{"title":"当美沙酮在癌症疼痛治疗中失败时。回顾性分析。","authors":"Sebastiano Mercadante MD, Alessio Lo Cascio RN","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Methadone is increasingly used. It is expected that some patients will lose the analgesic response or develop adverse effects. Opioid switching (OS) from methadone to other opioids has not been well described</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The charts of patients with cancer pain receiving methadone, both intravenously and orally were reviewed for a period of two years (2023–2024). Patients who were switched from methadone, prescribed prior to or during admission to APCU were collected and analyzed. Epidemiological data were recorded. Opioid drugs, doses and route of administration prior to admission, at admission and at discharge were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the period taken into consideration ten patients were switched from methadone to other opioids. The final treatment included morphine and transdermal buprenorphine, in four and four patients, respectively, intravenous fentanyl in one patient, and spinal analgesia in one patient. Significant improvements were reported at time of discharge for most symptoms, with a decrease of total burden (<em>P</em> = 0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>OS from methadone was effective in most cases, but the treatment was challenging as higher doses of opioids are expected, due to the loss of the extra-opioid analgesic effects of methadone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages e266-e271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Methadone Fails in Cancer Pain Management: A Retrospective Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiano Mercadante MD, Alessio Lo Cascio RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Methadone is increasingly used. It is expected that some patients will lose the analgesic response or develop adverse effects. Opioid switching (OS) from methadone to other opioids has not been well described</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The charts of patients with cancer pain receiving methadone, both intravenously and orally were reviewed for a period of two years (2023–2024). Patients who were switched from methadone, prescribed prior to or during admission to APCU were collected and analyzed. Epidemiological data were recorded. Opioid drugs, doses and route of administration prior to admission, at admission and at discharge were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the period taken into consideration ten patients were switched from methadone to other opioids. The final treatment included morphine and transdermal buprenorphine, in four and four patients, respectively, intravenous fentanyl in one patient, and spinal analgesia in one patient. Significant improvements were reported at time of discharge for most symptoms, with a decrease of total burden (<em>P</em> = 0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>OS from methadone was effective in most cases, but the treatment was challenging as higher doses of opioids are expected, due to the loss of the extra-opioid analgesic effects of methadone.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages e266-e271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425007110\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425007110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Methadone Fails in Cancer Pain Management: A Retrospective Analysis
Background
Methadone is increasingly used. It is expected that some patients will lose the analgesic response or develop adverse effects. Opioid switching (OS) from methadone to other opioids has not been well described
Methods
The charts of patients with cancer pain receiving methadone, both intravenously and orally were reviewed for a period of two years (2023–2024). Patients who were switched from methadone, prescribed prior to or during admission to APCU were collected and analyzed. Epidemiological data were recorded. Opioid drugs, doses and route of administration prior to admission, at admission and at discharge were recorded.
Results
In the period taken into consideration ten patients were switched from methadone to other opioids. The final treatment included morphine and transdermal buprenorphine, in four and four patients, respectively, intravenous fentanyl in one patient, and spinal analgesia in one patient. Significant improvements were reported at time of discharge for most symptoms, with a decrease of total burden (P = 0.005).
Conclusion
OS from methadone was effective in most cases, but the treatment was challenging as higher doses of opioids are expected, due to the loss of the extra-opioid analgesic effects of methadone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.