YouTube上手术视频的教育价值——阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术视频子宫切除术的质量评估及标准的制定。

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Esra Ayanoglu, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Pınar Birol Ilter, Memiş Ali Mutlu, Murat Yassa, Cihan Kaya, Niyazi Tug
{"title":"YouTube上手术视频的教育价值——阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术视频子宫切除术的质量评估及标准的制定。","authors":"Esra Ayanoglu, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Pınar Birol Ilter, Memiş Ali Mutlu, Murat Yassa, Cihan Kaya, Niyazi Tug","doi":"10.48095/cccg2025194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the reliability and educational value of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy videos on YouTube and their suitability for training surgeons.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On June 12, 2024, YouTube was searched using the keywords \"vNOTES hysterectomy,\" \"TVNOTES hysterectomy,\" \"transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy,\" \"vNOTES,\" and \"vaginal notes hysterectomy.\" A total of 73 videos met the inclusion criteria. Viewer engagement metrics, such as time since upload, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video duration were recorded. Ratios such as a view ratio, a like ratio, and Video Power Index (VPI) were calculated. The videos were categorized by the modified Global Quality Scale (GQS) and evaluated based on a scoring system derived from a standardized 10-step vNOTES hysterectomy procedure, with scores ranging from 0 to 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 73 videos, 40 (53.8%) were categorized as poor quality, 13 (17.8%) as moderate, and 20 (27.4%) as good. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of time since upload, views, dislikes, comments, or a like ratio. However, videos in the good-quality group had a significantly higher number of likes and VPI scores. Critical elements such as patient preparation and positioning, setup of the operation room, circumcision of the cervix, and vault closure were inadequately addressed in lower-quality videos. Videos with a didactic voice had significantly more views, likes, and comments than those with music or no sound. No significant correlations were found between video length and engagement metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of vNOTES hysterectomy videos (53.8%) on YouTube lack comprehensive educational content, with only a small fraction deemed appropriate for surgical training. The interest rates of the viewers may not be correlated with the usefulness rates of the videos. Surgeons and organizations should focus on producing high-quality, peer-reviewed instructional videos to improve the educational value of YouTube as a resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"90 3","pages":"194-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube - quality assessment of and set of standards for hysterectomy using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery videos.\",\"authors\":\"Esra Ayanoglu, Arzu Bilge Tekin, Pınar Birol Ilter, Memiş Ali Mutlu, Murat Yassa, Cihan Kaya, Niyazi Tug\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/cccg2025194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the reliability and educational value of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy videos on YouTube and their suitability for training surgeons.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>On June 12, 2024, YouTube was searched using the keywords \\\"vNOTES hysterectomy,\\\" \\\"TVNOTES hysterectomy,\\\" \\\"transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy,\\\" \\\"vNOTES,\\\" and \\\"vaginal notes hysterectomy.\\\" A total of 73 videos met the inclusion criteria. Viewer engagement metrics, such as time since upload, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video duration were recorded. Ratios such as a view ratio, a like ratio, and Video Power Index (VPI) were calculated. The videos were categorized by the modified Global Quality Scale (GQS) and evaluated based on a scoring system derived from a standardized 10-step vNOTES hysterectomy procedure, with scores ranging from 0 to 15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 73 videos, 40 (53.8%) were categorized as poor quality, 13 (17.8%) as moderate, and 20 (27.4%) as good. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of time since upload, views, dislikes, comments, or a like ratio. However, videos in the good-quality group had a significantly higher number of likes and VPI scores. Critical elements such as patient preparation and positioning, setup of the operation room, circumcision of the cervix, and vault closure were inadequately addressed in lower-quality videos. Videos with a didactic voice had significantly more views, likes, and comments than those with music or no sound. No significant correlations were found between video length and engagement metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of vNOTES hysterectomy videos (53.8%) on YouTube lack comprehensive educational content, with only a small fraction deemed appropriate for surgical training. The interest rates of the viewers may not be correlated with the usefulness rates of the videos. Surgeons and organizations should focus on producing high-quality, peer-reviewed instructional videos to improve the educational value of YouTube as a resource.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"194-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2025194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2025194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估YouTube上阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)子宫切除术视频的可靠性和教育价值及其对外科医生培训的适用性。材料和方法:2024年6月12日,在YouTube上搜索关键词“vNOTES子宫切除术”、“TVNOTES子宫切除术”、“经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜子宫切除术”、“vNOTES”和“阴道notes子宫切除术”。共有73个视频符合入选标准。观众参与指标,如上传时间、观看次数、喜欢、不喜欢、评论和视频持续时间被记录下来。计算了观看比、相似比和视频功率指数(VPI)等比率。这些视频通过改进的全球质量量表(GQS)进行分类,并根据标准化的10步子宫切除手术vNOTES的评分系统进行评估,评分范围从0到15。结果:在73个视频中,40个(53.8%)被分类为质量差,13个(17.8%)被分类为中等,20个(27.4%)被分类为良好。在上传、观看、不喜欢、评论或点赞比率方面,两组之间没有发现显著差异。然而,高质量组的视频有更高的点赞数和VPI分数。在质量较低的视频中,诸如患者准备和定位、手术室设置、宫颈包皮环切术和穹窿闭合等关键因素没有得到充分解决。有教学声音的视频比有音乐或没有声音的视频有更多的观看、点赞和评论。视频长度和用户粘性指标之间没有明显的相关性。结论:YouTube上绝大多数(53.8%)的vNOTES子宫切除术视频缺乏全面的教育内容,只有一小部分被认为适合手术培训。观众的利率可能与视频的有用率无关。外科医生和组织应该专注于制作高质量的、同行评议的教学视频,以提高YouTube作为一种资源的教育价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube - quality assessment of and set of standards for hysterectomy using vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery videos.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the reliability and educational value of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy videos on YouTube and their suitability for training surgeons.

Materials and methods: On June 12, 2024, YouTube was searched using the keywords "vNOTES hysterectomy," "TVNOTES hysterectomy," "transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy," "vNOTES," and "vaginal notes hysterectomy." A total of 73 videos met the inclusion criteria. Viewer engagement metrics, such as time since upload, number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, and video duration were recorded. Ratios such as a view ratio, a like ratio, and Video Power Index (VPI) were calculated. The videos were categorized by the modified Global Quality Scale (GQS) and evaluated based on a scoring system derived from a standardized 10-step vNOTES hysterectomy procedure, with scores ranging from 0 to 15.

Results: Out of 73 videos, 40 (53.8%) were categorized as poor quality, 13 (17.8%) as moderate, and 20 (27.4%) as good. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of time since upload, views, dislikes, comments, or a like ratio. However, videos in the good-quality group had a significantly higher number of likes and VPI scores. Critical elements such as patient preparation and positioning, setup of the operation room, circumcision of the cervix, and vault closure were inadequately addressed in lower-quality videos. Videos with a didactic voice had significantly more views, likes, and comments than those with music or no sound. No significant correlations were found between video length and engagement metrics.

Conclusion: The majority of vNOTES hysterectomy videos (53.8%) on YouTube lack comprehensive educational content, with only a small fraction deemed appropriate for surgical training. The interest rates of the viewers may not be correlated with the usefulness rates of the videos. Surgeons and organizations should focus on producing high-quality, peer-reviewed instructional videos to improve the educational value of YouTube as a resource.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信