Philippe Armand, Pier Luigi Zinzani, John M Timmerman, Nathalie A Johnson, David Lavie, Kannan Thiagarajan, Brian Topp, Pallavi M Pillai, Alex F Herrera
{"title":"相对于派姆单抗,估计favezelimab联合派姆单抗治疗pd -1难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效。","authors":"Philippe Armand, Pier Luigi Zinzani, John M Timmerman, Nathalie A Johnson, David Lavie, Kannan Thiagarajan, Brian Topp, Pallavi M Pillai, Alex F Herrera","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had promising efficacy in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in MK-4280-003; however, the contribution of favezelimab was unclear. Here, we assessed the relative contribution of favezelimab by comparison with data from participants treated with only pembrolizumab beyond progression in KEYNOTE-087. Participants in MK-4280-003 had received ≥2 doses of anti-PD-1 therapy and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants eligible from KEYNOTE-087 had received >2 doses of pembrolizumab beyond progression and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus favezelimab 200 mg or 800 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Change in target lesion size and response per International Working Group 2007 criteria were assessed. Baseline tumor size was reset at first progression for KEYNOTE-087. A bootstrapping method compared change in target lesion size between groups. Twenty-seven participants from MK-4280-003 and 81 from KEYNOTE-087 were included. Objective response rates were 37% (95% CI, 15-51) for favezelimab plus pembrolizumab and 2% (95% CI, 0-6) for pembrolizumab alone. A clinically meaningful reduction (≥50%) in target lesion size was observed in 13 (48%) vs 4 (5%) participants, respectively. Mean change from baseline in target lesion size was -49% and -0.4%. In the bootstrapping analysis, 99.4% of samples showed greater decrease in tumor burden with favezelimab plus pembrolizumab. Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had a higher response rate and greater reduction in tumor burden vs pembrolizumab alone in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma, suggesting favezelimab contributed substantially to efficacy in MK-4280-003. NCT03598608, NCT02453594.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating efficacy of favezelimab plus pembrolizumab relative to pembrolizumab in anti-PD-1-refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Armand, Pier Luigi Zinzani, John M Timmerman, Nathalie A Johnson, David Lavie, Kannan Thiagarajan, Brian Topp, Pallavi M Pillai, Alex F Herrera\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had promising efficacy in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in MK-4280-003; however, the contribution of favezelimab was unclear. Here, we assessed the relative contribution of favezelimab by comparison with data from participants treated with only pembrolizumab beyond progression in KEYNOTE-087. Participants in MK-4280-003 had received ≥2 doses of anti-PD-1 therapy and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants eligible from KEYNOTE-087 had received >2 doses of pembrolizumab beyond progression and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus favezelimab 200 mg or 800 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Change in target lesion size and response per International Working Group 2007 criteria were assessed. Baseline tumor size was reset at first progression for KEYNOTE-087. A bootstrapping method compared change in target lesion size between groups. Twenty-seven participants from MK-4280-003 and 81 from KEYNOTE-087 were included. Objective response rates were 37% (95% CI, 15-51) for favezelimab plus pembrolizumab and 2% (95% CI, 0-6) for pembrolizumab alone. A clinically meaningful reduction (≥50%) in target lesion size was observed in 13 (48%) vs 4 (5%) participants, respectively. Mean change from baseline in target lesion size was -49% and -0.4%. In the bootstrapping analysis, 99.4% of samples showed greater decrease in tumor burden with favezelimab plus pembrolizumab. Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had a higher response rate and greater reduction in tumor burden vs pembrolizumab alone in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma, suggesting favezelimab contributed substantially to efficacy in MK-4280-003. NCT03598608, NCT02453594.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014654\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014654","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating efficacy of favezelimab plus pembrolizumab relative to pembrolizumab in anti-PD-1-refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.
Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had promising efficacy in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in MK-4280-003; however, the contribution of favezelimab was unclear. Here, we assessed the relative contribution of favezelimab by comparison with data from participants treated with only pembrolizumab beyond progression in KEYNOTE-087. Participants in MK-4280-003 had received ≥2 doses of anti-PD-1 therapy and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants eligible from KEYNOTE-087 had received >2 doses of pembrolizumab beyond progression and progressed <12 weeks of last dose. Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus favezelimab 200 mg or 800 mg or pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Change in target lesion size and response per International Working Group 2007 criteria were assessed. Baseline tumor size was reset at first progression for KEYNOTE-087. A bootstrapping method compared change in target lesion size between groups. Twenty-seven participants from MK-4280-003 and 81 from KEYNOTE-087 were included. Objective response rates were 37% (95% CI, 15-51) for favezelimab plus pembrolizumab and 2% (95% CI, 0-6) for pembrolizumab alone. A clinically meaningful reduction (≥50%) in target lesion size was observed in 13 (48%) vs 4 (5%) participants, respectively. Mean change from baseline in target lesion size was -49% and -0.4%. In the bootstrapping analysis, 99.4% of samples showed greater decrease in tumor burden with favezelimab plus pembrolizumab. Favezelimab plus pembrolizumab had a higher response rate and greater reduction in tumor burden vs pembrolizumab alone in anti-PD-1-refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma, suggesting favezelimab contributed substantially to efficacy in MK-4280-003. NCT03598608, NCT02453594.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.