{"title":"双刃剑:思考医护人员对自残的反应","authors":"Tom Dalton","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-harm is common and familiar to many healthcare professionals working in mental health and emergency medicine. Encounters with patients who have self-harmed frequently elicit powerful emotional responses from professionals, which have been explored and characterised in a number of existing qualitative studies. Self-harm serves a number of different functions, ranging from conscious, intrapsychic motivations such as affect regulation, to interpersonal communicative functions which are understood within the psychoanalytic literature to be largely unconscious. This paper aims to explore the unconscious communicative functions of self-harm by characterising the common emotional responses of healthcare professionals encountering patients who have self-harmed, drawing on a narrative review of the existing literature as well as short interviews with clinical staff. Furthermore, this paper aims to understand these responses within the framework of the established unconscious interpersonal functions served by self-harm, thus bridging the divide that can often exist between the front-line exposure to the physicality of self-harm and psychodynamic understanding of the meanings underlying these experiences. The range of responses is organised firstly in terms of the primary emotional reactions, and secondly in terms of the healthcare professional's defences against these emotions, which may themselves be either intrapsychic or enacted. In conclusion, the essential importance of reflective practice in clinical work is emphasised.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"41 3","pages":"352-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-edged: Thinking about healthcare professionals' responses to self-harm\",\"authors\":\"Tom Dalton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjp.12971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Self-harm is common and familiar to many healthcare professionals working in mental health and emergency medicine. Encounters with patients who have self-harmed frequently elicit powerful emotional responses from professionals, which have been explored and characterised in a number of existing qualitative studies. Self-harm serves a number of different functions, ranging from conscious, intrapsychic motivations such as affect regulation, to interpersonal communicative functions which are understood within the psychoanalytic literature to be largely unconscious. This paper aims to explore the unconscious communicative functions of self-harm by characterising the common emotional responses of healthcare professionals encountering patients who have self-harmed, drawing on a narrative review of the existing literature as well as short interviews with clinical staff. Furthermore, this paper aims to understand these responses within the framework of the established unconscious interpersonal functions served by self-harm, thus bridging the divide that can often exist between the front-line exposure to the physicality of self-harm and psychodynamic understanding of the meanings underlying these experiences. The range of responses is organised firstly in terms of the primary emotional reactions, and secondly in terms of the healthcare professional's defences against these emotions, which may themselves be either intrapsychic or enacted. In conclusion, the essential importance of reflective practice in clinical work is emphasised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"352-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Double-edged: Thinking about healthcare professionals' responses to self-harm
Self-harm is common and familiar to many healthcare professionals working in mental health and emergency medicine. Encounters with patients who have self-harmed frequently elicit powerful emotional responses from professionals, which have been explored and characterised in a number of existing qualitative studies. Self-harm serves a number of different functions, ranging from conscious, intrapsychic motivations such as affect regulation, to interpersonal communicative functions which are understood within the psychoanalytic literature to be largely unconscious. This paper aims to explore the unconscious communicative functions of self-harm by characterising the common emotional responses of healthcare professionals encountering patients who have self-harmed, drawing on a narrative review of the existing literature as well as short interviews with clinical staff. Furthermore, this paper aims to understand these responses within the framework of the established unconscious interpersonal functions served by self-harm, thus bridging the divide that can often exist between the front-line exposure to the physicality of self-harm and psychodynamic understanding of the meanings underlying these experiences. The range of responses is organised firstly in terms of the primary emotional reactions, and secondly in terms of the healthcare professional's defences against these emotions, which may themselves be either intrapsychic or enacted. In conclusion, the essential importance of reflective practice in clinical work is emphasised.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.