诊断神经认知障碍的临床途径:从记忆临床队列的过程挖掘的见解。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Claudio Singh Solorzano, Stefania Orini, Cristina Festari, Simona Buscarnera, Francesco Rossato, Michela Pievani, Matteo Cotta Ramusino, Federico Massa, Roberto Gatta, Giovanni Battista Frisoni
{"title":"诊断神经认知障碍的临床途径:从记忆临床队列的过程挖掘的见解。","authors":"Claudio Singh Solorzano, Stefania Orini, Cristina Festari, Simona Buscarnera, Francesco Rossato, Michela Pievani, Matteo Cotta Ramusino, Federico Massa, Roberto Gatta, Giovanni Battista Frisoni","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Process mining (PM) has only recently been used in medicine. Its implementation in the dementia field could be valuable, considering the epidemiologic breadth of the condition and its economic implications. This proof-of-concept study aims to apply PM in the context of dementia to provide a realistic picture of patients' diagnostic pathways in a memory clinic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A total of 539 medical charts were reviewed to obtain sociodemographic data and type and timing of diagnostic evaluations (eg, clinical or neuropsychological visits, imaging scans, and fluid biomarker analyses).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a PM approach to create a process map from the clinical events and visualize the most common diagnostic pathways in the total cohort and subcohort of patients. PM techniques represent the temporal and dynamic sequence of clinical events in the patients' journeys, overcoming the traditional frequency analyses focused only on aggregate statistics and event distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the diagnosis was typically reached during the third clinical visit, following the results of instrumental examinations (ie, morphologic imaging, routine blood and neuropsychological examinations) and a first-line diagnostic biomarker. In mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia (DEM) subcohorts, cerebrospinal fluid analyses are the most frequently used first-line biomarkers to ascertain a suspicion of Alzheimer disease (23%). Differential PM analyses revealed that the DEM subcohort underwent morphologic imaging before accessing the memory clinic more often than the MCI subcohort (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This preliminary use of PM algorithms in memory clinics shows promising results in visualizing and measuring real-world diagnostic pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105774"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Pathways for Diagnosing Neurocognitive Disorders: Insights From Process Mining a Memory Clinic Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Singh Solorzano, Stefania Orini, Cristina Festari, Simona Buscarnera, Francesco Rossato, Michela Pievani, Matteo Cotta Ramusino, Federico Massa, Roberto Gatta, Giovanni Battista Frisoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Process mining (PM) has only recently been used in medicine. Its implementation in the dementia field could be valuable, considering the epidemiologic breadth of the condition and its economic implications. This proof-of-concept study aims to apply PM in the context of dementia to provide a realistic picture of patients' diagnostic pathways in a memory clinic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>A total of 539 medical charts were reviewed to obtain sociodemographic data and type and timing of diagnostic evaluations (eg, clinical or neuropsychological visits, imaging scans, and fluid biomarker analyses).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a PM approach to create a process map from the clinical events and visualize the most common diagnostic pathways in the total cohort and subcohort of patients. PM techniques represent the temporal and dynamic sequence of clinical events in the patients' journeys, overcoming the traditional frequency analyses focused only on aggregate statistics and event distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the diagnosis was typically reached during the third clinical visit, following the results of instrumental examinations (ie, morphologic imaging, routine blood and neuropsychological examinations) and a first-line diagnostic biomarker. In mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia (DEM) subcohorts, cerebrospinal fluid analyses are the most frequently used first-line biomarkers to ascertain a suspicion of Alzheimer disease (23%). Differential PM analyses revealed that the DEM subcohort underwent morphologic imaging before accessing the memory clinic more often than the MCI subcohort (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This preliminary use of PM algorithms in memory clinics shows promising results in visualizing and measuring real-world diagnostic pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105774\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105774","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:过程挖掘(PM)直到最近才被用于医学。考虑到痴呆症的流行病学广度及其经济影响,在痴呆症领域的实施可能是有价值的。这项概念验证研究旨在将PM应用于痴呆症的背景下,为记忆诊所中患者的诊断途径提供一个现实的画面。设计:回顾性观察性研究。环境和参与者:共审查了539份医疗图表,以获得社会人口学数据以及诊断评估的类型和时间(例如,临床或神经心理学就诊、成像扫描和液体生物标志物分析)。方法:我们使用PM方法从临床事件创建流程图,并可视化患者总队列和亚队列中最常见的诊断途径。PM技术代表了患者旅程中临床事件的时间和动态序列,克服了传统的频率分析只关注总体统计和事件分布。结果:结果显示,诊断通常是在第三次临床就诊时,根据仪器检查(即形态影像学、常规血液和神经心理检查)和一线诊断生物标志物的结果得出的。在轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度痴呆(DEM)亚队列中,脑脊液分析是确定阿尔茨海默病疑似最常用的一线生物标志物(23%)。差异PM分析显示,DEM亚组比MCI亚组更常在进入记忆诊所前进行形态学成像(P < 0.05)。结论和意义:PM算法在记忆诊所的初步应用在可视化和测量真实世界的诊断途径方面显示出有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Pathways for Diagnosing Neurocognitive Disorders: Insights From Process Mining a Memory Clinic Cohort.

Objectives: Process mining (PM) has only recently been used in medicine. Its implementation in the dementia field could be valuable, considering the epidemiologic breadth of the condition and its economic implications. This proof-of-concept study aims to apply PM in the context of dementia to provide a realistic picture of patients' diagnostic pathways in a memory clinic.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting and participants: A total of 539 medical charts were reviewed to obtain sociodemographic data and type and timing of diagnostic evaluations (eg, clinical or neuropsychological visits, imaging scans, and fluid biomarker analyses).

Methods: We used a PM approach to create a process map from the clinical events and visualize the most common diagnostic pathways in the total cohort and subcohort of patients. PM techniques represent the temporal and dynamic sequence of clinical events in the patients' journeys, overcoming the traditional frequency analyses focused only on aggregate statistics and event distributions.

Results: The results showed that the diagnosis was typically reached during the third clinical visit, following the results of instrumental examinations (ie, morphologic imaging, routine blood and neuropsychological examinations) and a first-line diagnostic biomarker. In mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia (DEM) subcohorts, cerebrospinal fluid analyses are the most frequently used first-line biomarkers to ascertain a suspicion of Alzheimer disease (23%). Differential PM analyses revealed that the DEM subcohort underwent morphologic imaging before accessing the memory clinic more often than the MCI subcohort (P < .05).

Conclusions and implications: This preliminary use of PM algorithms in memory clinics shows promising results in visualizing and measuring real-world diagnostic pathways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信