Arthur A R Sweet, Sophie L van Wolfswinkel, Tim Kobes, Kim E M Benders, Roderick M Houwert, Luke P H Leenen, Pim A de Jong, Wouter B Veldhuis, Falco Hietbrink, Mark C P M van Baal
{"title":"胸片对急性创伤护理患者管理的影响——来自一级创伤中心的观察。","authors":"Arthur A R Sweet, Sophie L van Wolfswinkel, Tim Kobes, Kim E M Benders, Roderick M Houwert, Luke P H Leenen, Pim A de Jong, Wouter B Veldhuis, Falco Hietbrink, Mark C P M van Baal","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02929-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of chest radiography on acute interventions in the trauma bay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed on trauma patients admitted to the University Medical Center Utrecht, a level-1 trauma center, during a one-year period. All adult (≥ 16 years) trauma patients who underwent chest radiography in the trauma bay and were subsequently admitted to the hospital were eligible. Patients with non-blunt trauma, initial primary survey in another center, or initial chest radiography obtained outside the shock room were excluded. Patients were categorized as hemodynamically and respiratory compromised or non-compromised patients, and based on symptoms of chest injuries. Descriptive analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 780 patients, with a median age of 51 years (IQR 32-68), and 66.2% were male. Comorbidities (ASA 3-4) were seen in 12.8% and the median ISS was 10 (IQR 5-18). There were 382 hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised patients without symptoms of chest injuries, of whom 255 underwent a subsequent chest CT. No acute interventions were performed in these patients. In symptomatic but hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised patients (n = 289) there were 15 (5.2%) non-urgent chest tube placements prior to CT. Among 109 hemodynamically or respiratory compromised patients there were 16 (14.7%) chest tube placements and five (4.6%) resuscitation surgeries prior to the chest CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Omission of chest radiography in hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised trauma patients presenting in the trauma bay seems safe, provided that a chest CT is already indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":520620,"journal":{"name":"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society","volume":"51 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of chest radiography on patient management in acute trauma care- observation from a level-1 trauma center.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur A R Sweet, Sophie L van Wolfswinkel, Tim Kobes, Kim E M Benders, Roderick M Houwert, Luke P H Leenen, Pim A de Jong, Wouter B Veldhuis, Falco Hietbrink, Mark C P M van Baal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-025-02929-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of chest radiography on acute interventions in the trauma bay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed on trauma patients admitted to the University Medical Center Utrecht, a level-1 trauma center, during a one-year period. All adult (≥ 16 years) trauma patients who underwent chest radiography in the trauma bay and were subsequently admitted to the hospital were eligible. Patients with non-blunt trauma, initial primary survey in another center, or initial chest radiography obtained outside the shock room were excluded. Patients were categorized as hemodynamically and respiratory compromised or non-compromised patients, and based on symptoms of chest injuries. Descriptive analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 780 patients, with a median age of 51 years (IQR 32-68), and 66.2% were male. Comorbidities (ASA 3-4) were seen in 12.8% and the median ISS was 10 (IQR 5-18). There were 382 hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised patients without symptoms of chest injuries, of whom 255 underwent a subsequent chest CT. No acute interventions were performed in these patients. In symptomatic but hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised patients (n = 289) there were 15 (5.2%) non-urgent chest tube placements prior to CT. Among 109 hemodynamically or respiratory compromised patients there were 16 (14.7%) chest tube placements and five (4.6%) resuscitation surgeries prior to the chest CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Omission of chest radiography in hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised trauma patients presenting in the trauma bay seems safe, provided that a chest CT is already indicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12259803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02929-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02929-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of chest radiography on patient management in acute trauma care- observation from a level-1 trauma center.
Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of chest radiography on acute interventions in the trauma bay.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on trauma patients admitted to the University Medical Center Utrecht, a level-1 trauma center, during a one-year period. All adult (≥ 16 years) trauma patients who underwent chest radiography in the trauma bay and were subsequently admitted to the hospital were eligible. Patients with non-blunt trauma, initial primary survey in another center, or initial chest radiography obtained outside the shock room were excluded. Patients were categorized as hemodynamically and respiratory compromised or non-compromised patients, and based on symptoms of chest injuries. Descriptive analyses were used.
Results: This study included 780 patients, with a median age of 51 years (IQR 32-68), and 66.2% were male. Comorbidities (ASA 3-4) were seen in 12.8% and the median ISS was 10 (IQR 5-18). There were 382 hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised patients without symptoms of chest injuries, of whom 255 underwent a subsequent chest CT. No acute interventions were performed in these patients. In symptomatic but hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised patients (n = 289) there were 15 (5.2%) non-urgent chest tube placements prior to CT. Among 109 hemodynamically or respiratory compromised patients there were 16 (14.7%) chest tube placements and five (4.6%) resuscitation surgeries prior to the chest CT.
Conclusion: Omission of chest radiography in hemodynamically and respiratory non-compromised trauma patients presenting in the trauma bay seems safe, provided that a chest CT is already indicated.