中国医疗改革中的医师分组执业:一项关于医师观点和实施挑战的全国性调查。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1574388
Rui Fan, Qing Meng, Long Zhang, Chao Liu, Li Han, Meng Liu, Leiyu Shi
{"title":"中国医疗改革中的医师分组执业:一项关于医师观点和实施挑战的全国性调查。","authors":"Rui Fan, Qing Meng, Long Zhang, Chao Liu, Li Han, Meng Liu, Leiyu Shi","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1574388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The physician group (PG) model, while well-established in the United States, is a relatively recent healthcare delivery innovation in China. Despite rapid growth in PG registrations, comprehensive understanding of physicians' perspectives remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate Chinese physicians' perspectives and concerns regarding the PG model and identify factors influencing their support for its implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 535 Chinese physicians between October-November 2024. The survey assessed participants' views on PG advantages, concerns, and overall support. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and variance analyses to explore correlations between physicians' characteristics and their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key facilitators for PG development included \"New career direction outside the existing system\" (75.1%) and \"Improved income levels\" (74.4%). Major concerns comprised \"Policies restricting physician mobility\" (69.7%) and \"Lack of support from hospital managers\" (57.8%). Overall support for PGs was moderate (3.710 ± 1.241). Administrative position holders showed significantly higher support than non-administrative staff (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and longer work experience correlated positively with support (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Hospital level and specialty area showed no significant influence on support levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first systematic study of Chinese physicians' perspectives on PGs reveals moderate support driven by career development and income opportunities, while highlighting regulatory and institutional barriers. Results suggest the need for stable policies, enhanced income frameworks, and targeted support for early career physicians-who currently show less support than experienced physicians-to facilitate successful PG implementation in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1574388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician group practice in China's healthcare reform: a national survey on physicians' perspectives and implementation challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Fan, Qing Meng, Long Zhang, Chao Liu, Li Han, Meng Liu, Leiyu Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2025.1574388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The physician group (PG) model, while well-established in the United States, is a relatively recent healthcare delivery innovation in China. Despite rapid growth in PG registrations, comprehensive understanding of physicians' perspectives remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate Chinese physicians' perspectives and concerns regarding the PG model and identify factors influencing their support for its implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 535 Chinese physicians between October-November 2024. The survey assessed participants' views on PG advantages, concerns, and overall support. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and variance analyses to explore correlations between physicians' characteristics and their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key facilitators for PG development included \\\"New career direction outside the existing system\\\" (75.1%) and \\\"Improved income levels\\\" (74.4%). Major concerns comprised \\\"Policies restricting physician mobility\\\" (69.7%) and \\\"Lack of support from hospital managers\\\" (57.8%). Overall support for PGs was moderate (3.710 ± 1.241). Administrative position holders showed significantly higher support than non-administrative staff (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and longer work experience correlated positively with support (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Hospital level and specialty area showed no significant influence on support levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This first systematic study of Chinese physicians' perspectives on PGs reveals moderate support driven by career development and income opportunities, while highlighting regulatory and institutional barriers. Results suggest the need for stable policies, enhanced income frameworks, and targeted support for early career physicians-who currently show less support than experienced physicians-to facilitate successful PG implementation in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1574388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1574388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1574388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医生组(PG)模式虽然在美国已经建立,但在中国是一个相对较新的医疗服务创新。尽管PG注册人数快速增长,但对医生观点的全面理解仍然有限。目的:了解中国医师对PG模式的看法和关注,并确定影响其实施支持的因素。方法:于2024年10 - 11月对535名中国医生进行横断面在线调查。该调查评估了参与者对PG优势、关注点和总体支持度的看法。数据分析包括描述性统计和方差分析,以探讨医生特征与他们的观点之间的相关性。结果:促进PG发展的主要因素包括“现有系统外的新职业方向”(75.1%)和“提高收入水平”(74.4%)。主要关注的问题包括“限制医生流动的政策”(69.7%)及“缺乏医院管理人员的支持”(57.8%)。对pg的总体支持度为中等(3.710±1.241)。行政职位人员的支持度显著高于非行政职位人员(p = 0.004),工作经验与支持度正相关(p = 0.037)。医院级别和专科领域对支持水平无显著影响。结论:本研究首次系统研究了中国医生对pg的看法,发现职业发展和收入机会驱动了对pg的适度支持,同时突出了监管和制度障碍。研究结果表明,需要制定稳定的政策,加强收入框架,并有针对性地支持早期职业医生,以促进PG在中国的成功实施。目前,早期职业医生获得的支持少于经验丰富的医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician group practice in China's healthcare reform: a national survey on physicians' perspectives and implementation challenges.

Background: The physician group (PG) model, while well-established in the United States, is a relatively recent healthcare delivery innovation in China. Despite rapid growth in PG registrations, comprehensive understanding of physicians' perspectives remains limited.

Objective: To investigate Chinese physicians' perspectives and concerns regarding the PG model and identify factors influencing their support for its implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 535 Chinese physicians between October-November 2024. The survey assessed participants' views on PG advantages, concerns, and overall support. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and variance analyses to explore correlations between physicians' characteristics and their perspectives.

Results: Key facilitators for PG development included "New career direction outside the existing system" (75.1%) and "Improved income levels" (74.4%). Major concerns comprised "Policies restricting physician mobility" (69.7%) and "Lack of support from hospital managers" (57.8%). Overall support for PGs was moderate (3.710 ± 1.241). Administrative position holders showed significantly higher support than non-administrative staff (p = 0.004), and longer work experience correlated positively with support (p = 0.037). Hospital level and specialty area showed no significant influence on support levels.

Conclusion: This first systematic study of Chinese physicians' perspectives on PGs reveals moderate support driven by career development and income opportunities, while highlighting regulatory and institutional barriers. Results suggest the need for stable policies, enhanced income frameworks, and targeted support for early career physicians-who currently show less support than experienced physicians-to facilitate successful PG implementation in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信