Myrto Bolanaki, Lisa Kurland, Mikkel Brabrand, Ron Daniels, Kiren Govender, Frank Hanses, Francesca Innocenti, Annmarie Lassen, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Martin Möckel
{"title":"当前欧洲急诊科败血症管理实践:isg -急诊科欧洲调查","authors":"Myrto Bolanaki, Lisa Kurland, Mikkel Brabrand, Ron Daniels, Kiren Govender, Frank Hanses, Francesca Innocenti, Annmarie Lassen, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Martin Möckel","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for patients with sepsis, and therefore play a critical role in early recognition and treatment. However, the extent to which sepsis guidelines are implemented across EDs in Europe remains unclear, and variability in adherence may impact patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess current sepsis management practices in European EDs, evaluate adherence to international guidelines, and identify key challenges limiting effective implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>A structured survey was developed by sepsis experts from the European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM). The questionnaire included both quantitative and open-ended items and underwent iterative refinement through pilot testing to ensure clarity and relevance.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>The survey was distributed to EUSEM members and national emergency medicine societies across Europe. Respondents included medical directors or designated sepsis specialists, with only one response requested per ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 402 EDs from 28 European countries participated in the survey. While most EDs (72.5%) reported having a sepsis protocol in place, less than half implemented regular monitoring or structured training measures. The 1-h sepsis bundle was described as moderately to highly challenging to implement by the majority of the respondents; just over half (55%) reported completing all its elements within 1 h of ED presentation. Key barriers included high patient volumes, insufficient staffing, and lack of standardized sepsis definitions, leading to delays in recognition and treatment. The results also highlighted concerns regarding increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use following the implementation of the 1-h bundle, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey establishes a benchmark for understanding sepsis management practices in European EDs, identifying substantial variations and challenges. Areas for improvement include enhanced training to follow protocols, improved monitoring systems that measure protocol adherence, and alignment with evidence-based guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"368-376"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current sepsis management practices in European emergency departments: the ISG-emergency department European Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Myrto Bolanaki, Lisa Kurland, Mikkel Brabrand, Ron Daniels, Kiren Govender, Frank Hanses, Francesca Innocenti, Annmarie Lassen, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Martin Möckel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for patients with sepsis, and therefore play a critical role in early recognition and treatment. However, the extent to which sepsis guidelines are implemented across EDs in Europe remains unclear, and variability in adherence may impact patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess current sepsis management practices in European EDs, evaluate adherence to international guidelines, and identify key challenges limiting effective implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>A structured survey was developed by sepsis experts from the European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM). The questionnaire included both quantitative and open-ended items and underwent iterative refinement through pilot testing to ensure clarity and relevance.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>The survey was distributed to EUSEM members and national emergency medicine societies across Europe. Respondents included medical directors or designated sepsis specialists, with only one response requested per ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 402 EDs from 28 European countries participated in the survey. While most EDs (72.5%) reported having a sepsis protocol in place, less than half implemented regular monitoring or structured training measures. The 1-h sepsis bundle was described as moderately to highly challenging to implement by the majority of the respondents; just over half (55%) reported completing all its elements within 1 h of ED presentation. Key barriers included high patient volumes, insufficient staffing, and lack of standardized sepsis definitions, leading to delays in recognition and treatment. The results also highlighted concerns regarding increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use following the implementation of the 1-h bundle, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers antimicrobial stewardship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey establishes a benchmark for understanding sepsis management practices in European EDs, identifying substantial variations and challenges. Areas for improvement include enhanced training to follow protocols, improved monitoring systems that measure protocol adherence, and alignment with evidence-based guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"368-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current sepsis management practices in European emergency departments: the ISG-emergency department European Survey.
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are often the first point of contact for patients with sepsis, and therefore play a critical role in early recognition and treatment. However, the extent to which sepsis guidelines are implemented across EDs in Europe remains unclear, and variability in adherence may impact patient outcomes.
Objective: This study aimed to assess current sepsis management practices in European EDs, evaluate adherence to international guidelines, and identify key challenges limiting effective implementation.
Methods and design: A structured survey was developed by sepsis experts from the European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM). The questionnaire included both quantitative and open-ended items and underwent iterative refinement through pilot testing to ensure clarity and relevance.
Settings and participants: The survey was distributed to EUSEM members and national emergency medicine societies across Europe. Respondents included medical directors or designated sepsis specialists, with only one response requested per ED.
Results: A total of 402 EDs from 28 European countries participated in the survey. While most EDs (72.5%) reported having a sepsis protocol in place, less than half implemented regular monitoring or structured training measures. The 1-h sepsis bundle was described as moderately to highly challenging to implement by the majority of the respondents; just over half (55%) reported completing all its elements within 1 h of ED presentation. Key barriers included high patient volumes, insufficient staffing, and lack of standardized sepsis definitions, leading to delays in recognition and treatment. The results also highlighted concerns regarding increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use following the implementation of the 1-h bundle, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that considers antimicrobial stewardship.
Conclusion: This survey establishes a benchmark for understanding sepsis management practices in European EDs, identifying substantial variations and challenges. Areas for improvement include enhanced training to follow protocols, improved monitoring systems that measure protocol adherence, and alignment with evidence-based guidelines.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field.
Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.