心肌梗死预后中的人工智能工具:评估机器学习和深度学习模型的性能。

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cyntia Szymańska, Artur Baszko
{"title":"心肌梗死预后中的人工智能工具:评估机器学习和深度学习模型的性能。","authors":"Cyntia Szymańska, Artur Baszko","doi":"10.2174/011573403X380162250706094642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical practice, mortality risk assessment in patients with myocardial infarction often relies on scales such as GRACE and TIMI. However, these scales were developed based on cohorts assembled many years ago. Since then, numerous changes have occurred, ranging from shifts in MI patient profiles to the introduction of new antiplatelet medications and the adoption of more restrictive lipid therapy targets. To address this issue, researchers are working to develop new stratification tools. Artificial intelligence (AI), which finds applications in nearly every area of medicine, also presents solutions to this problem. This review includes sixteen papers that contain machine learning and deep learning models used to prognosticate mortality risk at different points. Machine learning (ML) models, such as random forest, gradient boosting, and support vector machines, have demonstrated good to excellent performance. However, no single algorithm appears to be top-performing. Although artificial neural networks are considered one of the most promising algorithms, they do not invariably outperform other ML methods. The adaptability of AI models to various scenarios and their ability to handle complex datasets reassures us of their potential in cardiology. Concerning variables that influence the risk of mortality, most are well-established factors, such as age, left-ventricular ejection fraction, lipid parameters, and B-type natriuretic peptide. Additionally, less apparent indicators include platelet parameters, neutrophil count, and blood urea nitrogen. In conclusion, utilizing AI-based models in myocardial infarction risk stratification presents a significant opportunity to develop effective and tailored tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Tools in Myocardial Infarction Prognosis: Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.\",\"authors\":\"Cyntia Szymańska, Artur Baszko\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/011573403X380162250706094642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical practice, mortality risk assessment in patients with myocardial infarction often relies on scales such as GRACE and TIMI. However, these scales were developed based on cohorts assembled many years ago. Since then, numerous changes have occurred, ranging from shifts in MI patient profiles to the introduction of new antiplatelet medications and the adoption of more restrictive lipid therapy targets. To address this issue, researchers are working to develop new stratification tools. Artificial intelligence (AI), which finds applications in nearly every area of medicine, also presents solutions to this problem. This review includes sixteen papers that contain machine learning and deep learning models used to prognosticate mortality risk at different points. Machine learning (ML) models, such as random forest, gradient boosting, and support vector machines, have demonstrated good to excellent performance. However, no single algorithm appears to be top-performing. Although artificial neural networks are considered one of the most promising algorithms, they do not invariably outperform other ML methods. The adaptability of AI models to various scenarios and their ability to handle complex datasets reassures us of their potential in cardiology. Concerning variables that influence the risk of mortality, most are well-established factors, such as age, left-ventricular ejection fraction, lipid parameters, and B-type natriuretic peptide. Additionally, less apparent indicators include platelet parameters, neutrophil count, and blood urea nitrogen. In conclusion, utilizing AI-based models in myocardial infarction risk stratification presents a significant opportunity to develop effective and tailored tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Cardiology Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Cardiology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X380162250706094642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X380162250706094642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床实践中,心肌梗死患者的死亡风险评估往往依赖于GRACE、TIMI等量表。然而,这些量表是根据多年前收集的队列开发的。从那时起,发生了许多变化,从心肌梗死患者概况的转变到新的抗血小板药物的引入,以及采用更具限制性的脂质治疗靶点。为了解决这个问题,研究人员正在努力开发新的分层工具。几乎应用于医学各个领域的人工智能(AI)也为这一问题提供了解决方案。本综述包括16篇论文,其中包含用于预测不同时间点死亡风险的机器学习和深度学习模型。机器学习(ML)模型,如随机森林、梯度增强和支持向量机,已经证明了良好的性能。然而,没有哪一种算法是表现最好的。尽管人工神经网络被认为是最有前途的算法之一,但它们并不总是优于其他ML方法。人工智能模型对各种场景的适应性及其处理复杂数据集的能力使我们确信它们在心脏病学方面的潜力。关于影响死亡风险的变量,大多数是确定的因素,如年龄、左心室射血分数、脂质参数和b型利钠肽。此外,不太明显的指标包括血小板参数、中性粒细胞计数和血尿素氮。总之,在心肌梗死风险分层中使用基于人工智能的模型为开发有效和量身定制的工具提供了重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Tools in Myocardial Infarction Prognosis: Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.

In clinical practice, mortality risk assessment in patients with myocardial infarction often relies on scales such as GRACE and TIMI. However, these scales were developed based on cohorts assembled many years ago. Since then, numerous changes have occurred, ranging from shifts in MI patient profiles to the introduction of new antiplatelet medications and the adoption of more restrictive lipid therapy targets. To address this issue, researchers are working to develop new stratification tools. Artificial intelligence (AI), which finds applications in nearly every area of medicine, also presents solutions to this problem. This review includes sixteen papers that contain machine learning and deep learning models used to prognosticate mortality risk at different points. Machine learning (ML) models, such as random forest, gradient boosting, and support vector machines, have demonstrated good to excellent performance. However, no single algorithm appears to be top-performing. Although artificial neural networks are considered one of the most promising algorithms, they do not invariably outperform other ML methods. The adaptability of AI models to various scenarios and their ability to handle complex datasets reassures us of their potential in cardiology. Concerning variables that influence the risk of mortality, most are well-established factors, such as age, left-ventricular ejection fraction, lipid parameters, and B-type natriuretic peptide. Additionally, less apparent indicators include platelet parameters, neutrophil count, and blood urea nitrogen. In conclusion, utilizing AI-based models in myocardial infarction risk stratification presents a significant opportunity to develop effective and tailored tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reviews
Current Cardiology Reviews CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信