三种意大利肉牛品种平均日增重的多品种基因组预测。

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Daniele Colombi, Renzo Bonifazi, Fiorella Sbarra, Andrea Quaglia, Mario P L Calus, Emiliano Lasagna
{"title":"三种意大利肉牛品种平均日增重的多品种基因组预测。","authors":"Daniele Colombi, Renzo Bonifazi, Fiorella Sbarra, Andrea Quaglia, Mario P L Calus, Emiliano Lasagna","doi":"10.1111/jbg.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Marchigiana, Chianina, and Romagnola are three Italian autochthonous beef cattle breeds that have been historically selected for meat production. Recent advancements suggest that the use of genomic data and multi-breed (MB) models to combine information from different breeds may help to increase the accuracies of genomic predictions, in particular if the available data per breed is limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracies of genomic predictions for average daily gain (ADG) in the three Italian breeds. We implemented different scenarios using phenotypes collected on 5303 young bulls in performance tests across the three breeds, 23,793 pedigree records, and 4593 genotypes, and then validated through the linear regression method. The implemented scenarios were: pedigree Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (pBLUP) and single-step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) single-trait single-breed evaluations where each breed was modelled separately; pBLUP and ssGBLUP single-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was modelled as the same trait for all breeds, and ssGBLUP multi-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was considered as a different correlated trait across breeds. In addition, single- and multi-breed pBLUP and ssGBLUP evaluations were implemented including weight at 1 year of age and muscularity as correlated traits of ADG in a multi-trait approach. Results highlighted the improved accuracies (an average of 5% in ssGBLUP models compared to corresponding pBLUP ones) when incorporating genomic data in the prediction models. Moreover, single-trait multi-breed scenarios resulted in higher accuracy for breeds with lower heritabilities for ADG (an average of 4% for single-trait multi-breed models compared to single-breed ones), confirming the importance of leveraging data from populations with higher heritabilities. Lastly, adding two correlated traits next to ADG in the single- and multi-breed ssGBLUP yielded even higher accuracies than the scenarios only encompassing ADG. The observed increases in accuracy when leveraging data from more populations and/or more traits could be helpful when implementing genomic predictions for innovative traits with limited records per individual or low heritabilities, and for the genetic improvement of local populations where limited data availability represents a challenge for traditional genetic selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Average Daily Gain in Three Italian Beef Cattle Breeds.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Colombi, Renzo Bonifazi, Fiorella Sbarra, Andrea Quaglia, Mario P L Calus, Emiliano Lasagna\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbg.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Marchigiana, Chianina, and Romagnola are three Italian autochthonous beef cattle breeds that have been historically selected for meat production. Recent advancements suggest that the use of genomic data and multi-breed (MB) models to combine information from different breeds may help to increase the accuracies of genomic predictions, in particular if the available data per breed is limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracies of genomic predictions for average daily gain (ADG) in the three Italian breeds. We implemented different scenarios using phenotypes collected on 5303 young bulls in performance tests across the three breeds, 23,793 pedigree records, and 4593 genotypes, and then validated through the linear regression method. The implemented scenarios were: pedigree Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (pBLUP) and single-step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) single-trait single-breed evaluations where each breed was modelled separately; pBLUP and ssGBLUP single-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was modelled as the same trait for all breeds, and ssGBLUP multi-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was considered as a different correlated trait across breeds. In addition, single- and multi-breed pBLUP and ssGBLUP evaluations were implemented