近交对平衡选择的影响:来自Fisher几何模型的见解。

IF 5.1 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Genetics Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1093/genetics/iyaf128
Colin Olito, Tim Connallon
{"title":"近交对平衡选择的影响:来自Fisher几何模型的见解。","authors":"Colin Olito, Tim Connallon","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyaf128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Balancing selection is a potentially important factor in the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness and, alongside recessive deleterious mutations, the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Classic population genetics theory predicts that inbreeding restricts the range of conditions leading to balancing selection. For example, in models of heterozygote advantage, the classic theory shows that inbreeding reduces the parameter conditions for balancing selection by a factor of 1-F, where F is Wright's inbreeding coefficient. However, without a model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations or genotypes, this classic theory tells us little about the actual probability that new or segregating mutations meet criteria for balancing selection. Here, we develop an extension of Fisher's geometric model with which we explore how inbreeding affects the probability of balancing selection due to heterozygote advantage and its contribution to genetic variance for fitness. When taking the distribution of fitness effects among new, adaptive, and established mutations into account, we find that the prevalence of balancing selection is consistently, and often substantially, below the 1-F baseline implied by classic theory provided that most mutations have phenotypic effects that are small. The reduction is consistently greater for established mutations relative to adaptive mutations, which reinforces the idea that balanced genetic polymorphisms are far more likely to occur in outbred than inbred species. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of genetic variation for fitness and genome scans for signals of balancing selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of inbreeding on balancing selection: insights from Fisher's geometric model.\",\"authors\":\"Colin Olito, Tim Connallon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/genetics/iyaf128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Balancing selection is a potentially important factor in the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness and, alongside recessive deleterious mutations, the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Classic population genetics theory predicts that inbreeding restricts the range of conditions leading to balancing selection. For example, in models of heterozygote advantage, the classic theory shows that inbreeding reduces the parameter conditions for balancing selection by a factor of 1-F, where F is Wright's inbreeding coefficient. However, without a model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations or genotypes, this classic theory tells us little about the actual probability that new or segregating mutations meet criteria for balancing selection. Here, we develop an extension of Fisher's geometric model with which we explore how inbreeding affects the probability of balancing selection due to heterozygote advantage and its contribution to genetic variance for fitness. When taking the distribution of fitness effects among new, adaptive, and established mutations into account, we find that the prevalence of balancing selection is consistently, and often substantially, below the 1-F baseline implied by classic theory provided that most mutations have phenotypic effects that are small. The reduction is consistently greater for established mutations relative to adaptive mutations, which reinforces the idea that balanced genetic polymorphisms are far more likely to occur in outbred than inbred species. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of genetic variation for fitness and genome scans for signals of balancing selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406006/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平衡选择是维持适合度遗传变异的潜在重要因素,与隐性有害突变一起,是近交抑制的遗传基础。经典的群体遗传学理论预测,近亲繁殖限制了导致平衡选择的条件范围。例如,在杂合子优势模型中,经典理论表明,近交使平衡选择的参数条件降低了1 - F,其中F为Wright近交系数。然而,由于没有突变或基因型适应度效应分布的模型,这一经典理论几乎没有告诉我们新突变或分离突变满足平衡选择标准的实际概率。本文对Fisher几何模型进行了扩展,探讨了近交如何影响杂合子优势导致的平衡选择概率及其对适合度遗传方差的贡献。当考虑到新突变、适应性突变和已建立突变之间的适应度效应分布时,我们发现,在大多数突变具有较小的表型效应的情况下,平衡选择的流行率始终低于经典理论所隐含的1 - F基线。相对于适应性突变而言,既定突变的减少幅度一直更大,这加强了一种观点,即平衡的基因多态性更有可能发生在近亲繁殖的物种中,而不是近亲繁殖的物种。我们讨论了我们的结果对适应性遗传变异和平衡选择信号的基因组扫描研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of inbreeding on balancing selection: insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Balancing selection is a potentially important factor in the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness and, alongside recessive deleterious mutations, the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Classic population genetics theory predicts that inbreeding restricts the range of conditions leading to balancing selection. For example, in models of heterozygote advantage, the classic theory shows that inbreeding reduces the parameter conditions for balancing selection by a factor of 1-F, where F is Wright's inbreeding coefficient. However, without a model for the distribution of fitness effects of mutations or genotypes, this classic theory tells us little about the actual probability that new or segregating mutations meet criteria for balancing selection. Here, we develop an extension of Fisher's geometric model with which we explore how inbreeding affects the probability of balancing selection due to heterozygote advantage and its contribution to genetic variance for fitness. When taking the distribution of fitness effects among new, adaptive, and established mutations into account, we find that the prevalence of balancing selection is consistently, and often substantially, below the 1-F baseline implied by classic theory provided that most mutations have phenotypic effects that are small. The reduction is consistently greater for established mutations relative to adaptive mutations, which reinforces the idea that balanced genetic polymorphisms are far more likely to occur in outbred than inbred species. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of genetic variation for fitness and genome scans for signals of balancing selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics
Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work. While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal. The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists. GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信