低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)用于肺癌筛查的系统证据综述。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2531428
Stany Mathew, Gowthaman Thangavel, Praveen Pujar, Apourv Pant, Anita Nath
{"title":"低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)用于肺癌筛查的系统证据综述。","authors":"Stany Mathew, Gowthaman Thangavel, Praveen Pujar, Apourv Pant, Anita Nath","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2531428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite lung cancer's high mortality rate, many countries still lack organized lung cancer screening programs. This review aims to evaluate the impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer diagnosis, mortality, and overall clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for umbrella reviews, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for reviews published between January 2013 and December 2023. Eligible meta-analyses included studies comparing LDCT screening with chest X-ray (CXR) or no screening, reporting outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, and lung cancer mortality. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 801 citations, 14 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. LDCT demonstrated high sensitivity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and specificity (0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.91). It significantly increased early-stage lung cancer detection (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18-1.45) and reduced lung cancer mortality by 18% (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.90). However, the reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06) was not statistically significant. Overdiagnosis and false positives remain essential challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review confirms that LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer mortality, particularly in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2649-2661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An umbrella review of systematic evidence on the Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Stany Mathew, Gowthaman Thangavel, Praveen Pujar, Apourv Pant, Anita Nath\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796694.2025.2531428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Despite lung cancer's high mortality rate, many countries still lack organized lung cancer screening programs. This review aims to evaluate the impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer diagnosis, mortality, and overall clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for umbrella reviews, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for reviews published between January 2013 and December 2023. Eligible meta-analyses included studies comparing LDCT screening with chest X-ray (CXR) or no screening, reporting outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, and lung cancer mortality. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 801 citations, 14 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. LDCT demonstrated high sensitivity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and specificity (0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.91). It significantly increased early-stage lung cancer detection (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18-1.45) and reduced lung cancer mortality by 18% (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.90). However, the reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06) was not statistically significant. Overdiagnosis and false positives remain essential challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review confirms that LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer mortality, particularly in high-risk populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2649-2661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2531428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2531428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管肺癌的死亡率很高,但许多国家仍然缺乏有组织的肺癌筛查项目。本综述旨在评估低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌诊断、死亡率和总体临床结果的影响。材料和方法:按照Joanna Briggs研究所的总结性综述方法,在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Library中进行了全面的检索,检索了2013年1月至2023年12月间发表的综述。合格的荟萃分析包括比较LDCT筛查与胸部x线检查(CXR)或不筛查的研究,报告敏感性、特异性和肺癌死亡率等结果。采用AMSTAR-2评价纳入的评价的方法学质量。结果:801篇引用中,14篇meta分析符合纳入标准。LDCT显示高灵敏度(0.97,95% CI: 0.94-0.98)和特异性(0.87,95% CI: 0.82-0.91)。它显著提高了早期肺癌的检出率(RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18-1.45),降低了18%的肺癌死亡率(RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.90)。然而,全因死亡率的降低(RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06)无统计学意义。过度诊断和假阳性仍然是主要的挑战。结论:本综述证实LDCT筛查有效降低肺癌死亡率,特别是在高危人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An umbrella review of systematic evidence on the Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening.

Aim: Despite lung cancer's high mortality rate, many countries still lack organized lung cancer screening programs. This review aims to evaluate the impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer diagnosis, mortality, and overall clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for umbrella reviews, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for reviews published between January 2013 and December 2023. Eligible meta-analyses included studies comparing LDCT screening with chest X-ray (CXR) or no screening, reporting outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, and lung cancer mortality. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-2.

Results: Out of 801 citations, 14 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. LDCT demonstrated high sensitivity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and specificity (0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.91). It significantly increased early-stage lung cancer detection (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18-1.45) and reduced lung cancer mortality by 18% (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.90). However, the reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75-1.06) was not statistically significant. Overdiagnosis and false positives remain essential challenges.

Conclusion: This umbrella review confirms that LDCT screening effectively reduces lung cancer mortality, particularly in high-risk populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信