including weight at 1 year of age and muscularity as correlated traits of ADG in a multi-trait approach. Results highlighted the improved accuracies (an average of 5% in ssGBLUP models compared to corresponding pBLUP ones) when incorporating genomic data in the prediction models. Moreover, single-trait multi-breed scenarios resulted in higher accuracy for breeds with lower heritabilities for ADG (an average of 4% for single-trait multi-breed models compared to single-breed ones), confirming the importance of leveraging data from populations with higher heritabilities. Lastly, adding two correlated traits next to ADG in the single- and multi-breed ssGBLUP yielded even higher accuracies than the scenarios only encompassing ADG. The observed increases in accuracy when leveraging data from more populations and/or more traits could be helpful when implementing genomic predictions for innovative traits with limited records per individual or low heritabilities, and for the genetic improvement of local populations where limited data availability represents a challenge for traditional genetic selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.70004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Marchigiana, Chianina和Romagnola是三种意大利本土肉牛品种,历史上一直被选择用于肉类生产。最近的进展表明,使用基因组数据和多品种(MB)模型来组合来自不同品种的信息可能有助于提高基因组预测的准确性,特别是在每个品种的可用数据有限的情况下。本研究旨在评估和比较三个意大利品种平均日增重(ADG)基因组预测的准确性。利用在三个品种、23,793个家系记录和4593个基因型中收集的5303头公牛的性能测试表型,实现了不同的场景,然后通过线性回归方法进行验证。实施的方案是:系谱最佳线性无偏预测(pBLUP)和单步基因组BLUP (ssGBLUP)单性状单品种评估,其中每个品种单独建模;在pBLUP和ssGBLUP单性状多品种评价中,平均日增重被建模为所有品种的相同性状;在ssGBLUP多性状多品种评价中,平均日增重被认为是不同品种的不同相关性状。此外,采用多性状法对单品种和多品种的pBLUP和ssGBLUP进行评价,包括1岁体重和肌肉量作为平均日增重的相关性状。结果强调了当将基因组数据纳入预测模型时,准确性得到了提高(与相应的pBLUP模型相比,ssGBLUP模型的平均准确率为5%)。此外,单性状多品种模型对遗传力较低的品种的平均平均日增重精度更高(与单品种模型相比,单性状多品种模型的平均平均精度为4%),证实了利用遗传力较高的群体数据的重要性。最后,在单品种和多品种的ssGBLUP中,在ADG旁边添加两个相关性状比只包含ADG的情景产生更高的准确性。当利用来自更多种群和/或更多性状的数据时,所观察到的准确性的提高可能有助于对个体记录有限或遗传力低的创新性状进行基因组预测,以及对数据有限的地方种群的遗传改良,这对传统的遗传选择构成了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Average Daily Gain in Three Italian Beef Cattle Breeds.

Marchigiana, Chianina, and Romagnola are three Italian autochthonous beef cattle breeds that have been historically selected for meat production. Recent advancements suggest that the use of genomic data and multi-breed (MB) models to combine information from different breeds may help to increase the accuracies of genomic predictions, in particular if the available data per breed is limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracies of genomic predictions for average daily gain (ADG) in the three Italian breeds. We implemented different scenarios using phenotypes collected on 5303 young bulls in performance tests across the three breeds, 23,793 pedigree records, and 4593 genotypes, and then validated through the linear regression method. The implemented scenarios were: pedigree Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (pBLUP) and single-step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) single-trait single-breed evaluations where each breed was modelled separately; pBLUP and ssGBLUP single-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was modelled as the same trait for all breeds, and ssGBLUP multi-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was considered as a different correlated trait across breeds. In addition, single- and multi-breed pBLUP and ssGBLUP evaluations were implemented including weight at 1 year of age and muscularity as correlated traits of ADG in a multi-trait approach. Results highlighted the improved accuracies (an average of 5% in ssGBLUP models compared to corresponding pBLUP ones) when incorporating genomic data in the prediction models. Moreover, single-trait multi-breed scenarios resulted in higher accuracy for breeds with lower heritabilities for ADG (an average of 4% for single-trait multi-breed models compared to single-breed ones), confirming the importance of leveraging data from populations with higher heritabilities. Lastly, adding two correlated traits next to ADG in the single- and multi-breed ssGBLUP yielded even higher accuracies than the scenarios only encompassing ADG. The observed increases in accuracy when leveraging data from more populations and/or more traits could be helpful when implementing genomic predictions for innovative traits with limited records per individual or low heritabilities, and for the genetic improvement of local populations where limited data availability represents a challenge for traditional genetic selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信