炎症性肠病患者使用大麻与内窥镜持续时间延长和内窥镜炎症有关。

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otaf034
Lauren Loeb, Alexander Hochwald, Michael F Picco, Johanna L Chan, Jana G Hashash, Ryan Chadha, Francis A Farraye, Jami A Kinnucan
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者使用大麻与内窥镜持续时间延长和内窥镜炎症有关。","authors":"Lauren Loeb, Alexander Hochwald, Michael F Picco, Johanna L Chan, Jana G Hashash, Ryan Chadha, Francis A Farraye, Jami A Kinnucan","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective case-control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (<i>P</i> < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (<i>P</i> = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (<i>P</i> = .84), stricture (<i>P</i> = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (<i>P</i> = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .194).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"7 3","pages":"otaf034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabis use in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease is Associated With Longer Endoscopic Duration and Endoscopic Inflammation.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Loeb, Alexander Hochwald, Michael F Picco, Johanna L Chan, Jana G Hashash, Ryan Chadha, Francis A Farraye, Jami A Kinnucan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otaf034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective case-control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (<i>P</i> < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (<i>P</i> = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (<i>P</i> = .84), stricture (<i>P</i> = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (<i>P</i> = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (<i>P</i> = .194).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"otaf034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otaf034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)患者通常会出现对现有治疗难以治愈的症状,这促使人们使用大麻等替代疗法。先前的研究表明,大麻使用者在手术过程中需要更高水平的镇静剂。对大麻的抗炎作用的研究得出了不同的结论。我们的目的是调查报告使用大麻的IBD患者是否需要更多的资源进行内窥镜手术,并且更有可能发生内窥镜炎症。方法:这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,研究对象是2018年11月至2022年11月在一家三级学术医疗中心接受内窥镜评估与IBD相关的急性主诉的成年IBD患者。病例根据年龄、性别和体重指数进行匹配。结果:124例IBD患者中62例报告使用大麻,62例未报告使用大麻。两组间内镜检查时间差异有统计学意义(P P = 0.044)。在恢复室停留时间(P = 0.15)、内镜检查期间IBD治疗(P = 0.84)、狭窄(P = 0.53)、调整手术时间后异丙酚剂量(P = 0.082)或有和没有内窥镜炎症的大麻使用者之间的内窥镜检查时间(P = 0.194)没有显著差异。结论:与非大麻使用者相比,IBD大麻使用者有更长的内镜持续时间,更有可能在内镜评估中表现出炎症。我们的研究强调了药物调节对更准确的资源分配的重要性。此外,联邦政府需要扩大大麻研究,进行随机对照试验,以满足目前对患者结果数据的未满足需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cannabis use in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease is Associated With Longer Endoscopic Duration and Endoscopic Inflammation.

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation.

Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index.

Results: There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (P < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (P = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (P = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (P = .84), stricture (P = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (P = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (P = .194).

Conclusions: IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信