预防HIV感染的暴露前预防:北卡罗来纳州性少数群体和性别少数群体的认知。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hayley E Cunningham, Dirk A Davis, Charles M Burns, Katherine Link, Sara LeGrand, Carly Kelley, Kathryn Whetten, Mehri S McKellar
{"title":"预防HIV感染的暴露前预防:北卡罗来纳州性少数群体和性别少数群体的认知。","authors":"Hayley E Cunningham, Dirk A Davis, Charles M Burns, Katherine Link, Sara LeGrand, Carly Kelley, Kathryn Whetten, Mehri S McKellar","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be underprescribed preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but PrEP research on SGM communities other than transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men is limited. We sought to better understand SGM individuals' vulnerability to HIV acquisition and awareness and perceptions of PrEP in North Carolina, with a focus on SGM groups less often included in research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 37-item online survey to adult SGM participants, examining differences in perceived and behavioral HIV risk based on self-reported behaviors. We also compared PrEP awareness, prescriptions, and stigma between SGM identities and used logistic regression to examine associations between HIV risk and PrEP use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 372 participants completed the survey. Although 30.9% reported behaviors that increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition, only 9.5% perceived their risk as elevated. Most (78.5%) were aware of PrEP, but only 15.1% had been prescribed PrEP. PrEP stigma was most pervasive among cisgender women. Nonbinary and queer participants were more likely to have experienced mistreatment by a provider (20.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 19.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and avoid care fearing mistreatment (31.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 27.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with the entire sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP is prescribed at low rates across many SGM communities, with misperception of HIV risk, PrEP stigma, and mistreatment in health care identified as important barriers. Healthcare providers should take steps to create a safe environment for SGM patients and ask all patients about HIV risk factors and provide information about PrEP regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 7","pages":"357-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Acquisition: Perceptions among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals in North Carolina.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley E Cunningham, Dirk A Davis, Charles M Burns, Katherine Link, Sara LeGrand, Carly Kelley, Kathryn Whetten, Mehri S McKellar\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be underprescribed preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but PrEP research on SGM communities other than transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men is limited. We sought to better understand SGM individuals' vulnerability to HIV acquisition and awareness and perceptions of PrEP in North Carolina, with a focus on SGM groups less often included in research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a 37-item online survey to adult SGM participants, examining differences in perceived and behavioral HIV risk based on self-reported behaviors. We also compared PrEP awareness, prescriptions, and stigma between SGM identities and used logistic regression to examine associations between HIV risk and PrEP use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 372 participants completed the survey. Although 30.9% reported behaviors that increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition, only 9.5% perceived their risk as elevated. Most (78.5%) were aware of PrEP, but only 15.1% had been prescribed PrEP. PrEP stigma was most pervasive among cisgender women. Nonbinary and queer participants were more likely to have experienced mistreatment by a provider (20.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 19.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and avoid care fearing mistreatment (31.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 27.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with the entire sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP is prescribed at low rates across many SGM communities, with misperception of HIV risk, PrEP stigma, and mistreatment in health care identified as important barriers. Healthcare providers should take steps to create a safe environment for SGM patients and ask all patients about HIV risk factors and provide information about PrEP regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"118 7\",\"pages\":\"357-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)风险增加的性少数和性别少数群体(SGM)社区可能未充分规定暴露前预防(PrEP),但对除跨性别女性和男男性行为的异性恋男性以外的SGM社区的PrEP研究有限。我们试图更好地了解北卡罗莱纳州SGM个体对艾滋病毒感染的脆弱性以及对PrEP的认识和看法,重点关注不常被纳入研究的SGM群体。方法:我们对成年SGM参与者进行了一项37项的在线调查,检查了基于自我报告行为的感知和行为HIV风险的差异。我们还比较了SGM身份之间的PrEP意识、处方和耻辱,并使用逻辑回归来检查HIV风险与PrEP使用之间的关系。结果:共有372名参与者完成了调查。尽管30.9%的人报告说他们的行为增加了感染艾滋病毒的可能性,但只有9.5%的人认为他们的风险增加了。大多数人(78.5%)知道PrEP,但只有15.1%的人开过PrEP处方。PrEP耻辱感在顺性女性中最为普遍。非二元和酷儿参与者更有可能经历过提供者的虐待(20.3%,P < 0.0001;19.2%, P < 0.01)、怕虐待避免护理(31.9%,P < 0.001;27.7%;P < 0.001),与整个样本相比。结论:在许多SGM社区,PrEP的处方率很低,对艾滋病毒风险的误解、PrEP的污名化和卫生保健中的虐待被认为是重要的障碍。医疗保健提供者应采取措施为性生殖器割礼患者创造一个安全的环境,向所有患者询问艾滋病毒的风险因素,并提供有关预防措施的信息,无论其性取向或性别认同如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Acquisition: Perceptions among Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals in North Carolina.

Objectives: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be underprescribed preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but PrEP research on SGM communities other than transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men is limited. We sought to better understand SGM individuals' vulnerability to HIV acquisition and awareness and perceptions of PrEP in North Carolina, with a focus on SGM groups less often included in research.

Methods: We administered a 37-item online survey to adult SGM participants, examining differences in perceived and behavioral HIV risk based on self-reported behaviors. We also compared PrEP awareness, prescriptions, and stigma between SGM identities and used logistic regression to examine associations between HIV risk and PrEP use.

Results: In total, 372 participants completed the survey. Although 30.9% reported behaviors that increase the likelihood of HIV acquisition, only 9.5% perceived their risk as elevated. Most (78.5%) were aware of PrEP, but only 15.1% had been prescribed PrEP. PrEP stigma was most pervasive among cisgender women. Nonbinary and queer participants were more likely to have experienced mistreatment by a provider (20.3%, P < 0.0001; 19.2%, P < 0.01) and avoid care fearing mistreatment (31.9%, P < 0.001; 27.7%; P < 0.001) compared with the entire sample.

Conclusions: PrEP is prescribed at low rates across many SGM communities, with misperception of HIV risk, PrEP stigma, and mistreatment in health care identified as important barriers. Healthcare providers should take steps to create a safe environment for SGM patients and ask all patients about HIV risk factors and provide information about PrEP regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信