骨科手术全麻后小儿出现性谵妄:康奈尔小儿谵妄评估的繁体中文版心理测量学特征。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Yi-Chen Chen, Jann Foster, Man-Ling Wang, Anne Marks, Virginia Schmied, Kai-Mei Chang, Hong-Guang Su, Nan-Hsuan Tsao, Hsiao-Yean Chiu
{"title":"骨科手术全麻后小儿出现性谵妄:康奈尔小儿谵妄评估的繁体中文版心理测量学特征。","authors":"Yi-Chen Chen, Jann Foster, Man-Ling Wang, Anne Marks, Virginia Schmied, Kai-Mei Chang, Hong-Guang Su, Nan-Hsuan Tsao, Hsiao-Yean Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Children undergoing general anesthesia have a considerably high risk of emergence delirium (ED), which is a long-underestimated condition. The purpose of this study was to translate and validate the CAPD into traditional Chinese (CAPD-TC), for use with pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children who underwent elective orthopedic surgery and were admitted to postanesthesia care units in Taiwan between October 2023 and July 2024 were included. ED was evaluated using the traditional Chinese version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD-TC) concerning delirium diagnostic criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision. We tested construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis and assessed known-group validity by comparing CAPD-TC scores across age (preschool vs school age) and pain severity (mild vs moderate-to-severe). Internal reliability, inter-rater reliability, and diagnostic accuracy were also evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 200 children (aged 2 to 12 years, mean age: 9.2 years) were included. In accordance to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision criteria, 34.5% developed ED. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure with an acceptable model fit. CAPD-TC revealed high known-group validity for pain severity and age with reliability analysis of Cronbach's α of 0.83 and inter-rater reliability of 0.88. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 11 points and an area under the curve of 0.95, sensitivity of 97.0%, and specificity of 76.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAPD-TC effectively detects ED during the anesthesia recovery phase in children undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Our findings indicate CAPD-TC as a reliable tool for timely ED assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Emergence Delirium Following General Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgery: Psychometric Properties of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Chen Chen, Jann Foster, Man-Ling Wang, Anne Marks, Virginia Schmied, Kai-Mei Chang, Hong-Guang Su, Nan-Hsuan Tsao, Hsiao-Yean Chiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Children undergoing general anesthesia have a considerably high risk of emergence delirium (ED), which is a long-underestimated condition. The purpose of this study was to translate and validate the CAPD into traditional Chinese (CAPD-TC), for use with pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children who underwent elective orthopedic surgery and were admitted to postanesthesia care units in Taiwan between October 2023 and July 2024 were included. ED was evaluated using the traditional Chinese version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD-TC) concerning delirium diagnostic criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision. We tested construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis and assessed known-group validity by comparing CAPD-TC scores across age (preschool vs school age) and pain severity (mild vs moderate-to-severe). Internal reliability, inter-rater reliability, and diagnostic accuracy were also evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 200 children (aged 2 to 12 years, mean age: 9.2 years) were included. In accordance to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision criteria, 34.5% developed ED. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure with an acceptable model fit. CAPD-TC revealed high known-group validity for pain severity and age with reliability analysis of Cronbach's α of 0.83 and inter-rater reliability of 0.88. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 11 points and an area under the curve of 0.95, sensitivity of 97.0%, and specificity of 76.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CAPD-TC effectively detects ED during the anesthesia recovery phase in children undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Our findings indicate CAPD-TC as a reliable tool for timely ED assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:接受全身麻醉的儿童有相当高的出现性谵妄(ED)的风险,这是一个长期被低估的条件。本研究的目的是将CAPD翻译并验证为繁体中文(CAPD- tc),用于接受全麻的儿童择期骨科手术。设计:前瞻性观察性研究。方法:选取2023年10月至2024年7月在台湾接受麻醉后护理病房择期骨科手术的患儿。采用中文版康奈尔儿童谵妄评估(CAPD-TC),参照《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版中列出的谵妄诊断标准,对ED进行评估。我们用验证性因子分析来检验结构效度,并通过比较CAPD-TC评分在不同年龄(学龄前与学龄)和疼痛严重程度(轻度与中度至重度)来评估已知组效度。内部信度、内部信度和诊断准确性也采用受试者工作特征曲线分析进行评估。结果:共纳入200例儿童(年龄2 ~ 12岁,平均年龄9.2岁)。根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版文本修订标准,34.5%的患者出现ED。验证性因子分析显示三因素结构具有可接受的模型拟合。CAPD-TC对疼痛严重程度和年龄的已知组效度较高,Cronbach's α信度为0.83,评分间信度为0.88。受试者工作特征分析确定最佳截断点为11点,曲线下面积为0.95,敏感性为97.0%,特异性为76.0%。结论:CAPD-TC可有效检测择期骨科手术患儿麻醉恢复阶段的ED。我们的研究结果表明CAPD-TC是及时评估ED的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Emergence Delirium Following General Anesthesia for Orthopedic Surgery: Psychometric Properties of the Traditional Chinese Version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium.

Purpose: Children undergoing general anesthesia have a considerably high risk of emergence delirium (ED), which is a long-underestimated condition. The purpose of this study was to translate and validate the CAPD into traditional Chinese (CAPD-TC), for use with pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective orthopedic surgery.

Design: A prospective observational study.

Methods: Children who underwent elective orthopedic surgery and were admitted to postanesthesia care units in Taiwan between October 2023 and July 2024 were included. ED was evaluated using the traditional Chinese version of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD-TC) concerning delirium diagnostic criteria outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision. We tested construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis and assessed known-group validity by comparing CAPD-TC scores across age (preschool vs school age) and pain severity (mild vs moderate-to-severe). Internal reliability, inter-rater reliability, and diagnostic accuracy were also evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Findings: A total of 200 children (aged 2 to 12 years, mean age: 9.2 years) were included. In accordance to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision criteria, 34.5% developed ED. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure with an acceptable model fit. CAPD-TC revealed high known-group validity for pain severity and age with reliability analysis of Cronbach's α of 0.83 and inter-rater reliability of 0.88. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 11 points and an area under the curve of 0.95, sensitivity of 97.0%, and specificity of 76.0%.

Conclusions: The CAPD-TC effectively detects ED during the anesthesia recovery phase in children undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Our findings indicate CAPD-TC as a reliable tool for timely ED assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信