从登记到学习健康系统:荷兰前列腺癌登记的案例研究

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tom Belleman, Jeroen D. H. van Wijngaarden, Malou C. P. Kuppen, Saskia de Groot, Kim J. M. van der Velden, Dianne Bosch, Inge M. van Oort, Carin A. Uyl-de Groot, Welmoed K. van Deen
{"title":"从登记到学习健康系统:荷兰前列腺癌登记的案例研究","authors":"Tom Belleman,&nbsp;Jeroen D. H. van Wijngaarden,&nbsp;Malou C. P. Kuppen,&nbsp;Saskia de Groot,&nbsp;Kim J. M. van der Velden,&nbsp;Dianne Bosch,&nbsp;Inge M. van Oort,&nbsp;Carin A. Uyl-de Groot,&nbsp;Welmoed K. van Deen","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Learning health systems (LHSs) are systems that seamlessly embed continuous quality improvement based on real-world data. To establish LHSs, several infrastructures need to be in place. Registries already have part(s) of this infrastructure and could therefore be leveraged to establish LHSs. This study aims to identify key factors facilitating the transition of registries into LHS to support continuous learning from real-world data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven interviews with 12 stakeholders, including medical specialists and nonmedical stakeholders, were conducted in the context of a prostate cancer registry. Findings were coded deductively based on seven previously identified facilitators for learning: complexity, relative advantage, compatibility, credibility, social impact, actionability, and resource match. These facilitators cover technical, social, and organizational aspects. An inductive phase followed to pinpoint factors for continuous learning and LHSs. Subsequently, two focus groups were conducted to ensure accurate interpretation of findings, and five expert panels to provide additional context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Complexity within healthcare systems emerged as a significant challenge, attributed to multiple stakeholders and the rapidly changing healthcare landscape. The advantage of LHSs is the timely availability of population-based data for real-time care adjustments. Compatibility of the system with stakeholders' needs was considered pivotal requiring a relatively flexible infrastructure. Credibility of data and results was supported by creating transparent processes in which stakeholders could review data from their own patient population. Social influences, including interpersonal trust and engaged leadership, fostered collaboration within LHSs. Actionability of the findings and resource match were vital for knowledge translation and sustainability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings provide practical recommendations to support registries in transitioning towards LHSs by leveraging and expanding their infrastructure for continuous learning. We identified technical, interpersonal, and organizational factors that facilitate continuous and rapid learning using real-world data, create transparent and collaborative infrastructures, and help to navigate the complexity of the healthcare system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10476","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving from a registry to a learning health system: A case study of a Dutch prostate cancer registry\",\"authors\":\"Tom Belleman,&nbsp;Jeroen D. H. van Wijngaarden,&nbsp;Malou C. P. Kuppen,&nbsp;Saskia de Groot,&nbsp;Kim J. M. van der Velden,&nbsp;Dianne Bosch,&nbsp;Inge M. van Oort,&nbsp;Carin A. Uyl-de Groot,&nbsp;Welmoed K. van Deen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.10476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Learning health systems (LHSs) are systems that seamlessly embed continuous quality improvement based on real-world data. To establish LHSs, several infrastructures need to be in place. Registries already have part(s) of this infrastructure and could therefore be leveraged to establish LHSs. This study aims to identify key factors facilitating the transition of registries into LHS to support continuous learning from real-world data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eleven interviews with 12 stakeholders, including medical specialists and nonmedical stakeholders, were conducted in the context of a prostate cancer registry. Findings were coded deductively based on seven previously identified facilitators for learning: complexity, relative advantage, compatibility, credibility, social impact, actionability, and resource match. These facilitators cover technical, social, and organizational aspects. An inductive phase followed to pinpoint factors for continuous learning and LHSs. Subsequently, two focus groups were conducted to ensure accurate interpretation of findings, and five expert panels to provide additional context.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Complexity within healthcare systems emerged as a significant challenge, attributed to multiple stakeholders and the rapidly changing healthcare landscape. The advantage of LHSs is the timely availability of population-based data for real-time care adjustments. Compatibility of the system with stakeholders' needs was considered pivotal requiring a relatively flexible infrastructure. Credibility of data and results was supported by creating transparent processes in which stakeholders could review data from their own patient population. Social influences, including interpersonal trust and engaged leadership, fostered collaboration within LHSs. Actionability of the findings and resource match were vital for knowledge translation and sustainability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings provide practical recommendations to support registries in transitioning towards LHSs by leveraging and expanding their infrastructure for continuous learning. We identified technical, interpersonal, and organizational factors that facilitate continuous and rapid learning using real-world data, create transparent and collaborative infrastructures, and help to navigate the complexity of the healthcare system.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10476\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习型卫生系统(lhs)是基于现实世界数据无缝嵌入持续质量改进的系统。要建立lhs,需要有几个基础设施。注册中心已经拥有这种基础设施的一部分,因此可以利用它们来建立lhs。本研究旨在确定促进注册表向LHS过渡的关键因素,以支持从现实数据中持续学习。方法在前列腺癌登记的背景下,对包括医学专家和非医学利益相关者在内的12名利益相关者进行了11次访谈。研究结果是基于先前确定的七个学习促进因素进行演绎编码的:复杂性、相对优势、兼容性、可信度、社会影响、可操作性和资源匹配。这些促进因素包括技术、社会和组织方面。接下来是归纳阶段,以确定持续学习和lhs的因素。随后,进行了两个焦点小组的讨论,以确保对调查结果作出准确的解释,并进行了五个专家小组的讨论,以提供更多的背景资料。结果:由于多个利益相关者和快速变化的医疗保健环境,医疗保健系统的复杂性成为一个重大挑战。lhs的优势在于能够及时获得基于人群的数据,以便进行实时护理调整。系统与利益相关者需求的兼容性被认为是关键,需要一个相对灵活的基础设施。数据和结果的可信度是通过建立透明的程序来支持的,在这个过程中,利益相关者可以审查来自他们自己患者群体的数据。社会影响,包括人际信任和敬业型领导,促进了lhs内部的合作。调查结果的可操作性和资源匹配对于知识转化和可持续性至关重要。我们的研究结果提供了实用的建议,以支持注册机构通过利用和扩展其持续学习的基础设施向lhs过渡。我们确定了技术、人际关系和组织因素,这些因素有助于使用真实数据进行持续快速的学习,创建透明和协作的基础设施,并有助于驾驭医疗保健系统的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving from a registry to a learning health system: A case study of a Dutch prostate cancer registry

