评估青年1型糖尿病患者血糖控制所需的最低连续血糖监测数据

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sonia Gera, Andrew Rearson, Robert J Gallop, Brynn E Marks
{"title":"评估青年1型糖尿病患者血糖控制所需的最低连续血糖监测数据","authors":"Sonia Gera, Andrew Rearson, Robert J Gallop, Brynn E Marks","doi":"10.1089/dia.2025.0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Consensus guidelines recommend reviewing 14 days of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data when assessing glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adult studies have shown that 7 days of CGM data provide a reliable assessment of glycemia. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To understand the minimum amount of CGM data required to assess glycemia in the pediatric T1D population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Real-world Dexcom G6 CGM data were extracted from cloud-based CGM software for 8 time windows (3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 30, 60, and 90 days), all starting on March 1, 2023. Youth <21 years with T1D and ≥70% CGM active time in each window were included. Pearson correlation and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 14-day data and other windows were calculated. Differences in the percentage of youth within predetermined thresholds of 14-day CGM metrics (±0.3% glucose management indicator [GMI]; ±5% time in range [TIR]/time in tight range; ±1% time below range <70 and <54 mg/dL) were assessed using chi-squared analyses. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorical groupings of 14-day TIR, coefficient of variation (CV), and age. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1316 youth were included (45.0% female, 76.9% non-Hispanic White, median age 14.6 years). Median 14-day CGM active time was 97.2% and GMI and TIR were 7.4% (7.0, 7.9) and 60.5% (48.6, 70.6), respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients and ICCs between 14-day and GMI and TIR for all 8 windows were >0.9; however, categorical agreement as defined by the percentage of subjects acceptable thresholds for GMI and TIR only exceeded 90% at 10 days. Although there was no difference in agreement for CGM metrics according to categorical groupings of age, agreement was stronger for youth with TIR ≥70% and CV <36%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although 14 days of CGM data are considered the gold standard, assessing ∼9.6 days of data in youth with T1D provides a reliable assessment of glycemia. For youth with higher TIR (≥70%) and lower CV (<36%), 7-day CGM data may prove sufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum Continuous Glucose Monitor Data Required to Assess Glycemic Control in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Gera, Andrew Rearson, Robert J Gallop, Brynn E Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2025.0173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Consensus guidelines recommend reviewing 14 days of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data when assessing glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adult studies have shown that 7 days of CGM data provide a reliable assessment of glycemia. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To understand the minimum amount of CGM data required to assess glycemia in the pediatric T1D population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Real-world Dexcom G6 CGM data were extracted from cloud-based CGM software for 8 time windows (3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 30, 60, and 90 days), all starting on March 1, 2023. Youth <21 years with T1D and ≥70% CGM active time in each window were included. Pearson correlation and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 14-day data and other windows were calculated. Differences in the percentage of youth within predetermined thresholds of 14-day CGM metrics (±0.3% glucose management indicator [GMI]; ±5% time in range [TIR]/time in tight range; ±1% time below range <70 and <54 mg/dL) were assessed using chi-squared analyses. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorical groupings of 14-day TIR, coefficient of variation (CV), and age. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1316 youth were included (45.0% female, 76.9% non-Hispanic White, median age 14.6 years). Median 14-day CGM active time was 97.2% and GMI and TIR were 7.4% (7.0, 7.9) and 60.5% (48.6, 70.6), respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients and ICCs between 14-day and GMI and TIR for all 8 windows were >0.9; however, categorical agreement as defined by the percentage of subjects acceptable thresholds for GMI and TIR only exceeded 90% at 10 days. Although there was no difference in agreement for CGM metrics according to categorical groupings of age, agreement was stronger for youth with TIR ≥70% and CV <36%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although 14 days of CGM data are considered the gold standard, assessing ∼9.6 days of data in youth with T1D provides a reliable assessment of glycemia. For youth with higher TIR (≥70%) and lower CV (<36%), 7-day CGM data may prove sufficient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0173\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:共识指南建议在评估1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的血糖时回顾14天的连续血糖监测(CGM)数据。成人研究表明,7天的CGM数据可提供可靠的血糖评估。目的:了解评估儿童T1D人群血糖所需的最低CGM数据量。方法:从2023年3月1日开始,从基于云的CGM软件中提取真实Dexcom G6 CGM数据,共8个时间窗口(3,5,7,10,14,30,60和90天)。青年结果:共纳入1316名青年(45.0%为女性,76.9%为非西班牙裔白人,中位年龄14.6岁)。14天CGM活动时间中位数为97.2%,GMI和TIR分别为7.4%(7.0,7.9)和60.5%(48.6,70.6)。所有8个窗口的14天间的Pearson相关系数和ICCs与GMI和TIR均为0.90;然而,根据受试者GMI和TIR可接受阈值百分比定义的绝对一致性仅在10天时超过90%。尽管根据年龄的分类分组,CGM指标的一致性没有差异,但对于TIR≥70%和CV的青年,一致性更强。结论:尽管14天的CGM数据被认为是金标准,但评估青少年T1D患者9.6天的数据提供了可靠的血糖评估。对于TIR较高(≥70%)和CV较低(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimum Continuous Glucose Monitor Data Required to Assess Glycemic Control in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.

Introduction: Consensus guidelines recommend reviewing 14 days of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data when assessing glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Adult studies have shown that 7 days of CGM data provide a reliable assessment of glycemia. Objectives: To understand the minimum amount of CGM data required to assess glycemia in the pediatric T1D population. Methods: Real-world Dexcom G6 CGM data were extracted from cloud-based CGM software for 8 time windows (3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 30, 60, and 90 days), all starting on March 1, 2023. Youth <21 years with T1D and ≥70% CGM active time in each window were included. Pearson correlation and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 14-day data and other windows were calculated. Differences in the percentage of youth within predetermined thresholds of 14-day CGM metrics (±0.3% glucose management indicator [GMI]; ±5% time in range [TIR]/time in tight range; ±1% time below range <70 and <54 mg/dL) were assessed using chi-squared analyses. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorical groupings of 14-day TIR, coefficient of variation (CV), and age. Results: A total of 1316 youth were included (45.0% female, 76.9% non-Hispanic White, median age 14.6 years). Median 14-day CGM active time was 97.2% and GMI and TIR were 7.4% (7.0, 7.9) and 60.5% (48.6, 70.6), respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients and ICCs between 14-day and GMI and TIR for all 8 windows were >0.9; however, categorical agreement as defined by the percentage of subjects acceptable thresholds for GMI and TIR only exceeded 90% at 10 days. Although there was no difference in agreement for CGM metrics according to categorical groupings of age, agreement was stronger for youth with TIR ≥70% and CV <36%. Conclusions: Although 14 days of CGM data are considered the gold standard, assessing ∼9.6 days of data in youth with T1D provides a reliable assessment of glycemia. For youth with higher TIR (≥70%) and lower CV (<36%), 7-day CGM data may prove sufficient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信