选择加入还是选择退出?俄亥俄州双重合格受益人的财务调整背后的选择。

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Athena Koumoutzis, Jennifer Heston-Mullins, Heather R Reece, Katherine M Abbott, John R Bowblis, Robert Applebaum
{"title":"选择加入还是选择退出?俄亥俄州双重合格受益人的财务调整背后的选择。","authors":"Athena Koumoutzis, Jennifer Heston-Mullins, Heather R Reece, Katherine M Abbott, John R Bowblis, Robert Applebaum","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eleven states implemented the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) to better align and care for beneficiaries eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. However, dually eligible beneficiaries could opt-out of the Medicare portion of the demonstration, potentially reducing the initiative's effectiveness. This study describes the extent and effects of opting-in/opting-out in Ohio during the demonstration. Data from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (November 2021) were analyzed, alongside interviews from 36 organizations providing long-term services and supports or acute care services. Of the 42% who opted out, 46% were aged 65 years and older, 43% were aged 45 to 64 years, and 29% were under 45 years. Opt-out rates were 39% for community well members, 44% for those receiving community-based long-term care, and 51% for long-stay nursing facility residents. Care managers and service providers reported challenges with those who opted out, including lack of access to care, poor communication, and insufficient information during care transitions. These issues created barriers to accessing coordinated care for dually eligible beneficiaries, particularly those with complex chronic conditions, limiting the success of the initiative in improving care quality and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Opt-In or Opt-Out? The Choice Behind Financial Alignment for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries in Ohio.\",\"authors\":\"Athena Koumoutzis, Jennifer Heston-Mullins, Heather R Reece, Katherine M Abbott, John R Bowblis, Robert Applebaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Eleven states implemented the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) to better align and care for beneficiaries eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. However, dually eligible beneficiaries could opt-out of the Medicare portion of the demonstration, potentially reducing the initiative's effectiveness. This study describes the extent and effects of opting-in/opting-out in Ohio during the demonstration. Data from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (November 2021) were analyzed, alongside interviews from 36 organizations providing long-term services and supports or acute care services. Of the 42% who opted out, 46% were aged 65 years and older, 43% were aged 45 to 64 years, and 29% were under 45 years. Opt-out rates were 39% for community well members, 44% for those receiving community-based long-term care, and 51% for long-stay nursing facility residents. Care managers and service providers reported challenges with those who opted out, including lack of access to care, poor communication, and insufficient information during care transitions. These issues created barriers to accessing coordinated care for dually eligible beneficiaries, particularly those with complex chronic conditions, limiting the success of the initiative in improving care quality and cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

11个州实施了财务协调倡议(FAI),以更好地协调和照顾符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的受益人。然而,双重合格的受益人可能会选择退出示范的医疗保险部分,这可能会降低该计划的有效性。本研究描述了俄亥俄州在示范期间选择加入/选择退出的程度和影响。分析了俄亥俄州医疗补助部(2021年11月)的数据,以及来自36个提供长期服务和支持或急性护理服务的组织的访谈。在选择退出的42%中,46%的人年龄在65岁及以上,43%的人年龄在45岁至64岁之间,29%的人年龄在45岁以下。社区健康成员的退出率为39%,接受社区长期护理的为44%,长期护理机构居民的退出率为51%。护理管理人员和服务提供者报告了那些选择退出的人面临的挑战,包括缺乏获得护理的机会、沟通不畅以及在护理过渡期间信息不足。这些问题对双重合格受益人,特别是那些患有复杂慢性病的人获得协调一致的护理造成了障碍,限制了该倡议在提高护理质量和成本效益方面的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Opt-In or Opt-Out? The Choice Behind Financial Alignment for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries in Ohio.

Eleven states implemented the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) to better align and care for beneficiaries eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. However, dually eligible beneficiaries could opt-out of the Medicare portion of the demonstration, potentially reducing the initiative's effectiveness. This study describes the extent and effects of opting-in/opting-out in Ohio during the demonstration. Data from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (November 2021) were analyzed, alongside interviews from 36 organizations providing long-term services and supports or acute care services. Of the 42% who opted out, 46% were aged 65 years and older, 43% were aged 45 to 64 years, and 29% were under 45 years. Opt-out rates were 39% for community well members, 44% for those receiving community-based long-term care, and 51% for long-stay nursing facility residents. Care managers and service providers reported challenges with those who opted out, including lack of access to care, poor communication, and insufficient information during care transitions. These issues created barriers to accessing coordinated care for dually eligible beneficiaries, particularly those with complex chronic conditions, limiting the success of the initiative in improving care quality and cost-effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信