探索实施干预措施,以促进分散的医疗保健系统的整合

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Cassandra Bragdon, Rachel Siden, Marcy Winget, Sonia Rose Harris, Rebecca Carey, Justin Ko, Alpa Vyas, Cati Brown-Johnson
{"title":"探索实施干预措施,以促进分散的医疗保健系统的整合","authors":"Cassandra Bragdon,&nbsp;Rachel Siden,&nbsp;Marcy Winget,&nbsp;Sonia Rose Harris,&nbsp;Rebecca Carey,&nbsp;Justin Ko,&nbsp;Alpa Vyas,&nbsp;Cati Brown-Johnson","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Stanford Medicine is working to better coordinate care across the Stanford healthcare system, as well as improve patient and provider experiences in seeking and receiving care. This study aimed to explore the complexities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated academic healthcare system and to identify and explain factors (e.g., facilitators and barriers) of the implementation of three interventions meant to improve patient experience, reduce staff burden, and integrate health care systems across faculty and community settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews via Zoom with faculty and community physicians. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and open coding. Using consensus coding approaches, researchers met regularly to discuss themes and adaptations to CFIR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed transcripts from interviews with physicians (<i>n</i> = 26). Factors impacting integration included the following: (1) physicians supported the interventions, promoting mission alignment; (2) physicians were motivated for change, reporting the existing system was intolerable; (3) physicians reported different priorities between clinics: faculty versus community and primary care versus specialty; (4) physicians prioritized interpersonal versus system solutions; (5) specialists were wary of unintended consequences of integration, specifically inappropriate bookings or patients being redirected to other clinics. Broadly speaking, facilitator factors 1–2 focused on the openness to, and tension for, change; and barrier factors 3–5 promoted or sustained variation across specialties and faculty/community clinics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results illustrate the challenges and opportunities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated healthcare system and emphasize the importance of building shared culture, collaboration, and coordinated actions across and within an integrated healthcare network.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10483","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring implementation of interventions to facilitate integration in fragmented healthcare systems\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra Bragdon,&nbsp;Rachel Siden,&nbsp;Marcy Winget,&nbsp;Sonia Rose Harris,&nbsp;Rebecca Carey,&nbsp;Justin Ko,&nbsp;Alpa Vyas,&nbsp;Cati Brown-Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.10483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stanford Medicine is working to better coordinate care across the Stanford healthcare system, as well as improve patient and provider experiences in seeking and receiving care. This study aimed to explore the complexities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated academic healthcare system and to identify and explain factors (e.g., facilitators and barriers) of the implementation of three interventions meant to improve patient experience, reduce staff burden, and integrate health care systems across faculty and community settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews via Zoom with faculty and community physicians. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and open coding. Using consensus coding approaches, researchers met regularly to discuss themes and adaptations to CFIR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analyzed transcripts from interviews with physicians (<i>n</i> = 26). Factors impacting integration included the following: (1) physicians supported the interventions, promoting mission alignment; (2) physicians were motivated for change, reporting the existing system was intolerable; (3) physicians reported different priorities between clinics: faculty versus community and primary care versus specialty; (4) physicians prioritized interpersonal versus system solutions; (5) specialists were wary of unintended consequences of integration, specifically inappropriate bookings or patients being redirected to other clinics. Broadly speaking, facilitator factors 1–2 focused on the openness to, and tension for, change; and barrier factors 3–5 promoted or sustained variation across specialties and faculty/community clinics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results illustrate the challenges and opportunities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated healthcare system and emphasize the importance of building shared culture, collaboration, and coordinated actions across and within an integrated healthcare network.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10483\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯坦福医学院正在努力更好地协调整个斯坦福医疗保健系统的护理,并改善患者和提供者在寻求和接受护理方面的体验。本研究旨在探讨从分散到整合的学术医疗保健系统的复杂性,并确定和解释实施三种干预措施的因素(例如,促进因素和障碍),这些干预措施旨在改善患者体验,减轻员工负担,并整合跨教师和社区设置的医疗保健系统。方法通过Zoom对教师和社区医生进行定性半结构化访谈。访谈录音,专业转录,并使用实施研究统一框架(CFIR)和开放编码进行分析。使用共识编码方法,研究人员定期开会讨论主题和对CFIR的适应。结果:我们分析了26位医生的访谈记录。影响整合的因素包括:(1)医生支持干预措施,促进任务一致性;(2)医生有改变的动力,认为现有的制度是无法忍受的;(3)医生报告了不同诊所的优先级:教师与社区,初级保健与专科;(4)医生优先考虑人际解决方案而不是系统解决方案;(5)专家们担心整合的意外后果,特别是不适当的预约或病人被转到其他诊所。从广义上讲,促进因素1-2侧重于对变化的开放和紧张;障碍因素3-5促进或维持了专业和教师/社区诊所之间的差异。我们的研究结果说明了从分散的医疗保健系统向综合医疗保健系统转变的挑战和机遇,并强调了在综合医疗保健网络之间和内部建立共享文化、协作和协调行动的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring implementation of interventions to facilitate integration in fragmented healthcare systems

Introduction

Stanford Medicine is working to better coordinate care across the Stanford healthcare system, as well as improve patient and provider experiences in seeking and receiving care. This study aimed to explore the complexities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated academic healthcare system and to identify and explain factors (e.g., facilitators and barriers) of the implementation of three interventions meant to improve patient experience, reduce staff burden, and integrate health care systems across faculty and community settings.

Methods

We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews via Zoom with faculty and community physicians. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and open coding. Using consensus coding approaches, researchers met regularly to discuss themes and adaptations to CFIR.

Results

We analyzed transcripts from interviews with physicians (n = 26). Factors impacting integration included the following: (1) physicians supported the interventions, promoting mission alignment; (2) physicians were motivated for change, reporting the existing system was intolerable; (3) physicians reported different priorities between clinics: faculty versus community and primary care versus specialty; (4) physicians prioritized interpersonal versus system solutions; (5) specialists were wary of unintended consequences of integration, specifically inappropriate bookings or patients being redirected to other clinics. Broadly speaking, facilitator factors 1–2 focused on the openness to, and tension for, change; and barrier factors 3–5 promoted or sustained variation across specialties and faculty/community clinics.

Conclusions

Our results illustrate the challenges and opportunities of moving from a fragmented to an integrated healthcare system and emphasize the importance of building shared culture, collaboration, and coordinated actions across and within an integrated healthcare network.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信