让慢性心力衰竭的人喝酒?来自FRESH-UP研究的见解。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lucija Cosic, Francesca Musella, Alberto Palazzuoli, Jozine M Ter Maaten
{"title":"让慢性心力衰竭的人喝酒?来自FRESH-UP研究的见解。","authors":"Lucija Cosic, Francesca Musella, Alberto Palazzuoli, Jozine M Ter Maaten","doi":"10.1007/s10741-025-10544-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is characterized by increased neurohormonal activation leading to sodium and water retention. Consequently, sodium and fluid restriction have long been pragmatic cornerstones in the management of HF, despite the lack of high-quality evidence to support their efficacy. This meeting report reviews the recently published Fluid Restriction in Heart Failure versus Liberal Uptake (FRESH-UP) trial, an open-label, randomized controlled study comparing restricted fluid intake (1500 mL/day) with liberal intake in patients with stable, chronic HF. At 6 weeks, the observed difference in daily fluid intake between the two arms was 284 mL, which was not associated with significant differences in health-related quality of life or safety, challenging the longstanding practice of routine fluid restriction. We provide a comprehensive analysis of these findings in the context of prior evidence and conclude that liberal fluid intake appears safe in patients with stable chronic HF on optimized guideline-directed medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let the drinks flow in chronic heart failure? Insights from the FRESH-UP study.\",\"authors\":\"Lucija Cosic, Francesca Musella, Alberto Palazzuoli, Jozine M Ter Maaten\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10741-025-10544-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is characterized by increased neurohormonal activation leading to sodium and water retention. Consequently, sodium and fluid restriction have long been pragmatic cornerstones in the management of HF, despite the lack of high-quality evidence to support their efficacy. This meeting report reviews the recently published Fluid Restriction in Heart Failure versus Liberal Uptake (FRESH-UP) trial, an open-label, randomized controlled study comparing restricted fluid intake (1500 mL/day) with liberal intake in patients with stable, chronic HF. At 6 weeks, the observed difference in daily fluid intake between the two arms was 284 mL, which was not associated with significant differences in health-related quality of life or safety, challenging the longstanding practice of routine fluid restriction. We provide a comprehensive analysis of these findings in the context of prior evidence and conclude that liberal fluid intake appears safe in patients with stable chronic HF on optimized guideline-directed medical therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-025-10544-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-025-10544-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心力衰竭(HF)的特点是神经激素激活增加,导致钠和水潴留。因此,钠和液体限制长期以来一直是心衰治疗的实用基础,尽管缺乏高质量的证据来支持其疗效。本次会议报告回顾了最近发表的液体限制与心力衰竭自由摄取(FRESH-UP)试验,这是一项开放标签、随机对照研究,比较了稳定的慢性心力衰竭患者限制液体摄入(1500 mL/天)和自由摄入。在6周时,观察到两组之间每日液体摄入量的差异为284 mL,这与健康相关的生活质量或安全性的显着差异无关,挑战了长期以来常规液体限制的做法。我们在先前证据的背景下对这些发现进行了全面的分析,并得出结论:在优化的指导药物治疗下,稳定的慢性心力衰竭患者自由液体摄入是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let the drinks flow in chronic heart failure? Insights from the FRESH-UP study.

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by increased neurohormonal activation leading to sodium and water retention. Consequently, sodium and fluid restriction have long been pragmatic cornerstones in the management of HF, despite the lack of high-quality evidence to support their efficacy. This meeting report reviews the recently published Fluid Restriction in Heart Failure versus Liberal Uptake (FRESH-UP) trial, an open-label, randomized controlled study comparing restricted fluid intake (1500 mL/day) with liberal intake in patients with stable, chronic HF. At 6 weeks, the observed difference in daily fluid intake between the two arms was 284 mL, which was not associated with significant differences in health-related quality of life or safety, challenging the longstanding practice of routine fluid restriction. We provide a comprehensive analysis of these findings in the context of prior evidence and conclude that liberal fluid intake appears safe in patients with stable chronic HF on optimized guideline-directed medical therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信