高剪力梁双柱弯的理论计算与设计方法经仿真与试验验证

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Wen Xie, Chongjie Jin, Yangfan Hong, Limin Sun
{"title":"高剪力梁双柱弯的理论计算与设计方法经仿真与试验验证","authors":"Wen Xie,&nbsp;Chongjie Jin,&nbsp;Yangfan Hong,&nbsp;Limin Sun","doi":"10.1155/stc/7736709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Dual-column bents with energy dissipation components represent one structural type of seismic resilient bridge bents. However, there have been few dynamic analyses and shaking table tests to validate the theoretical formulas, design methodology, and the seismic effects of the energy dissipation elements on dual-column bents, particularly for the tall dual-column bents. Thus, the study aims to derive theoretical formulas for calculating the yield strength, yield displacement, and elastic stiffness of tall dual-column bents with and without shear beams (SBs). This enables a more comprehensive understanding of structural performance and allows for more accurate predictions of the seismic behavior of these novel bents during seismic events compared to existing studies. A structural fuse-based design methodology for tall dual-column bents was developed and validated through verified finite element models and shaking table tests. Both numerical and experimental analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of SBs in mitigating seismic damage and responses in tall dual-column bents. The displacements and curvatures of the tall dual-column bents with and without SBs were analyzed. The results show that SBs enhance the seismic resilience and decrease the seismic responses of tall dual-column bents by strategically yielding first to dissipate energy, achieving up to 69.5% displacement reduction under E1-level earthquakes (PGA = 0.40 g) and 77.6% curvature reduction under E2-level earthquakes (PGA = 0.68 g) compared to tall dual-column bents without SBs. Crucially, this prioritized yielding mechanism enables SBs to function as structural fuses, suppressing structural responses below critical yield thresholds and safeguarding columns. Consequently, the tall dual-column bent without SBs undergoes seismic damage under E1-level earthquakes, while the tall dual-column bent with SBs does not suffer any damage. SBs enable the tall dual-column bent to meet performance targets. This suggests that SBs notably enhance the seismic resilience of tall dual-column bents, and the proposed design method can be used to design actual engineering structures.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49471,"journal":{"name":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/7736709","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Calculation and the Design Method of Tall Dual-Column Bents With Shear Beams Validated by Simulations and Tests\",\"authors\":\"Wen Xie,&nbsp;Chongjie Jin,&nbsp;Yangfan Hong,&nbsp;Limin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/stc/7736709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Dual-column bents with energy dissipation components represent one structural type of seismic resilient bridge bents. However, there have been few dynamic analyses and shaking table tests to validate the theoretical formulas, design methodology, and the seismic effects of the energy dissipation elements on dual-column bents, particularly for the tall dual-column bents. Thus, the study aims to derive theoretical formulas for calculating the yield strength, yield displacement, and elastic stiffness of tall dual-column bents with and without shear beams (SBs). This enables a more comprehensive understanding of structural performance and allows for more accurate predictions of the seismic behavior of these novel bents during seismic events compared to existing studies. A structural fuse-based design methodology for tall dual-column bents was developed and validated through verified finite element models and shaking table tests. Both numerical and experimental analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of SBs in mitigating seismic damage and responses in tall dual-column bents. The displacements and curvatures of the tall dual-column bents with and without SBs were analyzed. The results show that SBs enhance the seismic resilience and decrease the seismic responses of tall dual-column bents by strategically yielding first to dissipate energy, achieving up to 69.5% displacement reduction under E1-level earthquakes (PGA = 0.40 g) and 77.6% curvature reduction under E2-level earthquakes (PGA = 0.68 g) compared to tall dual-column bents without SBs. Crucially, this prioritized yielding mechanism enables SBs to function as structural fuses, suppressing structural responses below critical yield thresholds and safeguarding columns. Consequently, the tall dual-column bent without SBs undergoes seismic damage under E1-level earthquakes, while the tall dual-column bent with SBs does not suffer any damage. SBs enable the tall dual-column bent to meet performance targets. This suggests that SBs notably enhance the seismic resilience of tall dual-column bents, and the proposed design method can be used to design actual engineering structures.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Control & Health Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/stc/7736709\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Control & Health Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/7736709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Control & Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/stc/7736709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

