制定和实施以保健公平为重点的敏感性培训课程

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Allen M. Chen
{"title":"制定和实施以保健公平为重点的敏感性培训课程","authors":"Allen M. Chen","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>A longitudinal sensitivity-based curriculum focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and consisting of interactive seminars and roundtable discussions was constructed to equip participants with tools to enhance culturally effective care and to create an inclusive learning environment. The purpose of this study was to report our single-institutional experience with the development and implementation of this evidence-based curriculum.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Materials</h3>\n \n <p>Core DEI themes on which to center the sensitivity training curriculum were identified through an evidence-based review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A MEDLINE search was undertaken to identify original peer-reviewed works using the items “equity, diversity, inclusion,” “underserved,” “disadvantaged,” “sensitivity training,” and “curriculum.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on the search results, a 12-month curriculum was established centered on the core themes that emerged. The 98 peer-reviewed publications chosen to develop this thematic framework could be broadly categorized as follows: health disparities (<i>N</i> = 33); workplace diversity (<i>N</i> = 24); implicit bias (<i>N</i> = 21); and structural racism (<i>N</i> = 20). Between November 2022 and January 2024, a total of 12 interactive sessions were scheduled. The mean number of attendees for each DEI session was 19 (range: 3 to 32), and the mean length of each session was 50 min (range: 20 to 81).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The developed curriculum helped promote awareness of historical inequities in healthcare and empowered learners to become better advocates for colleagues and patients alike. The implication for healthcare leaders are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and implementation of a sensitivity training curriculum focused on equity in healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Allen M. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lrh2.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>A longitudinal sensitivity-based curriculum focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and consisting of interactive seminars and roundtable discussions was constructed to equip participants with tools to enhance culturally effective care and to create an inclusive learning environment. The purpose of this study was to report our single-institutional experience with the development and implementation of this evidence-based curriculum.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods and Materials</h3>\\n \\n <p>Core DEI themes on which to center the sensitivity training curriculum were identified through an evidence-based review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A MEDLINE search was undertaken to identify original peer-reviewed works using the items “equity, diversity, inclusion,” “underserved,” “disadvantaged,” “sensitivity training,” and “curriculum.”</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Based on the search results, a 12-month curriculum was established centered on the core themes that emerged. The 98 peer-reviewed publications chosen to develop this thematic framework could be broadly categorized as follows: health disparities (<i>N</i> = 33); workplace diversity (<i>N</i> = 24); implicit bias (<i>N</i> = 21); and structural racism (<i>N</i> = 20). Between November 2022 and January 2024, a total of 12 interactive sessions were scheduled. The mean number of attendees for each DEI session was 19 (range: 3 to 32), and the mean length of each session was 50 min (range: 20 to 81).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The developed curriculum helped promote awareness of historical inequities in healthcare and empowered learners to become better advocates for colleagues and patients alike. The implication for healthcare leaders are discussed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.70007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:构建以多样性、公平和包容(DEI)为重点的纵向敏感性课程,包括互动式研讨会和圆桌讨论,为参与者提供工具,以加强文化上有效的护理,并创造一个包容的学习环境。本研究的目的是报告我们单一机构在开发和实施循证课程方面的经验。方法和材料通过基于系统评价和荟萃分析方案优选报告项目(PRISMA-P)声明的循证评价确定敏感性培训课程的核心DEI主题。通过MEDLINE搜索,使用“公平、多样性、包容性”、“服务不足”、“弱势”、“敏感性培训”和“课程”等条目来识别原始的同行评议作品。根据搜索结果,围绕所出现的核心主题建立了为期12个月的课程。选定的98份同行评议出版物可大致分为以下几类:健康差异(N = 33);工作场所多样性(N = 24);内隐偏倚(N = 21);结构性种族主义(N = 20)。在2022年11月至2024年1月期间,共安排了12场互动会议。每次DEI会话的平均参加人数为19人(范围:3至32人),每次会话的平均时长为50分钟(范围:20至81人)。开发的课程有助于提高对医疗保健历史不平等的认识,并使学习者能够更好地为同事和患者辩护。讨论了对医疗保健领导者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Development and implementation of a sensitivity training curriculum focused on equity in healthcare

Development and implementation of a sensitivity training curriculum focused on equity in healthcare

Purpose

A longitudinal sensitivity-based curriculum focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and consisting of interactive seminars and roundtable discussions was constructed to equip participants with tools to enhance culturally effective care and to create an inclusive learning environment. The purpose of this study was to report our single-institutional experience with the development and implementation of this evidence-based curriculum.

Methods and Materials

Core DEI themes on which to center the sensitivity training curriculum were identified through an evidence-based review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A MEDLINE search was undertaken to identify original peer-reviewed works using the items “equity, diversity, inclusion,” “underserved,” “disadvantaged,” “sensitivity training,” and “curriculum.”

Results

Based on the search results, a 12-month curriculum was established centered on the core themes that emerged. The 98 peer-reviewed publications chosen to develop this thematic framework could be broadly categorized as follows: health disparities (N = 33); workplace diversity (N = 24); implicit bias (N = 21); and structural racism (N = 20). Between November 2022 and January 2024, a total of 12 interactive sessions were scheduled. The mean number of attendees for each DEI session was 19 (range: 3 to 32), and the mean length of each session was 50 min (range: 20 to 81).

Conclusion

The developed curriculum helped promote awareness of historical inequities in healthcare and empowered learners to become better advocates for colleagues and patients alike. The implication for healthcare leaders are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信