Jean A. Talbot PhD, MPH, Celia Jewell BSN, MPH, Brianna Holston BSPH, Joshua Plavin MD, MPH, FAAP, Gail L. Rose PhD, Erika C. Ziller PhD
{"title":"成人慢性疼痛患病率的城乡差异:与人口统计学和社会经济特征的关联","authors":"Jean A. Talbot PhD, MPH, Celia Jewell BSN, MPH, Brianna Holston BSPH, Joshua Plavin MD, MPH, FAAP, Gail L. Rose PhD, Erika C. Ziller PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To explore rural-urban differences in chronic pain prevalence among adults in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study analyzed pooled data from the 2019-2021 and 2023 National Health Interview Survey. We used chi-square tests and logistic regression to determine how rurality of residence was associated with chronic pain prevalence among adults aged 18 and older before and after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic variables. STROBE reporting guidelines were applied.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Unadjusted prevalence of chronic pain was 29% for rural adults and 21% for their urban counterparts (<i>P</i> <.0001). After control for covariates, rural-urban differences decreased but remained statistically significant. Adjusted odds of chronic pain were 9% higher in rural than in urban populations (<i>P</i> <.01). Adjusted chronic pain prevalence was 23% for rural and 22% for urban adults (<i>P</i> <.01). Multivariable analyses suggested that rural-urban prevalence differences were related to risk factors that were more common in rural populations, including older age, current or past married status, lower income, lower education levels, and non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The substantial rural-urban disparity in chronic pain prevalence is partly associated with demographic and socioeconomic risk factors correlated with rurality. Persisting rural-urban differences in adjusted chronic pain prevalence may also be correlated with barriers limiting rural residents’ access to guideline-concordant pain management. Innovations in delivery systems and payment policies may help to reduce these barriers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of chronic pain in adults: Associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics\",\"authors\":\"Jean A. Talbot PhD, MPH, Celia Jewell BSN, MPH, Brianna Holston BSPH, Joshua Plavin MD, MPH, FAAP, Gail L. Rose PhD, Erika C. Ziller PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore rural-urban differences in chronic pain prevalence among adults in the United States.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study analyzed pooled data from the 2019-2021 and 2023 National Health Interview Survey. We used chi-square tests and logistic regression to determine how rurality of residence was associated with chronic pain prevalence among adults aged 18 and older before and after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic variables. STROBE reporting guidelines were applied.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unadjusted prevalence of chronic pain was 29% for rural adults and 21% for their urban counterparts (<i>P</i> <.0001). After control for covariates, rural-urban differences decreased but remained statistically significant. Adjusted odds of chronic pain were 9% higher in rural than in urban populations (<i>P</i> <.01). Adjusted chronic pain prevalence was 23% for rural and 22% for urban adults (<i>P</i> <.01). Multivariable analyses suggested that rural-urban prevalence differences were related to risk factors that were more common in rural populations, including older age, current or past married status, lower income, lower education levels, and non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The substantial rural-urban disparity in chronic pain prevalence is partly associated with demographic and socioeconomic risk factors correlated with rurality. Persisting rural-urban differences in adjusted chronic pain prevalence may also be correlated with barriers limiting rural residents’ access to guideline-concordant pain management. Innovations in delivery systems and payment policies may help to reduce these barriers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of chronic pain in adults: Associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics
Purpose
To explore rural-urban differences in chronic pain prevalence among adults in the United States.
Methods
This cross-sectional study analyzed pooled data from the 2019-2021 and 2023 National Health Interview Survey. We used chi-square tests and logistic regression to determine how rurality of residence was associated with chronic pain prevalence among adults aged 18 and older before and after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic variables. STROBE reporting guidelines were applied.
Findings
Unadjusted prevalence of chronic pain was 29% for rural adults and 21% for their urban counterparts (P <.0001). After control for covariates, rural-urban differences decreased but remained statistically significant. Adjusted odds of chronic pain were 9% higher in rural than in urban populations (P <.01). Adjusted chronic pain prevalence was 23% for rural and 22% for urban adults (P <.01). Multivariable analyses suggested that rural-urban prevalence differences were related to risk factors that were more common in rural populations, including older age, current or past married status, lower income, lower education levels, and non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity.
Conclusions
The substantial rural-urban disparity in chronic pain prevalence is partly associated with demographic and socioeconomic risk factors correlated with rurality. Persisting rural-urban differences in adjusted chronic pain prevalence may also be correlated with barriers limiting rural residents’ access to guideline-concordant pain management. Innovations in delivery systems and payment policies may help to reduce these barriers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.