带消能构件的双柱弯矩是桥梁抗震抗弯的一种结构形式。然而,很少有动力分析和振动台试验来验证理论公式、设计方法以及耗能元件对双柱弯管的地震影响,特别是对高双柱弯管。因此,本研究旨在推导出计算有剪力梁和无剪力梁的高双柱弯的屈服强度、屈服位移和弹性刚度的理论公式。与现有研究相比,这可以更全面地了解结构性能,并可以更准确地预测地震事件中这些新型弯曲的地震行为。提出了一种基于结构保险丝的高双柱弯管设计方法,并通过验证有限元模型和振动台试验进行了验证。通过数值分析和试验分析,评价了SBs对高双柱弯的震害和反应的有效性。分析了高双柱弯在加和不加SBs时的位移和曲率。结果表明:与不加SBs的高双柱弯相比,SBs通过战略性地先屈服以耗散能量,提高了高双柱弯的抗震恢复能力,降低了高双柱弯的地震反应,在e1级地震(PGA = 0.40 g)下位移减少69.5%,在e2级地震(PGA = 0.68 g)下曲率减少77.6%。至关重要的是,这种优先屈服机制使SBs能够发挥结构引信的作用,抑制低于临界屈服阈值的结构反应,并保护柱子。因此,在e1级地震作用下,不含SBs的高双柱弯曲结构受到地震破坏,而含SBs的高双柱弯曲结构没有受到地震破坏。SBs使高双柱弯管达到性能目标。这表明SBs显著提高了高双柱弯道的抗震性能,所提出的设计方法可用于实际工程结构的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Theoretical Calculation and the Design Method of Tall Dual-Column Bents With Shear Beams Validated by Simulations and Tests

Theoretical Calculation and the Design Method of Tall Dual-Column Bents With Shear Beams Validated by Simulations and Tests

Dual-column bents with energy dissipation components represent one structural type of seismic resilient bridge bents. However, there have been few dynamic analyses and shaking table tests to validate the theoretical formulas, design methodology, and the seismic effects of the energy dissipation elements on dual-column bents, particularly for the tall dual-column bents. Thus, the study aims to derive theoretical formulas for calculating the yield strength, yield displacement, and elastic stiffness of tall dual-column bents with and without shear beams (SBs). This enables a more comprehensive understanding of structural performance and allows for more accurate predictions of the seismic behavior of these novel bents during seismic events compared to existing studies. A structural fuse-based design methodology for tall dual-column bents was developed and validated through verified finite element models and shaking table tests. Both numerical and experimental analyses were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of SBs in mitigating seismic damage and responses in tall dual-column bents. The displacements and curvatures of the tall dual-column bents with and without SBs were analyzed. The results show that SBs enhance the seismic resilience and decrease the seismic responses of tall dual-column bents by strategically yielding first to dissipate energy, achieving up to 69.5% displacement reduction under E1-level earthquakes (PGA = 0.40 g) and 77.6% curvature reduction under E2-level earthquakes (PGA = 0.68 g) compared to tall dual-column bents without SBs. Crucially, this prioritized yielding mechanism enables SBs to function as structural fuses, suppressing structural responses below critical yield thresholds and safeguarding columns. Consequently, the tall dual-column bent without SBs undergoes seismic damage under E1-level earthquakes, while the tall dual-column bent with SBs does not suffer any damage. SBs enable the tall dual-column bent to meet performance targets. This suggests that SBs notably enhance the seismic resilience of tall dual-column bents, and the proposed design method can be used to design actual engineering structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Control & Health Monitoring
Structural Control & Health Monitoring 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
234
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal Structural Control and Health Monitoring encompasses all theoretical and technological aspects of structural control, structural health monitoring theory and smart materials and structures. The journal focuses on aerospace, civil, infrastructure and mechanical engineering applications. Original contributions based on analytical, computational and experimental methods are solicited in three main areas: monitoring, control, and smart materials and structures, covering subjects such as system identification, health monitoring, health diagnostics, multi-functional materials, signal processing, sensor technology, passive, active and semi active control schemes and implementations, shape memory alloys, piezoelectrics and mechatronics. Also of interest are actuator design, dynamic systems, dynamic stability, artificial intelligence tools, data acquisition, wireless communications, measurements, MEMS/NEMS sensors for local damage detection, optical fibre sensors for health monitoring, remote control of monitoring systems, sensor-logger combinations for mobile applications, corrosion sensors, scour indicators and experimental techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信