Lauren Loeb, Alexander Hochwald, Michael F Picco, Johanna L Chan, Jana G Hashash, Ryan Chadha, Francis A Farraye, Jami A Kinnucan
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者使用大麻与内窥镜持续时间延长和内窥镜炎症有关。","authors":"Lauren Loeb, Alexander Hochwald, Michael F Picco, Johanna L Chan, Jana G Hashash, Ryan Chadha, Francis A Farraye, Jami A Kinnucan","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective case-control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (<i>P</i> < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (<i>P</i> = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (<i>P</i> = .84), stricture (<i>P</i> = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (<i>P</i> = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .194).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"7 3","pages":"otaf034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis use in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease is Associated With Longer Endoscopic Duration and Endoscopic Inflammation.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Loeb, Alexander Hochwald, Michael F Picco, Johanna L Chan, Jana G Hashash, Ryan Chadha, Francis A Farraye, Jami A Kinnucan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otaf034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective case-control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (<i>P</i> < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (<i>P</i> = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (<i>P</i> = .84), stricture (<i>P</i> = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (<i>P</i> = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .194).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"otaf034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cannabis use in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease is Associated With Longer Endoscopic Duration and Endoscopic Inflammation.
Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation.
Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index.
Results: There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (P < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (P = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (P = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (P = .84), stricture (P = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (P = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (P = .194).
Conclusions: IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.