重症监护病房的肾脏替代治疗:来自SRLF-GFRUP共识会议的指南

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mercè Jourdain, Ines Gragueb Chatti, Brahim Housni, Pierre Jaquet, Mélissa Jezequel, Oumar Kane, Béatrice La Combe, Mickael Landais, Mehdi Marzouk, Etienne de Montmollin, Guillaume Mortamet, Mai-Anh Nay, Charlotte Salmon-Gandonnière, Sophie Perinel-Ragey, Jérôme Rambaud, Joanna Schmitt, Marie Simon, Julie Starck, Arnaud W Thille, Pierre-François Dequin
{"title":"重症监护病房的肾脏替代治疗:来自SRLF-GFRUP共识会议的指南","authors":"Mercè Jourdain, Ines Gragueb Chatti, Brahim Housni, Pierre Jaquet, Mélissa Jezequel, Oumar Kane, Béatrice La Combe, Mickael Landais, Mehdi Marzouk, Etienne de Montmollin, Guillaume Mortamet, Mai-Anh Nay, Charlotte Salmon-Gandonnière, Sophie Perinel-Ragey, Jérôme Rambaud, Joanna Schmitt, Marie Simon, Julie Starck, Arnaud W Thille, Pierre-François Dequin","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01517-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although largely used, the place of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has yet to be clarified. The French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF) and the French Pediatric Group of Intensive Care and Emergency (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgence Pédiatrique, GFRUP) organized a consensus conference in November 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A committee, without any conflict of interest (CoI) on the subject, defined seven generic questions and drew up a list of sub questions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model. An independent work group reviewed literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Eighteen experts in the field from both societies proposed their own answers in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 14 critical-care medicine physicians and a nurse) and the public. The jury then met for 48 h to write out and vote on its recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel provided 45 statements addressing seven questions. In patients, adults or children, admitted to the ICU with AKI (1) What are the indications for RRT, when should it be initiated, and within what timeframe? (2) What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different RRT modalities in ICU, and based on what criteria should they be chosen? (3) Which dose of dialysis should be prescribed for ICU patients? (4) How to prescribe, adjust and monitor each RRT technique? (5) Which vascular access technique should be preferred (insertion site, catheter type and length)? (6) How to prevent circuit thrombosis? (7) What are the criteria to consider weaning from RRT and how can it be achieved?</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These recommendations should optimize the prescription and use of RRT during AKI in ICUs for both adult and pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal replacement therapy in an intensive care unit: guidelines from the SRLF-GFRUP consensus conference.\",\"authors\":\"Mercè Jourdain, Ines Gragueb Chatti, Brahim Housni, Pierre Jaquet, Mélissa Jezequel, Oumar Kane, Béatrice La Combe, Mickael Landais, Mehdi Marzouk, Etienne de Montmollin, Guillaume Mortamet, Mai-Anh Nay, Charlotte Salmon-Gandonnière, Sophie Perinel-Ragey, Jérôme Rambaud, Joanna Schmitt, Marie Simon, Julie Starck, Arnaud W Thille, Pierre-François Dequin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-025-01517-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although largely used, the place of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has yet to be clarified. The French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF) and the French Pediatric Group of Intensive Care and Emergency (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgence Pédiatrique, GFRUP) organized a consensus conference in November 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A committee, without any conflict of interest (CoI) on the subject, defined seven generic questions and drew up a list of sub questions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model. An independent work group reviewed literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Eighteen experts in the field from both societies proposed their own answers in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 14 critical-care medicine physicians and a nurse) and the public. The jury then met for 48 h to write out and vote on its recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel provided 45 statements addressing seven questions. In patients, adults or children, admitted to the ICU with AKI (1) What are the indications for RRT, when should it be initiated, and within what timeframe? (2) What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different RRT modalities in ICU, and based on what criteria should they be chosen? (3) Which dose of dialysis should be prescribed for ICU patients? (4) How to prescribe, adjust and monitor each RRT technique? (5) Which vascular access technique should be preferred (insertion site, catheter type and length)? (6) How to prevent circuit thrombosis? (7) What are the criteria to consider weaning from RRT and how can it be achieved?</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These recommendations should optimize the prescription and use of RRT during AKI in ICUs for both adult and pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01517-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01517-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管体外肾替代疗法(RRT)在重症监护病房(ICU)患者急性肾损伤(AKI)中的应用广泛,但其地位尚未明确。法国重症监护学会和法国重症监护和急诊儿科学会于2024年11月组织了一次共识会议。方法:一个没有任何利益冲突(CoI)的委员会根据人口、干预、比较和结果(PICO)模型确定了7个一般性问题,并编制了子问题清单。一个独立的工作小组使用预定义的关键词审查文献。使用GRADE方法评估数据的质量。来自两个协会的18位专家在公开会议上提出了他们自己的答案,并回答了陪审团(由14名重症医学医生和一名护士组成的小组)和公众的问题。陪审团随后开会48小时,对其建议进行撰写和投票。结果:专家组针对7个问题提供了45个陈述。对于因AKI入住ICU的成人或儿童患者(1)RRT的适应症是什么,何时开始,在什么时间范围内进行?(2) ICU中不同的RRT模式的优缺点是什么,应该根据什么标准来选择它们?(3) ICU患者应开哪种剂量的透析?(4)各RRT技术如何处方、调整和监控?(5)首选哪种血管通路技术(插入部位、导管类型、长度)?(6)如何预防电路血栓形成?(7)考虑停止RRT的标准是什么?如何实现?结论:这些建议应优化成人和儿童icu患者AKI期间RRT的处方和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renal replacement therapy in an intensive care unit: guidelines from the SRLF-GFRUP consensus conference.

Background: Although largely used, the place of extracorporeal renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients has yet to be clarified. The French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française, SRLF) and the French Pediatric Group of Intensive Care and Emergency (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgence Pédiatrique, GFRUP) organized a consensus conference in November 2024.

Methods: A committee, without any conflict of interest (CoI) on the subject, defined seven generic questions and drew up a list of sub questions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model. An independent work group reviewed literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Eighteen experts in the field from both societies proposed their own answers in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 14 critical-care medicine physicians and a nurse) and the public. The jury then met for 48 h to write out and vote on its recommendations.

Results: The panel provided 45 statements addressing seven questions. In patients, adults or children, admitted to the ICU with AKI (1) What are the indications for RRT, when should it be initiated, and within what timeframe? (2) What are the advantages/disadvantages of the different RRT modalities in ICU, and based on what criteria should they be chosen? (3) Which dose of dialysis should be prescribed for ICU patients? (4) How to prescribe, adjust and monitor each RRT technique? (5) Which vascular access technique should be preferred (insertion site, catheter type and length)? (6) How to prevent circuit thrombosis? (7) What are the criteria to consider weaning from RRT and how can it be achieved?

Conclusions: These recommendations should optimize the prescription and use of RRT during AKI in ICUs for both adult and pediatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信