immediate evaluation was recommended for a combined 6.4% of incidental findings. Together, these findings highlight the importance of a thorough review of the entire scan by a trained specialist.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X