绘制学习型卫生系统进展图表:对5年来定义、模型和框架的系统回顾

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Louise A. Ellis, Georgia Fisher, Maree Saba, Genevieve Dammery, Kate Churruca, Samantha Spanos, Carolynn L. Smith, Bianca Forrester, Yvonne Zurynski, Jeffrey Braithwaite
{"title":"绘制学习型卫生系统进展图表:对5年来定义、模型和框架的系统回顾","authors":"Louise A. Ellis,&nbsp;Georgia Fisher,&nbsp;Maree Saba,&nbsp;Genevieve Dammery,&nbsp;Kate Churruca,&nbsp;Samantha Spanos,&nbsp;Carolynn L. Smith,&nbsp;Bianca Forrester,&nbsp;Yvonne Zurynski,&nbsp;Jeffrey Braithwaite","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Since being introduced by the Institute of Medicine (IoM) in 2007, the learning health system (LHS) concept has gained traction as a promising solution for achieving systems-level healthcare transformation. This review of the LHS literature consolidates current understanding of LHS definitions, models, frameworks, and underlying theory, relative to their initial conceptualization by the IoM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three academic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were searched for peer-reviewed literature between 2018 and 2023. Articles were included that explicitly focused on LHSs and described an LHS definition, model, or framework. Extracted article information included key article characteristics and article type; LHS definition(s) and their reference(s); components of LHS models or frameworks; and any reported theories underpinning LHS models or frameworks. Extracted data were examined using thematic and visual network analyses, and practical examples of how the domains of an LHS can be actualized in health settings were synthesized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The majority of the 226 included articles were nonempirical (47%) and originated from high-income countries (97%), with a significant portion from the United States (62%). A third of articles described an LHS implemented in a real-world setting (35%). A significant majority (82%) provided a definition of an LHS, with key concepts centering around “knowledge to practice,” “workplace culture,” and “informatics.” Over half of included articles described an LHS model or framework. From thematic deductive-inductive coding of 145 LHS models and frameworks, most identified aspects related to Science and Informatics (83%) and a Continuous Learning Culture (81%), with the most prevalent sub-domain being Supportive System Competencies (76%). Implementation science was the most used theory to underpin existing models and frameworks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>By dissecting LHS definitions, models, and frameworks, we present an integrated framework that can serve as a useful tool for LHS researchers, clinicians, and policymakers working to improve health system performance and outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charting progress in learning health systems: A systematic review of 5 years of definitions, models, and frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Louise A. Ellis,&nbsp;Georgia Fisher,&nbsp;Maree Saba,&nbsp;Genevieve Dammery,&nbsp;Kate Churruca,&nbsp;Samantha Spanos,&nbsp;Carolynn L. Smith,&nbsp;Bianca Forrester,&nbsp;Yvonne Zurynski,&nbsp;Jeffrey Braithwaite\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Since being introduced by the Institute of Medicine (IoM) in 2007, the learning health system (LHS) concept has gained traction as a promising solution for achieving systems-level healthcare transformation. This review of the LHS literature consolidates current understanding of LHS definitions, models, frameworks, and underlying theory, relative to their initial conceptualization by the IoM.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three academic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were searched for peer-reviewed literature between 2018 and 2023. Articles were included that explicitly focused on LHSs and described an LHS definition, model, or framework. Extracted article information included key article characteristics and article type; LHS definition(s) and their reference(s); components of LHS models or frameworks; and any reported theories underpinning LHS models or frameworks. Extracted data were examined using thematic and visual network analyses, and practical examples of how the domains of an LHS can be actualized in health settings were synthesized.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The majority of the 226 included articles were nonempirical (47%) and originated from high-income countries (97%), with a significant portion from the United States (62%). A third of articles described an LHS implemented in a real-world setting (35%). A significant majority (82%) provided a definition of an LHS, with key concepts centering around “knowledge to practice,” “workplace culture,” and “informatics.” Over half of included articles described an LHS model or framework. From thematic deductive-inductive coding of 145 LHS models and frameworks, most identified aspects related to Science and Informatics (83%) and a Continuous Learning Culture (81%), with the most prevalent sub-domain being Supportive System Competencies (76%). Implementation science was the most used theory to underpin existing models and frameworks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>By dissecting LHS definitions, models, and frameworks, we present an integrated framework that can serve as a useful tool for LHS researchers, clinicians, and policymakers working to improve health system performance and outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2007年由医学研究所(IoM)引入以来,学习型医疗系统(LHS)概念作为实现系统级医疗保健转型的有前途的解决方案获得了关注。这篇关于LHS文献的综述巩固了目前对LHS定义、模型、框架和基础理论的理解,相对于IoM最初的概念化。方法检索2018 - 2023年PubMed、Embase和Scopus三个学术数据库的同行评议文献。文章明确地关注于LHS,并描述了LHS的定义、模型或框架。提取的文章信息包括关键文章特征和文章类型;LHS定义及其参考资料;LHS模型或框架的组件;以及任何支持LHS模型或框架的理论报告。使用专题和可视化网络分析对提取的数据进行了检查,并综合了如何在卫生环境中实现LHS领域的实际示例。结果纳入的226篇文章中,大多数是非经验性的(47%),来自高收入国家(97%),其中很大一部分来自美国(62%)。三分之一的文章描述了在现实环境中实现的LHS(35%)。绝大多数(82%)提供了LHS的定义,其关键概念围绕“知识到实践”、“工作场所文化”和“信息学”。超过一半的文章描述了LHS模型或框架。从145个LHS模型和框架的主题演绎-归纳编码中,大多数确定的方面与科学和信息学(83%)和持续学习文化(81%)有关,最普遍的子领域是支持系统能力(76%)。实现科学是支持现有模型和框架的最常用的理论。通过剖析LHS的定义、模型和框架,我们提出了一个综合框架,可以作为LHS研究人员、临床医生和政策制定者改善卫生系统绩效和结果的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Charting progress in learning health systems: A systematic review of 5 years of definitions, models, and frameworks

Charting progress in learning health systems: A systematic review of 5 years of definitions, models, and frameworks

Introduction

Since being introduced by the Institute of Medicine (IoM) in 2007, the learning health system (LHS) concept has gained traction as a promising solution for achieving systems-level healthcare transformation. This review of the LHS literature consolidates current understanding of LHS definitions, models, frameworks, and underlying theory, relative to their initial conceptualization by the IoM.

Methods

Three academic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were searched for peer-reviewed literature between 2018 and 2023. Articles were included that explicitly focused on LHSs and described an LHS definition, model, or framework. Extracted article information included key article characteristics and article type; LHS definition(s) and their reference(s); components of LHS models or frameworks; and any reported theories underpinning LHS models or frameworks. Extracted data were examined using thematic and visual network analyses, and practical examples of how the domains of an LHS can be actualized in health settings were synthesized.

Results

The majority of the 226 included articles were nonempirical (47%) and originated from high-income countries (97%), with a significant portion from the United States (62%). A third of articles described an LHS implemented in a real-world setting (35%). A significant majority (82%) provided a definition of an LHS, with key concepts centering around “knowledge to practice,” “workplace culture,” and “informatics.” Over half of included articles described an LHS model or framework. From thematic deductive-inductive coding of 145 LHS models and frameworks, most identified aspects related to Science and Informatics (83%) and a Continuous Learning Culture (81%), with the most prevalent sub-domain being Supportive System Competencies (76%). Implementation science was the most used theory to underpin existing models and frameworks.

Conclusions

By dissecting LHS definitions, models, and frameworks, we present an integrated framework that can serve as a useful tool for LHS researchers, clinicians, and policymakers working to improve health system performance and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信