骨折后逆行全肩关节置换术患者的肩关节形态。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jackson S Hamersly, Mason D Tippy, James E Slaven, Yohan Jang, Lauren M Ladd, Mark T Dillon
{"title":"骨折后逆行全肩关节置换术患者的肩关节形态。","authors":"Jackson S Hamersly, Mason D Tippy, James E Slaven, Yohan Jang, Lauren M Ladd, Mark T Dillon","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05977-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) due to arthritis has been previously studied; however, it has not been as thoroughly evaluated in fracture populations. The purpose of this study is to utilize pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans to better understand the glenoid anatomy of those patients undergoing rTSA due to fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients over the age of 18 who underwent rTSA for proximal humerus fractures from January 1, 2015 to October 31, 2023 at two university health system affiliated hospitals were included if they had a CT scan available for review and image reconstruction. Patients were excluded if a pathologic fracture was identified, surgery was performed greater than 6 weeks after the initial injury, surgery was a conversion or revision surgery, or if a glenoid fracture was present. Glenoid version and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) angles were measured by a musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist and a shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon and averaged for final values. Glenoid morphologies were determined using the Walch and Favard classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 70.4 years (range 36.6-91.2) were included in this study, 84.9% of which were female. Walch A1 glenoid morphology was noted in 92.5% of patients, and Favard E0 morphology was present in 98.1% of patients. Median glenoid version was 3° of retroversion. Median RSA angle was 19°. Of note, 37.7% of patients had a RSA angle of ≥ 20°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing rTSA for fracture may not have significant glenoid deformity from arthritic wear. However, surgeons should be aware of variations in glenoid version and RSA angle. In this study population, over one-third of patients had a RSA angle of ≥ 20°. Thus, surgeons should take these findings into account when performing rTSA for fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to fracture.\",\"authors\":\"Jackson S Hamersly, Mason D Tippy, James E Slaven, Yohan Jang, Lauren M Ladd, Mark T Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05977-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) due to arthritis has been previously studied; however, it has not been as thoroughly evaluated in fracture populations. The purpose of this study is to utilize pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans to better understand the glenoid anatomy of those patients undergoing rTSA due to fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients over the age of 18 who underwent rTSA for proximal humerus fractures from January 1, 2015 to October 31, 2023 at two university health system affiliated hospitals were included if they had a CT scan available for review and image reconstruction. Patients were excluded if a pathologic fracture was identified, surgery was performed greater than 6 weeks after the initial injury, surgery was a conversion or revision surgery, or if a glenoid fracture was present. Glenoid version and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) angles were measured by a musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist and a shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon and averaged for final values. Glenoid morphologies were determined using the Walch and Favard classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 70.4 years (range 36.6-91.2) were included in this study, 84.9% of which were female. Walch A1 glenoid morphology was noted in 92.5% of patients, and Favard E0 morphology was present in 98.1% of patients. Median glenoid version was 3° of retroversion. Median RSA angle was 19°. Of note, 37.7% of patients had a RSA angle of ≥ 20°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing rTSA for fracture may not have significant glenoid deformity from arthritic wear. However, surgeons should be aware of variations in glenoid version and RSA angle. In this study population, over one-third of patients had a RSA angle of ≥ 20°. Thus, surgeons should take these findings into account when performing rTSA for fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263477/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05977-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05977-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于关节炎而接受逆行全肩关节置换术(rTSA)的患者的肩关节形态已有研究;然而,在骨折人群中尚未进行全面的评估。本研究的目的是利用术前计算机断层扫描(CT)来更好地了解那些因骨折而接受rTSA的患者的肩关节解剖。材料和方法:2015年1月1日至2023年10月31日在两所大学卫生系统附属医院接受肱骨近端骨折rTSA治疗的18岁以上患者,如果他们有CT扫描可用于复查和图像重建,则纳入研究。排除病理性骨折、初次损伤后超过6周进行手术、手术是转换或翻修手术,或存在肩胛盂骨折的患者。关节盂正位和反向肩关节置换术(RSA)角度由肌肉骨骼协会培训的放射科医生和肩关节协会培训的矫形外科医生测量,并取最终值的平均值。使用Walch和Favard分类确定关节盂形态。结果:共纳入53例患者,平均年龄70.4岁(36.6 ~ 91.2岁),其中84.9%为女性。92.5%的患者有Walch A1型肩关节形态,98.1%的患者有Favard E0型肩关节形态。中位盂内翻为3°。中位RSA角度为19°。值得注意的是,37.7%的患者RSA角度≥20°。结论:接受rTSA治疗骨折的患者可能没有明显的关节磨损导致的关节盂畸形。然而,外科医生应该注意关节盂形状和RSA角度的变化。在本研究人群中,超过三分之一的患者RSA角度≥20°。因此,外科医生在对骨折进行rTSA手术时应考虑到这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to fracture.

Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to fracture.

Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to fracture.

Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to fracture.

Introduction: Glenoid morphology in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) due to arthritis has been previously studied; however, it has not been as thoroughly evaluated in fracture populations. The purpose of this study is to utilize pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans to better understand the glenoid anatomy of those patients undergoing rTSA due to fracture.

Materials and methods: Patients over the age of 18 who underwent rTSA for proximal humerus fractures from January 1, 2015 to October 31, 2023 at two university health system affiliated hospitals were included if they had a CT scan available for review and image reconstruction. Patients were excluded if a pathologic fracture was identified, surgery was performed greater than 6 weeks after the initial injury, surgery was a conversion or revision surgery, or if a glenoid fracture was present. Glenoid version and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) angles were measured by a musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist and a shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon and averaged for final values. Glenoid morphologies were determined using the Walch and Favard classifications.

Results: A total of 53 patients with a mean age of 70.4 years (range 36.6-91.2) were included in this study, 84.9% of which were female. Walch A1 glenoid morphology was noted in 92.5% of patients, and Favard E0 morphology was present in 98.1% of patients. Median glenoid version was 3° of retroversion. Median RSA angle was 19°. Of note, 37.7% of patients had a RSA angle of ≥ 20°.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing rTSA for fracture may not have significant glenoid deformity from arthritic wear. However, surgeons should be aware of variations in glenoid version and RSA angle. In this study population, over one-third of patients had a RSA angle of ≥ 20°. Thus, surgeons should take these findings into account when performing rTSA for fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信