Introduction

Learning health systems (LHSs) are systems that seamlessly embed continuous quality improvement based on real-world data. To establish LHSs, several infrastructures need to be in place. Registries already have part(s) of this infrastructure and could therefore be leveraged to establish LHSs. This study aims to identify key factors facilitating the transition of registries into LHS to support continuous learning from real-world data.

Methods

Eleven interviews with 12 stakeholders, including medical specialists and nonmedical stakeholders, were conducted in the context of a prostate cancer registry. Findings were coded deductively based on seven previously identified facilitators for learning: complexity, relative advantage, compatibility, credibility, social impact, actionability, and resource match. These facilitators cover technical, social, and organizational aspects. An inductive phase followed to pinpoint factors for continuous learning and LHSs. Subsequently, two focus groups were conducted to ensure accurate interpretation of findings, and five expert panels to provide additional context.

Results

Complexity within healthcare systems emerged as a significant challenge, attributed to multiple stakeholders and the rapidly changing healthcare landscape. The advantage of LHSs is the timely availability of population-based data for real-time care adjustments. Compatibility of the system with stakeholders' needs was considered pivotal requiring a relatively flexible infrastructure. Credibility of data and results was supported by creating transparent processes in which stakeholders could review data from their own patient population. Social influences, including interpersonal trust and engaged leadership, fostered collaboration within LHSs. Actionability of the findings and resource match were vital for knowledge translation and sustainability.

Conclusion

Our findings provide practical recommendations to support registries in transitioning towards LHSs by leveraging and expanding their infrastructure for continuous learning. We identified technical, interpersonal, and organizational factors that facilitate continuous and rapid learning using real-world data, create transparent and collaborative infrastructures, and help to navigate the complexity of the healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信