高级领导人如何支持大型学习型医疗系统的创新:来自美国退伍军人健康管理局国家项目办公室领导人的见解

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jaifred Christian F. Lopez, Sallie Allgood, Kate Sheahan, Brandolyn White, M. Amy Kirshner, Suzanne Shirley, Madison Coffey, Amanda Milo, Sarah L. Cutrona, Laura Damschroder, Gemmae M. Fix, Andrea L. Nevedal, Caitlin M. Reardon, Marilla A. Opra Widerquist, Maria Arasim, Allen L. Gifford, Kathryn DeLaughter, George L. Jackson
{"title":"高级领导人如何支持大型学习型医疗系统的创新:来自美国退伍军人健康管理局国家项目办公室领导人的见解","authors":"Jaifred Christian F. Lopez,&nbsp;Sallie Allgood,&nbsp;Kate Sheahan,&nbsp;Brandolyn White,&nbsp;M. Amy Kirshner,&nbsp;Suzanne Shirley,&nbsp;Madison Coffey,&nbsp;Amanda Milo,&nbsp;Sarah L. Cutrona,&nbsp;Laura Damschroder,&nbsp;Gemmae M. Fix,&nbsp;Andrea L. Nevedal,&nbsp;Caitlin M. Reardon,&nbsp;Marilla A. Opra Widerquist,&nbsp;Maria Arasim,&nbsp;Allen L. Gifford,&nbsp;Kathryn DeLaughter,&nbsp;George L. Jackson","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) formed an Innovation Ecosystem that develops and disseminates innovative practices to enhance Veterans' health. Support of senior leadership and their perception of the innovation process is key to the Ecosystem's success. We aimed to elicit insights on (1) how national VHA program office leaders define innovation, and (2) important considerations in facilitating the adoption of innovations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>As part of a quality improvement initiative, we conducted 19 semi-structured interviews via teleconference. Interviews involved 4 administration offices, 7 clinical and population health program offices, and 8 policy and quality improvement offices; 12 of these offices reported experience working with the Innovation Ecosystem. Responses were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants generally agreed that innovation within VHA is defined by evidence-based development and implementation of interventions that improve response to Veterans' needs. Considerations in facilitating innovations include: (1) implementation climate that promotes network-building, open communication, and well-executed planning processes; (2) implementation infrastructures that enable engagement with key players and augment existing resources; and (3) innovation evidence strength and responsiveness to patient needs. Individuals working in policy-related offices were more likely to identify complexity, leadership engagement, culture and available resources as factors in choosing innovations to adopt. Individuals who reported experience of working with the Ecosystem emphasized the importance of intra-organizational networks and a favorable implementation climate, while those without experience noted the importance of working with external change agents. CFIR ‘inner setting’ constructs were seen in responses across all categories; meanwhile, emerging constructs highlight how innovation should be balanced by the reality of operations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among national VHA program office leaders, innovation is pursued to improve Veterans' health. Resources, networks, culture, and processes are considered important factors among program office leaders to support and encourage innovation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How senior leaders support innovations in large learning health systems: Insights from United States Veterans Health Administration national program office leaders\",\"authors\":\"Jaifred Christian F. Lopez,&nbsp;Sallie Allgood,&nbsp;Kate Sheahan,&nbsp;Brandolyn White,&nbsp;M. Amy Kirshner,&nbsp;Suzanne Shirley,&nbsp;Madison Coffey,&nbsp;Amanda Milo,&nbsp;Sarah L. Cutrona,&nbsp;Laura Damschroder,&nbsp;Gemmae M. Fix,&nbsp;Andrea L. Nevedal,&nbsp;Caitlin M. Reardon,&nbsp;Marilla A. Opra Widerquist,&nbsp;Maria Arasim,&nbsp;Allen L. Gifford,&nbsp;Kathryn DeLaughter,&nbsp;George L. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) formed an Innovation Ecosystem that develops and disseminates innovative practices to enhance Veterans' health. Support of senior leadership and their perception of the innovation process is key to the Ecosystem's success. We aimed to elicit insights on (1) how national VHA program office leaders define innovation, and (2) important considerations in facilitating the adoption of innovations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>As part of a quality improvement initiative, we conducted 19 semi-structured interviews via teleconference. Interviews involved 4 administration offices, 7 clinical and population health program offices, and 8 policy and quality improvement offices; 12 of these offices reported experience working with the Innovation Ecosystem. Responses were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants generally agreed that innovation within VHA is defined by evidence-based development and implementation of interventions that improve response to Veterans' needs. Considerations in facilitating innovations include: (1) implementation climate that promotes network-building, open communication, and well-executed planning processes; (2) implementation infrastructures that enable engagement with key players and augment existing resources; and (3) innovation evidence strength and responsiveness to patient needs. Individuals working in policy-related offices were more likely to identify complexity, leadership engagement, culture and available resources as factors in choosing innovations to adopt. Individuals who reported experience of working with the Ecosystem emphasized the importance of intra-organizational networks and a favorable implementation climate, while those without experience noted the importance of working with external change agents. CFIR ‘inner setting’ constructs were seen in responses across all categories; meanwhile, emerging constructs highlight how innovation should be balanced by the reality of operations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among national VHA program office leaders, innovation is pursued to improve Veterans' health. Resources, networks, culture, and processes are considered important factors among program office leaders to support and encourage innovation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)建立了一个创新生态系统,开发和传播创新实践,以增强退伍军人的健康。高层领导的支持和他们对创新过程的看法是生态系统成功的关键。我们的目的是引出以下几点见解:(1)国家VHA项目办公室领导如何定义创新;(2)促进创新采用的重要考虑因素。方法作为质量改进计划的一部分,我们通过电话会议进行了19次半结构化访谈。访谈涉及4个行政办公室、7个临床和人口健康项目办公室、8个政策和质量改进办公室;其中12个办事处报告了与创新生态系统合作的经验。使用《实施研究统一框架》中的结构对回答进行录音、转录和分析。结果参与者普遍认为,VHA的创新是通过循证开发和实施干预措施来改善对退伍军人需求的反应。促进创新的考虑因素包括:(1)促进网络建设、开放沟通和良好执行规划流程的实施环境;(2)能够与关键参与者接触并增加现有资源的实施基础设施;(3)创新证据强度和对患者需求的响应。在与政策相关的办公室工作的个人更有可能将复杂性、领导参与度、文化和可用资源作为选择采用创新的因素。报告与生态系统合作经验的个人强调了组织内部网络和有利实施环境的重要性,而那些没有经验的人则指出了与外部变革推动者合作的重要性。在所有类别的反应中都可以看到CFIR“内部设置”结构;与此同时,新兴的结构强调了创新应该如何与运营的现实相平衡。结论国家VHA项目办公室领导在改善退伍军人健康方面追求创新。资源、网络、文化和过程被认为是项目办公室领导支持和鼓励创新的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How senior leaders support innovations in large learning health systems: Insights from United States Veterans Health Administration national program office leaders

