美国医疗补助管理的长期服务和支持支出对养老院护理质量的影响。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jennifer L Choi, Michael Lepore, Alison M Trinkoff, Catherine E Cooke, T Joseph Mattingly
{"title":"美国医疗补助管理的长期服务和支持支出对养老院护理质量的影响。","authors":"Jennifer L Choi, Michael Lepore, Alison M Trinkoff, Catherine E Cooke, T Joseph Mattingly","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of US states operating Medicaid managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) programs grew from 8 to 24 between 2004 and 2019, driven by the challenges of an aging population. Significant heterogeneity exists across states in program features, structure, and spending. This study examined whether spending dimensions, specifically capitation rates and market coverage rates (the proportion of Medicaid nursing home expenditures distributed through managed care), influence the quality of care in nursing homes within MLTSS states.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of data on MLTSS program spending constructed by the authors, merged with publicly available cross-sectional nursing home data from LTCFocus and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The sample included 2169 nursing homes operating in 6 states (Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, and Tennessee) with mandatory and statewide MLTSS programs as of fiscal year 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiple regression model was estimated to examine the relationship between nursing home quality outcomes and state-level spending measures, controlling for key nursing home, county, and state control measures. Sensitivity analyses included additional controls for metropolitan statistical area indicators and wage indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher capitation rates consistently contributed to improved quality of care, as evidenced by increased staffing hours, lower proportions of long-stay residents with increased daily activity needs, loss of bladder control, and urinary tract infections. In contrast, the associations between coverage rates and care quality measures remained inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This study highlights how capitation rates positively influence care quality in nursing homes within the MLTSS context. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, health care administrators, and managed care organizations seeking to optimize care quality in MLTSS programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105772"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Medicaid Managed Long-Term Services and Supports Spending on Nursing Home Care Quality in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Choi, Michael Lepore, Alison M Trinkoff, Catherine E Cooke, T Joseph Mattingly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The number of US states operating Medicaid managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) programs grew from 8 to 24 between 2004 and 2019, driven by the challenges of an aging population. Significant heterogeneity exists across states in program features, structure, and spending. This study examined whether spending dimensions, specifically capitation rates and market coverage rates (the proportion of Medicaid nursing home expenditures distributed through managed care), influence the quality of care in nursing homes within MLTSS states.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of data on MLTSS program spending constructed by the authors, merged with publicly available cross-sectional nursing home data from LTCFocus and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The sample included 2169 nursing homes operating in 6 states (Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, and Tennessee) with mandatory and statewide MLTSS programs as of fiscal year 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiple regression model was estimated to examine the relationship between nursing home quality outcomes and state-level spending measures, controlling for key nursing home, county, and state control measures. Sensitivity analyses included additional controls for metropolitan statistical area indicators and wage indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher capitation rates consistently contributed to improved quality of care, as evidenced by increased staffing hours, lower proportions of long-stay residents with increased daily activity needs, loss of bladder control, and urinary tract infections. In contrast, the associations between coverage rates and care quality measures remained inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This study highlights how capitation rates positively influence care quality in nursing homes within the MLTSS context. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, health care administrators, and managed care organizations seeking to optimize care quality in MLTSS programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在人口老龄化挑战的推动下,2004年至2019年,美国运营医疗补助管理的长期服务和支持(MLTSS)项目的州从8个增加到24个。各州在项目特征、结构和支出方面存在显著的异质性。本研究考察了支出维度,特别是人均率和市场覆盖率(通过管理式护理分配的医疗补助养老院支出的比例)是否会影响MLTSS州内养老院的护理质量。设计:对作者构建的MLTSS项目支出数据进行二次分析,并将LTCFocus和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心提供的公开横截面养老院数据合并。环境和参与者:样本包括6个州(亚利桑那州、特拉华州、佛罗里达州、爱荷华州、新泽西州和田纳西州)的2169家养老院,截至2019财年,这些养老院在全州范围内实施了强制性的MLTSS计划。方法:采用多元回归模型,控制重点养老院、县和州的控制措施,检验养老院质量结果与国家级支出措施之间的关系。敏感性分析包括对大都市统计区域指标和工资指数的额外控制。结果:较高的人头率始终有助于提高护理质量,这可以从增加的工作人员工作时间、较低的长期住院患者比例、增加的日常活动需求、膀胱失控和尿路感染等方面得到证明。相比之下,覆盖率和护理质量之间的联系仍然没有定论。结论和启示:本研究强调了在MLTSS背景下,人均收入率如何积极影响养老院的护理质量。研究结果为决策者、卫生保健管理者和寻求优化MLTSS项目护理质量的管理护理组织提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Medicaid Managed Long-Term Services and Supports Spending on Nursing Home Care Quality in the United States.

Objectives: The number of US states operating Medicaid managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) programs grew from 8 to 24 between 2004 and 2019, driven by the challenges of an aging population. Significant heterogeneity exists across states in program features, structure, and spending. This study examined whether spending dimensions, specifically capitation rates and market coverage rates (the proportion of Medicaid nursing home expenditures distributed through managed care), influence the quality of care in nursing homes within MLTSS states.

Design: Secondary analysis of data on MLTSS program spending constructed by the authors, merged with publicly available cross-sectional nursing home data from LTCFocus and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Setting and participants: The sample included 2169 nursing homes operating in 6 states (Arizona, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, and Tennessee) with mandatory and statewide MLTSS programs as of fiscal year 2019.

Methods: A multiple regression model was estimated to examine the relationship between nursing home quality outcomes and state-level spending measures, controlling for key nursing home, county, and state control measures. Sensitivity analyses included additional controls for metropolitan statistical area indicators and wage indices.

Results: Higher capitation rates consistently contributed to improved quality of care, as evidenced by increased staffing hours, lower proportions of long-stay residents with increased daily activity needs, loss of bladder control, and urinary tract infections. In contrast, the associations between coverage rates and care quality measures remained inconclusive.

Conclusions and implications: This study highlights how capitation rates positively influence care quality in nursing homes within the MLTSS context. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, health care administrators, and managed care organizations seeking to optimize care quality in MLTSS programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信