Ruiying Han, Dan Sun, Ying Zhang, Baosen Yue, Taotao Wang
{"title":"头孢他啶/阿维巴坦在革兰氏阴性细菌感染患者中的药代动力学/药效学和治疗药物监测","authors":"Ruiying Han, Dan Sun, Ying Zhang, Baosen Yue, Taotao Wang","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/6674305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to characterize ceftazidime/avibactam trough concentrations (<i>C</i><sub>min</sub>) in patients infected with resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Additionally, we assessed the risk factor associated with clinical cure, including joint optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study involving patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam therapy for Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime and avibactam. Analysis was performed on the <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime/avibactam was considered as optimal when both the PK/PD targets of ceftazidime (100%<i>f</i>T > 4 × MIC) and avibactam (100%<i>f</i>T > <i>C</i><sub><i>T</i></sub>) were simultaneously achieved; quasi-optimal if only one was achieved; and suboptimal if neither was achieved. Finally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to detect potential variables associated with clinical cure.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> This study analyzed a total of 39 infected patients, with results showing that the <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam was 24.1 ± 14.3 mg/L (coefficients of variation 59.5%), and 6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L (coefficients of variation 73.5%), respectively. Patients with renal insufficiency exhibited significantly higher <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam compared to those with normal renal function (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> were elevated in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) versus non-CRRT recipients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant difference in <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam was observed between elderly and nonelderly patients. Clinically cured patients accounted for 76.9% (30/39) of the total. For 23 infected patients with minimum inhibitory concentration results, optimal joint PK/PD target was observed in 16 patients (69.6%) and quasi-optimal in 7 patients (30.4%). Independent predictors of clinical cure were found to be optimal joint PK/PD target and co-administered with aztreonam.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The findings indicated that the <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam exhibit significant variability. With the current regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam, the majority of patients can achieve clinical cure and optimal PK/PD target.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/6674305","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Patients With Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections\",\"authors\":\"Ruiying Han, Dan Sun, Ying Zhang, Baosen Yue, Taotao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jcpt/6674305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to characterize ceftazidime/avibactam trough concentrations (<i>C</i><sub>min</sub>) in patients infected with resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Additionally, we assessed the risk factor associated with clinical cure, including joint optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study involving patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam therapy for Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime and avibactam. Analysis was performed on the <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime/avibactam was considered as optimal when both the PK/PD targets of ceftazidime (100%<i>f</i>T > 4 × MIC) and avibactam (100%<i>f</i>T > <i>C</i><sub><i>T</i></sub>) were simultaneously achieved; quasi-optimal if only one was achieved; and suboptimal if neither was achieved. Finally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to detect potential variables associated with clinical cure.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> This study analyzed a total of 39 infected patients, with results showing that the <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam was 24.1 ± 14.3 mg/L (coefficients of variation 59.5%), and 6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L (coefficients of variation 73.5%), respectively. Patients with renal insufficiency exhibited significantly higher <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam compared to those with normal renal function (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> were elevated in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) versus non-CRRT recipients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant difference in <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam was observed between elderly and nonelderly patients. Clinically cured patients accounted for 76.9% (30/39) of the total. For 23 infected patients with minimum inhibitory concentration results, optimal joint PK/PD target was observed in 16 patients (69.6%) and quasi-optimal in 7 patients (30.4%). Independent predictors of clinical cure were found to be optimal joint PK/PD target and co-administered with aztreonam.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The findings indicated that the <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> of ceftazidime and avibactam exhibit significant variability. With the current regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam, the majority of patients can achieve clinical cure and optimal PK/PD target.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/6674305\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/6674305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/6674305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Patients With Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Objectives: This study aimed to characterize ceftazidime/avibactam trough concentrations (Cmin) in patients infected with resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Additionally, we assessed the risk factor associated with clinical cure, including joint optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target.
Methods: We conducted a single-center observational retrospective study involving patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam therapy for Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime and avibactam. Analysis was performed on the Cmin of ceftazidime and avibactam. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime/avibactam was considered as optimal when both the PK/PD targets of ceftazidime (100%fT > 4 × MIC) and avibactam (100%fT > CT) were simultaneously achieved; quasi-optimal if only one was achieved; and suboptimal if neither was achieved. Finally, logistic regression analysis was utilized to detect potential variables associated with clinical cure.
Results: This study analyzed a total of 39 infected patients, with results showing that the Cmin of ceftazidime and avibactam was 24.1 ± 14.3 mg/L (coefficients of variation 59.5%), and 6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L (coefficients of variation 73.5%), respectively. Patients with renal insufficiency exhibited significantly higher Cmin of ceftazidime and avibactam compared to those with normal renal function (p < 0.05). Similarly, Cmin were elevated in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) versus non-CRRT recipients (p < 0.05). No significant difference in Cmin of ceftazidime and avibactam was observed between elderly and nonelderly patients. Clinically cured patients accounted for 76.9% (30/39) of the total. For 23 infected patients with minimum inhibitory concentration results, optimal joint PK/PD target was observed in 16 patients (69.6%) and quasi-optimal in 7 patients (30.4%). Independent predictors of clinical cure were found to be optimal joint PK/PD target and co-administered with aztreonam.
Conclusions: The findings indicated that the Cmin of ceftazidime and avibactam exhibit significant variability. With the current regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam, the majority of patients can achieve clinical cure and optimal PK/PD target.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including:
Rational therapeutics
Evidence-based practice
Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs
Drug interactions
Clinical impact of drug formulations
Pharmacogenetics
Personalised, stratified and translational medicine
Clinical pharmacokinetics.