{"title":"护士对交接实践有效性的感知、影响因素和感知障碍:一项对内科和外科护士的描述性横断面研究","authors":"İpek Köse Tosunöz , Ayşe Aydınlı","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ineffective handover may lead to patient harm.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to determine nurses’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the handover process and the factors that influence handover effectiveness and perceived barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-centre descriptive cross-sectional design was used. The study was completed with 249 nurses working in the medical and surgical units of a city hospital in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Data were collected with the ‘Personal Information Form’ and ‘Handover Evaluation Scale (HES)’ between July and October 2023. The generalised linear model (GLM) analysis with gamma distribution and log link function was used. The STROBE guidelines were followed in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The HES total mean score was 56.0 ± 6.9. According to the multivariable GLM analysis, female nurses (Exp(B)=1.062), those who received handover training (Exp(B)=1.055), and those who used handover tools such as forms, inpatient lists, or records (Exp(B)=1.077) had significantly higher HES scores (<em>p</em><.05 for all). Noise, workload, and tiredness were the most frequently reported barriers to effective handover.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Nurses’ perceptions of handover effectiveness were high, with a total mean score on the HES of 80% (56.0/70). Sex, receiving handover training, and using forms, records, or lists were associated with nurses’ perceptions of handover effectiveness. Noise was the most frequent negative influencing factor. The findings may be useful for further studies on the handover effectiveness and strategies to maintain and improve effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The high perceptions of handover effectiveness are important for patient safety and care continuity. This study showed the importance of training and standardisation in handover effectiveness and the need to control factors that negatively affect the handover process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"32 4","pages":"Pages 242-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' perceptions of the effectiveness of handover practices, influencing factors and perceived barriers: A descriptive cross-sectional study of medical and surgical nurses\",\"authors\":\"İpek Köse Tosunöz , Ayşe Aydınlı\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2025.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ineffective handover may lead to patient harm.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to determine nurses’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the handover process and the factors that influence handover effectiveness and perceived barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-centre descriptive cross-sectional design was used. The study was completed with 249 nurses working in the medical and surgical units of a city hospital in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Data were collected with the ‘Personal Information Form’ and ‘Handover Evaluation Scale (HES)’ between July and October 2023. The generalised linear model (GLM) analysis with gamma distribution and log link function was used. The STROBE guidelines were followed in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The HES total mean score was 56.0 ± 6.9. According to the multivariable GLM analysis, female nurses (Exp(B)=1.062), those who received handover training (Exp(B)=1.055), and those who used handover tools such as forms, inpatient lists, or records (Exp(B)=1.077) had significantly higher HES scores (<em>p</em><.05 for all). Noise, workload, and tiredness were the most frequently reported barriers to effective handover.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Nurses’ perceptions of handover effectiveness were high, with a total mean score on the HES of 80% (56.0/70). Sex, receiving handover training, and using forms, records, or lists were associated with nurses’ perceptions of handover effectiveness. Noise was the most frequent negative influencing factor. The findings may be useful for further studies on the handover effectiveness and strategies to maintain and improve effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The high perceptions of handover effectiveness are important for patient safety and care continuity. This study showed the importance of training and standardisation in handover effectiveness and the need to control factors that negatively affect the handover process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769625000423\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769625000423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nurses' perceptions of the effectiveness of handover practices, influencing factors and perceived barriers: A descriptive cross-sectional study of medical and surgical nurses
Background
Ineffective handover may lead to patient harm.
Aim
The purpose of this study is to determine nurses’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the handover process and the factors that influence handover effectiveness and perceived barriers.
Methods
A single-centre descriptive cross-sectional design was used. The study was completed with 249 nurses working in the medical and surgical units of a city hospital in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Data were collected with the ‘Personal Information Form’ and ‘Handover Evaluation Scale (HES)’ between July and October 2023. The generalised linear model (GLM) analysis with gamma distribution and log link function was used. The STROBE guidelines were followed in the study.
Findings
The HES total mean score was 56.0 ± 6.9. According to the multivariable GLM analysis, female nurses (Exp(B)=1.062), those who received handover training (Exp(B)=1.055), and those who used handover tools such as forms, inpatient lists, or records (Exp(B)=1.077) had significantly higher HES scores (p<.05 for all). Noise, workload, and tiredness were the most frequently reported barriers to effective handover.
Discussion
Nurses’ perceptions of handover effectiveness were high, with a total mean score on the HES of 80% (56.0/70). Sex, receiving handover training, and using forms, records, or lists were associated with nurses’ perceptions of handover effectiveness. Noise was the most frequent negative influencing factor. The findings may be useful for further studies on the handover effectiveness and strategies to maintain and improve effectiveness.
Conclusion
The high perceptions of handover effectiveness are important for patient safety and care continuity. This study showed the importance of training and standardisation in handover effectiveness and the need to control factors that negatively affect the handover process.
期刊介绍:
Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN).
The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues.
Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor.
The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription.
ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.