远程缺血预处理预防动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者血管痉挛引起的延迟性脑缺血。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Carolin Albrecht, Teresa Silvestri, Maria Wostrack, Christian Maegerlein, Insa Janssen, Jan Martin, Bernhard Meyer, Arthur Wagner, Jens Gempt
{"title":"远程缺血预处理预防动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者血管痉挛引起的延迟性脑缺血。","authors":"Carolin Albrecht, Teresa Silvestri, Maria Wostrack, Christian Maegerlein, Insa Janssen, Jan Martin, Bernhard Meyer, Arthur Wagner, Jens Gempt","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02324-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has shown potential in reducing vasospasm-induced secondary ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Research suggests RIPC may help the brain adapt to periods of reduced blood flow, thereby reducing the risk of cerebral infarction secondary to delayed cerebral ischemia. This study aimed to analyze the possible impact of RIPC in patients with vasospasm following aSAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled, and rater-masked trial at our high-volume neurovascular center. Patients treated for aSAH between November 2019 and September 2023 were randomly allocated to either the control or RIPC intervention group. The RIPC intervention involved three upper arm blood pressure cuff inflations (20 mm Hg above systolic pressure) for 5 min, followed by 5 min of reperfusion, administered for 10 consecutive days within the initial 14 days after aSAH. The primary end point was postinterventional computed tomography to identify new cerebral infarction areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 60 patients (29 in the intervention group, 31 in the control group) the entire cohort averaged 62.0 years, with no significant age difference between groups (p = 0.41). RIPC did not significantly affect the initial occurrence of symptomatic vasospasms or the incidence of cerebral infarctions (RIPC 24.1% vs. control 16.1%, p = 0.44). No significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to incidence of new neurological symptoms (p = > 0.99) or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote ischemic preconditioning does not appear to influence the occurrence of vasospasms or the development of new infarcts on computed tomography. Larger studies are needed to further explore whether RIPC may have a role in specific high-risk subgroups or clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Ischemic Preconditioning to Prevent Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Due to Vasospasm in the Treatment of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Carolin Albrecht, Teresa Silvestri, Maria Wostrack, Christian Maegerlein, Insa Janssen, Jan Martin, Bernhard Meyer, Arthur Wagner, Jens Gempt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02324-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has shown potential in reducing vasospasm-induced secondary ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Research suggests RIPC may help the brain adapt to periods of reduced blood flow, thereby reducing the risk of cerebral infarction secondary to delayed cerebral ischemia. This study aimed to analyze the possible impact of RIPC in patients with vasospasm following aSAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled, and rater-masked trial at our high-volume neurovascular center. Patients treated for aSAH between November 2019 and September 2023 were randomly allocated to either the control or RIPC intervention group. The RIPC intervention involved three upper arm blood pressure cuff inflations (20 mm Hg above systolic pressure) for 5 min, followed by 5 min of reperfusion, administered for 10 consecutive days within the initial 14 days after aSAH. The primary end point was postinterventional computed tomography to identify new cerebral infarction areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 60 patients (29 in the intervention group, 31 in the control group) the entire cohort averaged 62.0 years, with no significant age difference between groups (p = 0.41). RIPC did not significantly affect the initial occurrence of symptomatic vasospasms or the incidence of cerebral infarctions (RIPC 24.1% vs. control 16.1%, p = 0.44). No significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to incidence of new neurological symptoms (p = > 0.99) or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote ischemic preconditioning does not appear to influence the occurrence of vasospasms or the development of new infarcts on computed tomography. Larger studies are needed to further explore whether RIPC may have a role in specific high-risk subgroups or clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02324-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02324-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程缺血预处理(RIPC)已显示出减少动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后血管痉挛引起的继发性缺血的潜力。研究表明,RIPC可能有助于大脑适应血流量减少的时期,从而降低继发于延迟性脑缺血的脑梗死风险。本研究旨在分析RIPC对aSAH后血管痉挛患者的可能影响。方法:我们在我们的大容量神经血管中心进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照和非故意试验。2019年11月至2023年9月期间接受aSAH治疗的患者被随机分配到对照组或RIPC干预组。RIPC干预包括3次上臂血压袖带充气(高于收缩压20毫米汞柱),持续5分钟,然后再灌注5分钟,在aSAH后的最初14天内连续10天。主要终点是介入后计算机断层扫描,以确定新的脑梗死区域。结果:60例患者(干预组29例,对照组31例),整个队列平均年龄为62.0岁,组间年龄差异无统计学意义(p = 0.41)。RIPC对症状性血管痉挛的初始发生或脑梗死的发生率没有显著影响(RIPC组为24.1%,对照组为16.1%,p = 0.44)。两组在新发神经症状发生率(p = >.99)或住院死亡率(p = 0.5)方面无显著差异。结论:计算机断层扫描显示,远端缺血预处理似乎不会影响血管痉挛的发生或新梗死的发生。需要更大规模的研究来进一步探索RIPC是否可能在特定的高风险亚群或临床环境中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning to Prevent Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Due to Vasospasm in the Treatment of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has shown potential in reducing vasospasm-induced secondary ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Research suggests RIPC may help the brain adapt to periods of reduced blood flow, thereby reducing the risk of cerebral infarction secondary to delayed cerebral ischemia. This study aimed to analyze the possible impact of RIPC in patients with vasospasm following aSAH.

Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled, and rater-masked trial at our high-volume neurovascular center. Patients treated for aSAH between November 2019 and September 2023 were randomly allocated to either the control or RIPC intervention group. The RIPC intervention involved three upper arm blood pressure cuff inflations (20 mm Hg above systolic pressure) for 5 min, followed by 5 min of reperfusion, administered for 10 consecutive days within the initial 14 days after aSAH. The primary end point was postinterventional computed tomography to identify new cerebral infarction areas.

Results: Among 60 patients (29 in the intervention group, 31 in the control group) the entire cohort averaged 62.0 years, with no significant age difference between groups (p = 0.41). RIPC did not significantly affect the initial occurrence of symptomatic vasospasms or the incidence of cerebral infarctions (RIPC 24.1% vs. control 16.1%, p = 0.44). No significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to incidence of new neurological symptoms (p = > 0.99) or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.5).

Conclusions: Remote ischemic preconditioning does not appear to influence the occurrence of vasospasms or the development of new infarcts on computed tomography. Larger studies are needed to further explore whether RIPC may have a role in specific high-risk subgroups or clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信