Takuya Sato, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Ryota Inokuchi, Shotaro Aso, Hideo Yasunaga, Kent Doi
{"title":"甲泼尼龙与氢化可的松治疗重症肺炎的死亡率:倾向匹配分析","authors":"Takuya Sato, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Ryota Inokuchi, Shotaro Aso, Hideo Yasunaga, Kent Doi","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corticosteroids improve the outcomes of severe pneumonia; however, the most effective type remains unknown. In this study, we compared the mortality rates of patients with severe pneumonia who were treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with hydrocortisone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we utilized a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to include adult patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospitals between April 2017 and March 2022 and received either methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured confounders, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5,084 eligible patients, 623 matched pairs were analyzed. In-hospital mortality rates were 23.9% in the hydrocortisone group and 19.4% in the methylprednisolone group (risk difference [RD], 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.082 to 9.1; p = 0.054). Subgroup analysis of patients with shock demonstrated significantly higher mortality in the hydrocortisone group than in the methylprednisolone group (44.7% versus 30.1%; RD, 14.6%; 95% CI 1.4-27.8; p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients with severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone and those treated with hydrocortisone. Nevertheless, patients experiencing severe pneumonia-induced septic shock may derive benefits from methylprednisolone treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality of severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone versus hydrocortisone: a propensity-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Sato, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Ryota Inokuchi, Shotaro Aso, Hideo Yasunaga, Kent Doi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corticosteroids improve the outcomes of severe pneumonia; however, the most effective type remains unknown. In this study, we compared the mortality rates of patients with severe pneumonia who were treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with hydrocortisone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we utilized a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to include adult patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospitals between April 2017 and March 2022 and received either methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured confounders, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5,084 eligible patients, 623 matched pairs were analyzed. In-hospital mortality rates were 23.9% in the hydrocortisone group and 19.4% in the methylprednisolone group (risk difference [RD], 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.082 to 9.1; p = 0.054). Subgroup analysis of patients with shock demonstrated significantly higher mortality in the hydrocortisone group than in the methylprednisolone group (44.7% versus 30.1%; RD, 14.6%; 95% CI 1.4-27.8; p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients with severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone and those treated with hydrocortisone. Nevertheless, patients experiencing severe pneumonia-induced septic shock may derive benefits from methylprednisolone treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00810-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:皮质类固醇可改善重症肺炎的预后;然而,最有效的类型仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们比较了甲泼尼龙治疗与氢化可的松治疗的重症肺炎患者的死亡率。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们利用日本全国诊断程序联合住院患者数据库,纳入2017年4月至2022年3月期间住院并接受甲基强的松或氢化可的松治疗的成年重症肺炎患者。倾向评分匹配用于调整测量的混杂因素,以住院死亡率为主要结局。结果:在5084例符合条件的患者中,分析了623对配对。氢化可的松组住院死亡率为23.9%,甲基强的松龙组住院死亡率为19.4%(风险差异[RD], 4.5%;95%置信区间[CI] -0.082 ~ 9.1;p = 0.054)。休克患者的亚组分析显示,氢化可的松组的死亡率明显高于甲基强的松组(44.7% vs 30.1%;理查德·道金斯,14.6%;95% ci 1.4-27.8;p = 0.031)。结论:甲泼尼龙与氢化可的松治疗重症肺炎患者住院死亡率无显著差异。然而,经历严重肺炎引起的感染性休克的患者可能从甲基强的松龙治疗中获益。
Mortality of severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone versus hydrocortisone: a propensity-matched analysis.
Background: Corticosteroids improve the outcomes of severe pneumonia; however, the most effective type remains unknown. In this study, we compared the mortality rates of patients with severe pneumonia who were treated with methylprednisolone versus those treated with hydrocortisone.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we utilized a nationwide Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database to include adult patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to hospitals between April 2017 and March 2022 and received either methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for measured confounders, with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome.
Results: Among the 5,084 eligible patients, 623 matched pairs were analyzed. In-hospital mortality rates were 23.9% in the hydrocortisone group and 19.4% in the methylprednisolone group (risk difference [RD], 4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.082 to 9.1; p = 0.054). Subgroup analysis of patients with shock demonstrated significantly higher mortality in the hydrocortisone group than in the methylprednisolone group (44.7% versus 30.1%; RD, 14.6%; 95% CI 1.4-27.8; p = 0.031).
Conclusion: No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients with severe pneumonia treated with methylprednisolone and those treated with hydrocortisone. Nevertheless, patients experiencing severe pneumonia-induced septic shock may derive benefits from methylprednisolone treatment.
期刊介绍:
"Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction.
Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.