热消融治疗不确定甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性:文献综述和荟萃分析。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0679
Hunjong Lim, Se Jin Cho, Younbeom Jeong, So Yeong Jeong, Jung Hwan Baek
{"title":"热消融治疗不确定甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性:文献综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hunjong Lim, Se Jin Cho, Younbeom Jeong, So Yeong Jeong, Jung Hwan Baek","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The management of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs), classified as Bethesda III and IV, is challenging due to biopsy limitations in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. While diagnostic lobectomy is the standard, thermal ablation (TA) is increasingly considered for patients ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA for ITNs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was conducted through May 11, 2025, for studies on ITNs treated with TA, with ≥12 months of follow-up and reported clinical or safety outcomes. Case reports, abstracts, and reviews were excluded. Two radiologists independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes included volume reduction rate (VRR), regrowth, delayed surgeries, malignancy detection, and complications. The Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS) tool was used for quality assessment. A random-effects model synthesized pooled estimates, with heterogeneity quantified by Higgins' <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 15 studies with 1149 nodules were analyzed, showing progressive VRR increase, plateauing at 48 months. The pooled 12-month VRR was 81.0% (confidence interval: 76.0-85.9%). Hydrodissection significantly improved VRR at 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.03), while larger nodules were more prone to regrowth. Major complications occurred in 1.8% (21/1149), with no reported metastasis. Regrowth and delayed surgery occurred in 2.3% (26/1149) and 0.3% (4/1149), respectively, with three malignancies upon delayed surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> TA may be considered a minimally invasive alternative for ITNs who are not candidates for or decline surgery, demonstrating favorable efficacy and safety. However, study limitations, short follow-up, and residual malignancy risk necessitate careful follow-up, particularly for larger nodules. Advanced TA techniques such as hydrodissection may enhance outcomes by increasing the likelihood of complete ablation. Long-term prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to confirm TA's role in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":"35 7","pages":"748-762"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hunjong Lim, Se Jin Cho, Younbeom Jeong, So Yeong Jeong, Jung Hwan Baek\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/thy.2024.0679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The management of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs), classified as Bethesda III and IV, is challenging due to biopsy limitations in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. While diagnostic lobectomy is the standard, thermal ablation (TA) is increasingly considered for patients ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA for ITNs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was conducted through May 11, 2025, for studies on ITNs treated with TA, with ≥12 months of follow-up and reported clinical or safety outcomes. Case reports, abstracts, and reviews were excluded. Two radiologists independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes included volume reduction rate (VRR), regrowth, delayed surgeries, malignancy detection, and complications. The Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS) tool was used for quality assessment. A random-effects model synthesized pooled estimates, with heterogeneity quantified by Higgins' <i>I</i><sup>2</sup>. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 15 studies with 1149 nodules were analyzed, showing progressive VRR increase, plateauing at 48 months. The pooled 12-month VRR was 81.0% (confidence interval: 76.0-85.9%). Hydrodissection significantly improved VRR at 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.03), while larger nodules were more prone to regrowth. Major complications occurred in 1.8% (21/1149), with no reported metastasis. Regrowth and delayed surgery occurred in 2.3% (26/1149) and 0.3% (4/1149), respectively, with three malignancies upon delayed surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> TA may be considered a minimally invasive alternative for ITNs who are not candidates for or decline surgery, demonstrating favorable efficacy and safety. However, study limitations, short follow-up, and residual malignancy risk necessitate careful follow-up, particularly for larger nodules. Advanced TA techniques such as hydrodissection may enhance outcomes by increasing the likelihood of complete ablation. Long-term prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to confirm TA's role in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid\",\"volume\":\"35 7\",\"pages\":\"748-762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0679\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不确定甲状腺结节(ITNs)被分类为Bethesda III和IV,由于活检在区分良性和恶性结节方面的局限性,其治疗具有挑战性。虽然诊断性肺叶切除术是标准,但热消融(TA)越来越多地被考虑用于不符合条件或不愿接受手术的患者。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了TA治疗ITNs的有效性和安全性。方法:到2025年5月11日,对MEDLINE、EMBASE和COCHRANE数据库进行全面检索,纳入接受TA治疗的ITNs研究,随访≥12个月,并报告临床或安全性结果。排除病例报告、摘要和综述。两名放射科医生独立进行数据提取和质量评估。结果包括体积缩小率(VRR)、再生、延迟手术、恶性检测和并发症。采用非随机研究的偏倚风险(RoBANS)工具进行质量评价。随机效应模型综合了综合估计,并通过Higgins的I2对异质性进行了量化。结果:共分析了15项研究,共1149例结节,VRR呈进行性增加,在48个月时达到稳定期。合计12个月VRR为81.0%(置信区间:76.0-85.9%)。水解剖可显著提高6个月时的VRR (p = 0.03),而较大的结节更容易再生。主要并发症发生率为1.8%(21/1149),无转移报道。再生和延迟手术发生率分别为2.3%(26/1149)和0.3%(4/1149),延迟手术后有3个恶性肿瘤。结论:TA可以被认为是不适合或拒绝手术的ITNs的微创选择,具有良好的疗效和安全性。然而,由于研究的局限性、随访时间短和残留的恶性肿瘤风险,需要仔细的随访,特别是对于较大的结节。先进的TA技术如氢化解剖可以通过增加完全消融的可能性来提高结果。需要长期的前瞻性研究和随机试验来证实TA在临床实践中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The management of indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs), classified as Bethesda III and IV, is challenging due to biopsy limitations in distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. While diagnostic lobectomy is the standard, thermal ablation (TA) is increasingly considered for patients ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore evaluate the efficacy and safety of TA for ITNs. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases was conducted through May 11, 2025, for studies on ITNs treated with TA, with ≥12 months of follow-up and reported clinical or safety outcomes. Case reports, abstracts, and reviews were excluded. Two radiologists independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes included volume reduction rate (VRR), regrowth, delayed surgeries, malignancy detection, and complications. The Risk of Bias for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS) tool was used for quality assessment. A random-effects model synthesized pooled estimates, with heterogeneity quantified by Higgins' I2. Results: A total of 15 studies with 1149 nodules were analyzed, showing progressive VRR increase, plateauing at 48 months. The pooled 12-month VRR was 81.0% (confidence interval: 76.0-85.9%). Hydrodissection significantly improved VRR at 6 months (p = 0.03), while larger nodules were more prone to regrowth. Major complications occurred in 1.8% (21/1149), with no reported metastasis. Regrowth and delayed surgery occurred in 2.3% (26/1149) and 0.3% (4/1149), respectively, with three malignancies upon delayed surgery. Conclusions: TA may be considered a minimally invasive alternative for ITNs who are not candidates for or decline surgery, demonstrating favorable efficacy and safety. However, study limitations, short follow-up, and residual malignancy risk necessitate careful follow-up, particularly for larger nodules. Advanced TA techniques such as hydrodissection may enhance outcomes by increasing the likelihood of complete ablation. Long-term prospective studies and randomized trials are needed to confirm TA's role in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信