Background

The U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) formed an Innovation Ecosystem that develops and disseminates innovative practices to enhance Veterans' health. Support of senior leadership and their perception of the innovation process is key to the Ecosystem's success. We aimed to elicit insights on (1) how national VHA program office leaders define innovation, and (2) important considerations in facilitating the adoption of innovations.

Methods

As part of a quality improvement initiative, we conducted 19 semi-structured interviews via teleconference. Interviews involved 4 administration offices, 7 clinical and population health program offices, and 8 policy and quality improvement offices; 12 of these offices reported experience working with the Innovation Ecosystem. Responses were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results

Participants generally agreed that innovation within VHA is defined by evidence-based development and implementation of interventions that improve response to Veterans' needs. Considerations in facilitating innovations include: (1) implementation climate that promotes network-building, open communication, and well-executed planning processes; (2) implementation infrastructures that enable engagement with key players and augment existing resources; and (3) innovation evidence strength and responsiveness to patient needs. Individuals working in policy-related offices were more likely to identify complexity, leadership engagement, culture and available resources as factors in choosing innovations to adopt. Individuals who reported experience of working with the Ecosystem emphasized the importance of intra-organizational networks and a favorable implementation climate, while those without experience noted the importance of working with external change agents. CFIR ‘inner setting’ constructs were seen in responses across all categories; meanwhile, emerging constructs highlight how innovation should be balanced by the reality of operations.

Conclusions

Among national VHA program office leaders, innovation is pursued to improve Veterans' health. Resources, networks, culture, and processes are considered important factors among program office leaders to support and encourage innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信