阵发性室上性心动过速腺苷给药的现状和认识:中国多省急诊科调查

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hao Zou, Guanguan Luo, Cheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Tu, Jiaohong Gan, Ruikai Zhu, Jie Qin, Jian Xia
{"title":"阵发性室上性心动过速腺苷给药的现状和认识:中国多省急诊科调查","authors":"Hao Zou, Guanguan Luo, Cheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Tu, Jiaohong Gan, Ruikai Zhu, Jie Qin, Jian Xia","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01288-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common arrhythmia in emergency departments, with adenosine recommended as the first-line therapy in international guidelines. However, its adoption remains limited in China due to accessibility challenges, cost concerns, and entrenched reliance on traditional antiarrhythmics.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current utilization of adenosine for PSVT in Chinese emergency departments, identify barriers to guideline adherence, and evaluate physicians' knowledge of adenosine administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 988 emergency physicians across 10 Chinese provinces from July 1 to July 31, 2024. The questionnaire, distributed via WeChat, collected demographic data, treatment preferences, and knowledge of adenosine's contraindications and side effects. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0.730, with chi-square tests for group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34.6% of physicians reported adenosine use, contrasting with higher utilization of amiodarone (63.77%) and propafenone (55.77%). Limited accessibility was evident: 53.74% of hospitals stocked adenosine, and only 55.18% of emergency departments maintained consistent supplies. While 58.57% of respondents correctly identified the 6 mg IV bolus dose, knowledge gaps persisted for contraindications and side effects. Attending physicians demonstrated lower protocol adherence than residents and chiefs (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency physicians, especially those in charge, have a limited understanding of SVT and the appropriate use of adenosine, necessitating further training for this demographic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current practices and knowledge of adenosine administration for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: a multi-province survey in Chinese emergency departments.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Zou, Guanguan Luo, Cheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Tu, Jiaohong Gan, Ruikai Zhu, Jie Qin, Jian Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01288-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common arrhythmia in emergency departments, with adenosine recommended as the first-line therapy in international guidelines. However, its adoption remains limited in China due to accessibility challenges, cost concerns, and entrenched reliance on traditional antiarrhythmics.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current utilization of adenosine for PSVT in Chinese emergency departments, identify barriers to guideline adherence, and evaluate physicians' knowledge of adenosine administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 988 emergency physicians across 10 Chinese provinces from July 1 to July 31, 2024. The questionnaire, distributed via WeChat, collected demographic data, treatment preferences, and knowledge of adenosine's contraindications and side effects. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0.730, with chi-square tests for group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34.6% of physicians reported adenosine use, contrasting with higher utilization of amiodarone (63.77%) and propafenone (55.77%). Limited accessibility was evident: 53.74% of hospitals stocked adenosine, and only 55.18% of emergency departments maintained consistent supplies. While 58.57% of respondents correctly identified the 6 mg IV bolus dose, knowledge gaps persisted for contraindications and side effects. Attending physicians demonstrated lower protocol adherence than residents and chiefs (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency physicians, especially those in charge, have a limited understanding of SVT and the appropriate use of adenosine, necessitating further training for this demographic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01288-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01288-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)是急诊科常见的心律失常,国际指南推荐将腺苷作为一线治疗。然而,由于可及性挑战、成本问题以及对传统抗心律失常药物的根深蒂固的依赖,其在中国的采用仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在评估中国急诊科在PSVT中腺苷的使用现状,确定指南依从性的障碍,并评估医生对腺苷给药的了解。方法:于2024年7月1日至7月31日对全国10个省988名急诊医师进行横断面调查。该问卷通过微信分发,收集了人口统计数据、治疗偏好以及对腺苷禁忌症和副作用的了解。采用GraphPad Prism 9.5.0.730进行统计学分析,组间比较采用卡方检验。结果:34.6%的医生报告使用腺苷,而胺碘酮(63.77%)和普罗帕酮(55.77%)的使用率较高。可及性有限:53.74%的医院有腺苷储备,只有55.18%的急诊科有稳定的供应。虽然58.57%的受访者正确识别了6mg静脉注射剂量,但对禁忌症和副作用的知识差距仍然存在。与住院医师和主任医师相比,主治医师表现出较低的协议依从性(P结论:急诊医师,尤其是那些负责人,对SVT和腺苷的适当使用了解有限,需要对这一人群进行进一步的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current practices and knowledge of adenosine administration for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: a multi-province survey in Chinese emergency departments.

Background: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common arrhythmia in emergency departments, with adenosine recommended as the first-line therapy in international guidelines. However, its adoption remains limited in China due to accessibility challenges, cost concerns, and entrenched reliance on traditional antiarrhythmics.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the current utilization of adenosine for PSVT in Chinese emergency departments, identify barriers to guideline adherence, and evaluate physicians' knowledge of adenosine administration.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 988 emergency physicians across 10 Chinese provinces from July 1 to July 31, 2024. The questionnaire, distributed via WeChat, collected demographic data, treatment preferences, and knowledge of adenosine's contraindications and side effects. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.5.0.730, with chi-square tests for group comparisons.

Results: 34.6% of physicians reported adenosine use, contrasting with higher utilization of amiodarone (63.77%) and propafenone (55.77%). Limited accessibility was evident: 53.74% of hospitals stocked adenosine, and only 55.18% of emergency departments maintained consistent supplies. While 58.57% of respondents correctly identified the 6 mg IV bolus dose, knowledge gaps persisted for contraindications and side effects. Attending physicians demonstrated lower protocol adherence than residents and chiefs (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Emergency physicians, especially those in charge, have a limited understanding of SVT and the appropriate use of adenosine, necessitating further training for this demographic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信