Caitlin MP Jones, Christopher G Maher, Rachelle Buchbinder, Ian A Harris, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Christopher Hayes, Alexandra Gorelik
{"title":"2011-22年澳大利亚私营健康保险公司的脊髓刺激护理模式、再干预和成本:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Caitlin MP Jones, Christopher G Maher, Rachelle Buchbinder, Ian A Harris, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Christopher Hayes, Alexandra Gorelik","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate spinal cord stimulation patterns of care, the proportions of people who require unplanned surgical interventions after receiving definitive spinal cord stimulator implants, and the costs to private health insurers in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective observational study; analysis of deidentified private health care insurers benefits payments data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\n \n <p>People admitted to hospital for spinal cord stimulation-related surgical procedures, 11 January 2011 – 13 April 2022, with full or partial costs coverage by five general private health care insurers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Patterns of care; proportions of people with stimulator implants who subsequently require surgical re-intervention, overall and within 36 months of receiving definitive implants; costs to insurer for trial, definitive implantation, and re-interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed data for 11 451 admissions of 5839 people; mean age at first admission was 60.2 years (standard deviation, 15.4 years), 3717 people were women (63.7%). Median follow-up time was 48 months (interquartile range [IQR], 33–72 months). Definitive stimulators were implanted in 4361 people (74.7%), of whom 3244 had previously had at least one stimulation trial (74.3%; one trial only: 2970 people); 1478 people (25.3%) had trials but never proceeded to definitive implants. Surgical re-interventions were required by 1011 people with definitive implants (23.2%); the median time to the first re-intervention was 16.8 months (IQR, 6.2–39.8 months). The cumulative probability of requiring surgical re-intervention at 36 months was 0.35. The median cost to the insurer of a trial implant was $13 689, for a definitive implant (device, medical, and hospital costs for initial procedure and re-interventions) $55 635.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>About one in four people will require surgical re-intervention within 36 months of receiving a definitive spinal cord stimulator, and the costs for the procedure are high. Both findings are concerning given the paucity of evidence for their efficacy in treating chronic pain.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"223 5","pages":"243-247"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.70001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal cord stimulation patterns of care, re-interventions, and costs for private health insurers, Australia, 2011–22: a retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin MP Jones, Christopher G Maher, Rachelle Buchbinder, Ian A Harris, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Christopher Hayes, Alexandra Gorelik\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate spinal cord stimulation patterns of care, the proportions of people who require unplanned surgical interventions after receiving definitive spinal cord stimulator implants, and the costs to private health insurers in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective observational study; analysis of deidentified private health care insurers benefits payments data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>People admitted to hospital for spinal cord stimulation-related surgical procedures, 11 January 2011 – 13 April 2022, with full or partial costs coverage by five general private health care insurers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patterns of care; proportions of people with stimulator implants who subsequently require surgical re-intervention, overall and within 36 months of receiving definitive implants; costs to insurer for trial, definitive implantation, and re-interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analysed data for 11 451 admissions of 5839 people; mean age at first admission was 60.2 years (standard deviation, 15.4 years), 3717 people were women (63.7%). Median follow-up time was 48 months (interquartile range [IQR], 33–72 months). Definitive stimulators were implanted in 4361 people (74.7%), of whom 3244 had previously had at least one stimulation trial (74.3%; one trial only: 2970 people); 1478 people (25.3%) had trials but never proceeded to definitive implants. Surgical re-interventions were required by 1011 people with definitive implants (23.2%); the median time to the first re-intervention was 16.8 months (IQR, 6.2–39.8 months). The cumulative probability of requiring surgical re-intervention at 36 months was 0.35. The median cost to the insurer of a trial implant was $13 689, for a definitive implant (device, medical, and hospital costs for initial procedure and re-interventions) $55 635.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>About one in four people will require surgical re-intervention within 36 months of receiving a definitive spinal cord stimulator, and the costs for the procedure are high. Both findings are concerning given the paucity of evidence for their efficacy in treating chronic pain.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"223 5\",\"pages\":\"243-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.70001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.70001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spinal cord stimulation patterns of care, re-interventions, and costs for private health insurers, Australia, 2011–22: a retrospective observational study
Objectives
To investigate spinal cord stimulation patterns of care, the proportions of people who require unplanned surgical interventions after receiving definitive spinal cord stimulator implants, and the costs to private health insurers in Australia.
Study design
Retrospective observational study; analysis of deidentified private health care insurers benefits payments data.
Setting, participants
People admitted to hospital for spinal cord stimulation-related surgical procedures, 11 January 2011 – 13 April 2022, with full or partial costs coverage by five general private health care insurers.
Main outcome measures
Patterns of care; proportions of people with stimulator implants who subsequently require surgical re-intervention, overall and within 36 months of receiving definitive implants; costs to insurer for trial, definitive implantation, and re-interventions.
Results
We analysed data for 11 451 admissions of 5839 people; mean age at first admission was 60.2 years (standard deviation, 15.4 years), 3717 people were women (63.7%). Median follow-up time was 48 months (interquartile range [IQR], 33–72 months). Definitive stimulators were implanted in 4361 people (74.7%), of whom 3244 had previously had at least one stimulation trial (74.3%; one trial only: 2970 people); 1478 people (25.3%) had trials but never proceeded to definitive implants. Surgical re-interventions were required by 1011 people with definitive implants (23.2%); the median time to the first re-intervention was 16.8 months (IQR, 6.2–39.8 months). The cumulative probability of requiring surgical re-intervention at 36 months was 0.35. The median cost to the insurer of a trial implant was $13 689, for a definitive implant (device, medical, and hospital costs for initial procedure and re-interventions) $55 635.
Conclusions
About one in four people will require surgical re-intervention within 36 months of receiving a definitive spinal cord stimulator, and the costs for the procedure are high. Both findings are concerning given the paucity of evidence for their efficacy in treating chronic pain.
期刊介绍:
The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.