Athena Koumoutzis, Jennifer Heston-Mullins, Heather R Reece, Katherine M Abbott, John R Bowblis, Robert Applebaum
{"title":"选择加入还是选择退出?俄亥俄州双重合格受益人的财务调整背后的选择。","authors":"Athena Koumoutzis, Jennifer Heston-Mullins, Heather R Reece, Katherine M Abbott, John R Bowblis, Robert Applebaum","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eleven states implemented the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) to better align and care for beneficiaries eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. However, dually eligible beneficiaries could opt-out of the Medicare portion of the demonstration, potentially reducing the initiative's effectiveness. This study describes the extent and effects of opting-in/opting-out in Ohio during the demonstration. Data from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (November 2021) were analyzed, alongside interviews from 36 organizations providing long-term services and supports or acute care services. Of the 42% who opted out, 46% were aged 65 years and older, 43% were aged 45 to 64 years, and 29% were under 45 years. Opt-out rates were 39% for community well members, 44% for those receiving community-based long-term care, and 51% for long-stay nursing facility residents. Care managers and service providers reported challenges with those who opted out, including lack of access to care, poor communication, and insufficient information during care transitions. These issues created barriers to accessing coordinated care for dually eligible beneficiaries, particularly those with complex chronic conditions, limiting the success of the initiative in improving care quality and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Opt-In or Opt-Out? The Choice Behind Financial Alignment for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries in Ohio.\",\"authors\":\"Athena Koumoutzis, Jennifer Heston-Mullins, Heather R Reece, Katherine M Abbott, John R Bowblis, Robert Applebaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Eleven states implemented the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) to better align and care for beneficiaries eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. However, dually eligible beneficiaries could opt-out of the Medicare portion of the demonstration, potentially reducing the initiative's effectiveness. This study describes the extent and effects of opting-in/opting-out in Ohio during the demonstration. Data from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (November 2021) were analyzed, alongside interviews from 36 organizations providing long-term services and supports or acute care services. Of the 42% who opted out, 46% were aged 65 years and older, 43% were aged 45 to 64 years, and 29% were under 45 years. Opt-out rates were 39% for community well members, 44% for those receiving community-based long-term care, and 51% for long-stay nursing facility residents. Care managers and service providers reported challenges with those who opted out, including lack of access to care, poor communication, and insufficient information during care transitions. These issues created barriers to accessing coordinated care for dually eligible beneficiaries, particularly those with complex chronic conditions, limiting the success of the initiative in improving care quality and cost-effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2528582","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
To Opt-In or Opt-Out? The Choice Behind Financial Alignment for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries in Ohio.
Eleven states implemented the Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) to better align and care for beneficiaries eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. However, dually eligible beneficiaries could opt-out of the Medicare portion of the demonstration, potentially reducing the initiative's effectiveness. This study describes the extent and effects of opting-in/opting-out in Ohio during the demonstration. Data from the Ohio Department of Medicaid (November 2021) were analyzed, alongside interviews from 36 organizations providing long-term services and supports or acute care services. Of the 42% who opted out, 46% were aged 65 years and older, 43% were aged 45 to 64 years, and 29% were under 45 years. Opt-out rates were 39% for community well members, 44% for those receiving community-based long-term care, and 51% for long-stay nursing facility residents. Care managers and service providers reported challenges with those who opted out, including lack of access to care, poor communication, and insufficient information during care transitions. These issues created barriers to accessing coordinated care for dually eligible beneficiaries, particularly those with complex chronic conditions, limiting the success of the initiative in improving care quality and cost-effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim.
The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.