下四分之一y -平衡测验的测验性质:言语指示和焦点技巧的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Busra Pakoz, Derya Durguncu, Irem Duzgun, Elif Turgut
{"title":"下四分之一y -平衡测验的测验性质:言语指示和焦点技巧的影响。","authors":"Busra Pakoz, Derya Durguncu, Irem Duzgun, Elif Turgut","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Studies have yet to demonstrate how attentional focus strategies affect dynamic balance in the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and its testing properties. This study aimed to examine the effects of verbal instructions and focus techniques on dynamic balance performance during the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and to assess the reliability of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 52 healthy individuals (mean age: 23.1 y, mean body mass index: 22.3 kg/m2). Standard, internal focus, and external focus instructions were randomly applied during Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test. Test-retest evaluations conducted within 3 to 5 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference only in the anterior direction among instructions (F2,102 = 6.851, P = .002). External focus instruction in the anterior direction produced slightly higher results than both standard (mean difference% = 2.91, P = .005) and internal focus instruction (mean difference% = 2.91, P = .005), though this change was relatively small. Intraclass correlation coefficient values indicated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: .87-.93) for all directions with internal and external focus instructions, except for the posteromedial direction and composite score with standard instructions (intraclass correlation coefficient: .70-.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings imply that including external focus instructions in dynamic balance evaluations can positively impact performance results as well as the reliability of the assessments. This enhancement in reliability may facilitate better-informed decisions in clinical and athletic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test Properties of the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test: Effect of Verbal Instructions and Focus Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Busra Pakoz, Derya Durguncu, Irem Duzgun, Elif Turgut\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Studies have yet to demonstrate how attentional focus strategies affect dynamic balance in the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and its testing properties. This study aimed to examine the effects of verbal instructions and focus techniques on dynamic balance performance during the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and to assess the reliability of these techniques.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 52 healthy individuals (mean age: 23.1 y, mean body mass index: 22.3 kg/m2). Standard, internal focus, and external focus instructions were randomly applied during Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test. Test-retest evaluations conducted within 3 to 5 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference only in the anterior direction among instructions (F2,102 = 6.851, P = .002). External focus instruction in the anterior direction produced slightly higher results than both standard (mean difference% = 2.91, P = .005) and internal focus instruction (mean difference% = 2.91, P = .005), though this change was relatively small. Intraclass correlation coefficient values indicated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: .87-.93) for all directions with internal and external focus instructions, except for the posteromedial direction and composite score with standard instructions (intraclass correlation coefficient: .70-.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings imply that including external focus instructions in dynamic balance evaluations can positively impact performance results as well as the reliability of the assessments. This enhancement in reliability may facilitate better-informed decisions in clinical and athletic settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究尚未证明注意焦点策略如何影响下季度y平衡测试中的动态平衡及其测试特性。本研究旨在考察言语指导和焦点技术对低年级y -平衡测试中动态平衡表现的影响,并评估这些技术的可靠性。设计:横断面研究。方法:52例健康个体(平均年龄23.1岁,平均体重指数22.3 kg/m2)。在下季度y平衡测试中,随机应用标准、内部焦点和外部焦点指令。3 - 5天内进行复试评估。结果:方差分析显示各指令间仅在前方向有显著性差异(f2102 = 6.851, P = 0.002)。前向外聚焦指导的效果略高于标准(平均差值% = 2.91,P = 0.005)和内聚焦指导(平均差值% = 2.91,P = 0.005),但这种变化相对较小。类内相关系数值显示,除后内侧方向和标准指令的综合评分外,内外聚焦指令的所有方向均具有极好的信度(类内相关系数为0.87 ~ 0.93)。结论:研究结果表明,在动态平衡评价中加入外部焦点指示对绩效结果和评价的信度有积极的影响。这种可靠性的提高可能有助于在临床和运动环境中做出更明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Test Properties of the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test: Effect of Verbal Instructions and Focus Techniques.

Context: Studies have yet to demonstrate how attentional focus strategies affect dynamic balance in the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and its testing properties. This study aimed to examine the effects of verbal instructions and focus techniques on dynamic balance performance during the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and to assess the reliability of these techniques.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: The study involved 52 healthy individuals (mean age: 23.1 y, mean body mass index: 22.3 kg/m2). Standard, internal focus, and external focus instructions were randomly applied during Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test. Test-retest evaluations conducted within 3 to 5 days.

Results: Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference only in the anterior direction among instructions (F2,102 = 6.851, P = .002). External focus instruction in the anterior direction produced slightly higher results than both standard (mean difference% = 2.91, P = .005) and internal focus instruction (mean difference% = 2.91, P = .005), though this change was relatively small. Intraclass correlation coefficient values indicated excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: .87-.93) for all directions with internal and external focus instructions, except for the posteromedial direction and composite score with standard instructions (intraclass correlation coefficient: .70-.77).

Conclusions: The findings imply that including external focus instructions in dynamic balance evaluations can positively impact performance results as well as the reliability of the assessments. This enhancement in reliability may facilitate better-informed decisions in clinical and athletic settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信