心血管疾病一级预防的最佳风险评估调度。

IF 1.6 3区 数学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
Francesca Gasperoni, Christopher H Jackson, Angela M Wood, Michael J Sweeting, Paul J Newcombe, David Stevens, Jessica K Barrett
{"title":"心血管疾病一级预防的最佳风险评估调度。","authors":"Francesca Gasperoni, Christopher H Jackson, Angela M Wood, Michael J Sweeting, Paul J Newcombe, David Stevens, Jessica K Barrett","doi":"10.1093/jrsssa/qnae086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this work, we introduce a personalized and age-specific net benefit function, composed of benefits and costs, to recommend optimal timing of risk assessments for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. We extend the 2-stage landmarking model to estimate patient-specific CVD risk profiles, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We apply our model to data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, comprising primary care electronic health records from the UK. We find that people at lower risk could be recommended an optimal risk-assessment interval of 5 years or more. Time-varying risk factors are required to discriminate between more frequent schedules for high-risk people.</p>","PeriodicalId":49983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society","volume":"188 3","pages":"920-934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256122/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Gasperoni, Christopher H Jackson, Angela M Wood, Michael J Sweeting, Paul J Newcombe, David Stevens, Jessica K Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrsssa/qnae086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this work, we introduce a personalized and age-specific net benefit function, composed of benefits and costs, to recommend optimal timing of risk assessments for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. We extend the 2-stage landmarking model to estimate patient-specific CVD risk profiles, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We apply our model to data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, comprising primary care electronic health records from the UK. We find that people at lower risk could be recommended an optimal risk-assessment interval of 5 years or more. Time-varying risk factors are required to discriminate between more frequent schedules for high-risk people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society\",\"volume\":\"188 3\",\"pages\":\"920-934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnae086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A-Statistics in Society","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnae086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们引入了一个个性化和特定年龄的净收益函数,由收益和成本组成,以推荐心血管疾病(CVD)预防风险评估的最佳时机。我们扩展了两阶段里程碑模型,以估计患者特定的心血管疾病风险概况,调整时变协变量。我们将我们的模型应用于临床实践研究数据链的数据,包括来自英国的初级保健电子健康记录。我们发现风险较低的人可以推荐5年或更长时间的最佳风险评估间隔。需要有时变的风险因素来区分高风险人群更频繁的日程安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

In this work, we introduce a personalized and age-specific net benefit function, composed of benefits and costs, to recommend optimal timing of risk assessments for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. We extend the 2-stage landmarking model to estimate patient-specific CVD risk profiles, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We apply our model to data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, comprising primary care electronic health records from the UK. We find that people at lower risk could be recommended an optimal risk-assessment interval of 5 years or more. Time-varying risk factors are required to discriminate between more frequent schedules for high-risk people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Series A (Statistics in Society) publishes high quality papers that demonstrate how statistical thinking, design and analyses play a vital role in all walks of life and benefit society in general. There is no restriction on subject-matter: any interesting, topical and revelatory applications of statistics are welcome. For example, important applications of statistical and related data science methodology in medicine, business and commerce, industry, economics and finance, education and teaching, physical and biomedical sciences, the environment, the law, government and politics, demography, psychology, sociology and sport all fall within the journal''s remit. The journal is therefore aimed at a wide statistical audience and at professional statisticians in particular. Its emphasis is on well-written and clearly reasoned quantitative approaches to problems in the real world rather than the exposition of technical detail. Thus, although the methodological basis of papers must be sound and adequately explained, methodology per se should not be the main focus of a Series A paper. Of particular interest are papers on topical or contentious statistical issues, papers which give reviews or exposés of current statistical concerns and papers which demonstrate how appropriate statistical thinking has contributed to our understanding of important substantive questions. Historical, professional and biographical contributions are also welcome, as are discussions of methods of data collection and of ethical issues, provided that all such papers have substantial statistical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信